Two issues of the day related to the government’s “dangerous and dangerous foreign policy”, says SYRIZA-PS in a statement.
The first concerns the statements of the Secretary General of NATO, M. He asks about a “dedicated ally” where he accuses the prime minister of “remaining a devotee of the doctrine of the “given ally” without considering the consequences of this policy for the country”.
On the second issue, he emphasizes that “it would be good for Mr. Mitsotakis, instead of making general statements about respect for international law, not to oppose it, when it does not serve his petty political interests, as indicated by the government’s express disagreement with the recent decision of of the International Court of Justice in The Hague for the issuance of an international warrant for the Prime Minister of Israel, B. Netanyahu”.
Read about it: Maximos “argues” the International Criminal Court about the warrant against Netanyahu – “It will not solve any problems”
The announcement of SYRIZA
“The dangerous and IX foreign policy of the government based on the doctrine of the “given ally”, which SYRIZA-PS systematically denounces as a blow to the national interests of our country, is also confirmed by today’s statements of the Secretary General of NATO M. You are asking about a “devoted ally”.
It proves again, therefore, that Mr. Mitsotakis remains a devotee of the doctrine of the “given ally” without considering the implications of this policy for the country.
From here on, it would be good for Mr. Mitsotakis, instead of making general statements about respect for international law, not to oppose it, when it does not serve his petty political interests, as indicated by the government’s express disagreement with the recent decision of the International Court of The Hague for the issuance of an international warrant for the Prime Minister of Israel, B. Netanyahu.
In any case, it is unacceptable for the NATO Secretary General to stress that “we will defend every inch of NATO territory” and for the Greek President not to underline Turkey’s obligation to respect Greece’s territory as dictated by Article 1 of the Washington Treaty. .
Read also:
Conclusion – Von der Leyen holiday scandal at Mitsotakis house in Chania – “Conflict of interest”
ND: New resounding resignation of a high-ranking executive in the wake of Samara’s deletion – “The course of deterioration is irreversible”
Tsapanidou: “The government’s attack on ADAE continues”
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘726515947549353’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
#SYRIZA #governments #foreign #policy #dangerous #dangerous #NATO #International #Law
**How does Greece’s adherence to the “devoted ally” doctrine, as criticized by SYRIZA-PS, potentially impact its ability to independently advance its own interests in areas like energy security and regional stability?**
## “Dangerous Diplomacy?” A Discussion on Greece’s Foreign Policy
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today we’re discussing recent developments in Greece’s foreign policy, specifically focusing on criticism levied by SYRIZA-PS against the current government’s approach. Joining us are two esteemed guests: Dr. [Guest 1 Name], a political analyst specializing in Greek foreign relations, and [Guest 2 Name], a legal expert with extensive knowledge of international law. Welcome to both of you.
**Section 1: The “Devoted Ally” Doctrine**
* **Host:** SYRIZA-PS criticizes Greece’s adherence to what they call the “doctrine of the ”given ally”. Dr. [Guest 1 Name], could you elaborate on what this doctrine entails and why SYRIZA-PS finds it problematic?
* **Follow-up:** Do you agree with SYRIZA’s assessment, Dr. [Guest 1 Name]? What are the potential risks and benefits of this approach for Greece’s foreign policy?
* **Host:** [Guest 2 Name], from a legal perspective, does aligning oneself with a “given ally,” as characterized by SYRIZA, potentially compromise a nation’s ability to uphold international law independently?
**Section 2: The International Criminal Court Warrant and Netanyahu**
* **Host:** SYRIZA also highlights Greece’s disagreement with the recent International Court of Justice decision to issue an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. [Guest 2 Name], can you shed light on the legal ramifications of such a decision and why it might be a point of contention for Greece?
* **Follow-up:**
Dr. [Guest 1 Name], how do you view Greece’s stance on this issue? Does it align with Greece’s broader foreign policy objectives, or does it raise concerns about consistency in upholding international legal principles?
**Section 3: NATO, Greece, and Turkey**
* **Host:** The article mentions the NATO Secretary General’s statements about defending every inch of NATO territory and points to Greece’s silence on Turkey’s potential violation of this principle. Dr. [Guest 1 Name], what are the complexities involved in balancing Greece’s obligations within NATO with its concerns regarding Turkey’s actions?
* **Follow-up:** [Guest 2 Name], how can international legal frameworks effectively address issues arising from tensions between NATO members, such as those between Greece and Turkey?
**Conclusion:**
* **Host:** Thank you, both, for these insightful perspectives. Clearly, Greece’s foreign policy faces a complex landscape of strategic alliances, international legal obligations, and regional tensions. This discussion has highlighted the delicate balancing act involved in navigating these challenges. We leave it to our viewers to consider the various viewpoints presented and form their own conclusions about the future trajectory of Greek foreign policy.
