Home » News » Supreme Court Lawyer Faces Tax Evasion Charges Over Poker Winnings

Supreme Court Lawyer Faces Tax Evasion Charges Over Poker Winnings

Top Supreme Court Lawyer ‌Indicted on​ Federal Tax Evasion Charges

tom Goldstein, a prominent attorney and co-founder of the ⁢widely-read poker winnings and used funds from his law ⁢firm to ‌cover gambling debts.⁢

Goldstein, 54, is also accused of⁢ making false statements to two mortgage ⁤ lenders. According to the indictment,⁣ he willfully⁣ failed to pay over $5.3 million in taxes⁣ owed‍ to ‍the IRS between⁤ 2016 and 2021.

A seasoned litigator, Goldstein has appeared before the Bush v. Gore case, which halted the recount of Florida ⁢ballots in the disputed 2000 presidential ‌election. He also successfully defended Google ⁤ in a high-profile case involving allegations that its use of Oracle software ‌code in Android violated U.S. copyright law.

Goldstein’s legal expertise extends beyond the courtroom.He has taught at Harvard Law School and is a respected commentator on Supreme Court​ matters. Though, his recent indictment casts a shadow over his illustrious career.‍

The charges highlight the serious consequences of tax evasion, particularly for high-profile individuals.Goldstein’s case ​underscores the importance of transparency and accountability⁣ in⁢ financial ⁤dealings, even for those with‌ significant professional achievements.

Key details‌ of the Case

| Aspect ‍ ‍ | Details ​ ‍ ⁢ ⁢ ⁢⁣ ⁤ ​ |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Charges ⁢ ⁣| Federal​ tax⁣ evasion, false statements to mortgage lenders ‌ ⁤ ⁤ |
| ​ Alleged Tax Debt | $5.3 million (2016–2021)⁤ ⁤ ​ ⁣ ⁢ ​ ​ ⁣ ⁢ |
| Key ‍Allegations | Undeclared poker winnings, misuse of ‌law firm funds ​for gambling debts ​ ⁣​ |
| Notable Career Milestones ‌| Represented Al Gore in Bush v. Gore, defended Google in ⁣copyright ⁢case |

Goldstein’s case is a stark reminder of the legal and ethical responsibilities that come with professional success.As the ⁣legal proceedings unfold, the public will be watching closely to⁤ see how this high-profile case impacts ‍his legacy ​and the broader conversation about tax compliance.

For more insights into the implications of tax evasion and its impact on high-profile individuals, explore the latest developments in tax evasion and avoidance.

Prominent Attorney Thomas‌ Goldstein Faces 22-Count Indictment ‌Over Gambling Debts ‌and⁢ Tax Evasion

Thomas goldstein, a⁣ well-known appellate attorney and co-founder of ⁢SCOTUSblog, is facing a 22-count federal indictment ⁣in Maryland ⁣over⁣ allegations‌ of misusing ⁢law firm ⁣funds, tax evasion,‌ and falsifying mortgage applications. The charges stem from a series of high-stakes poker games, ⁤unpaid taxes, and personal debts that Goldstein allegedly concealed ​from authorities.

According to the indictment, Goldstein‍ diverted over $1.1 million from his Bethesda-based law firm,Goldstein & Russell,to pay personal debts,including gambling obligations​ to poker players. The firm, which specialized in appellate litigation, ⁤has as​ been renamed following Goldstein’s retirement in early 2023.

High-Stakes Poker and Financial Misconduct

Goldstein, described as an “ultrahigh-stakes power player,” reportedly​ won millions in poker matches across the U.S. and abroad. In 2016, he ⁤allegedly won⁢ $13.8⁢ million in a series of matches against a foreign gambler in Asia⁢ and later secured $26.4 million in games against a California businessman⁢ in beverly⁤ hills. ⁢Despite these winnings, Goldstein is accused of underreporting⁢ his gambling income by more than $3.9 million on his 2016 federal tax return and omitting $3.4 million⁤ in gambling income on‍ his ‌2017 return.

The indictment also alleges that Goldstein‌ submitted false mortgage applications in 2021 to purchase a $2.6‌ million home ‌in Washington, D.C. He reportedly omitted over $14 million‌ in​ liabilities, including promissory notes and⁤ unpaid taxes to the IRS, ultimately securing ‌a $1.98 million ⁤loan.

personal ⁤relationships and Firm Misuse

From 2016 to 2022, Goldstein ⁤allegedly pursued intimate relationships⁢ with at least a dozen women, paying for their travel and other expenses while owing substantial ​amounts to the IRS. Four of these ⁤women were nominally hired by his firm, receiving health benefits despite performing “little or no work.”

legal defense and Public Reaction

Goldstein’s attorneys, John Lauro and Christopher Kise, have vehemently denied the charges,‌ stating, “Mr. Goldstein is a prominent attorney with an ‍impeccable reputation. We are deeply disappointed that the government brought these charges in a rush to ⁣judgment without understanding all of the ​important facts.” They added,”Our client intends to vigorously contest these charges and we expect he will be exonerated at trial.”

Goldstein, who co-founded SCOTUSblog with his wife, Amy Howe, in 2002, has been a notable figure in the legal community. His poker exploits were highlighted ⁣in ⁤a 2008 Washington Post article, were‍ he described being “caught up watching ⁢poker on ESPN.” The article noted his participation in the World Series of Poker and an⁢ 18-hour cash game at the Bellagio, where he ⁢turned a $12,000 stack into‌ over $100,000.

Charges and Potential Penalties

Goldstein⁢ faces multiple charges, including⁣ tax evasion, aiding and assisting ⁣in the preparation of false tax returns, willful failure to pay taxes, ‍and making false statements on loan applications. If convicted, he could ⁢face significant fines ‌and ​imprisonment.

| Key Allegations Against​ Thomas Goldstein | ​
|———————————————-|
| Diverted $1.1 million in firm ⁣funds to pay personal debts |
| Underreported $3.9 million in gambling ⁣income (2016) |
| omitted‍ $3.4 million in​ gambling income‍ (2017) |
| Submitted false mortgage applications for a $2.6‌ million home | ⁢
| Omitted $14 million in liabilities on mortgage applications |
|‍ Paid personal ‍expenses⁣ for women while owing IRS debts |

What’s Next?

As the case​ moves to trial, Goldstein’s legal team ‌is preparing a robust defense, arguing that the⁣ charges⁣ are based on incomplete details.‍ The⁣ outcome of this high-profile case could have significant implications for both goldstein’s ⁢legacy and the legal community at large.

For more on this story and other political coverage, visit CNBC Politics.

— ⁤
This article is based exclusively on the information ‌provided in the source material. For further‍ details, refer to⁢ the original Washington Post article and CNBC coverage.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.