“Superbonus Scandal: Revenue Agency Starts Checks and Many Italians Could Be at Risk – Grantennistoscana.it”

The checks by the Revenue Agency regarding the Superbonus are underway. And many are already starting to tremble.

The Superbonus is once again being talked about. The checks by the Revenue Agency have begun and for many Italians the consequences could be very serious.

Il Superbonus takes center stage again. On the contrary: perhaps she has never ceased to be one given the fuss that arose in the aftermath of the Meloni government’s decision to abolish it. This measure, born in the Cinque Stelle house, has allowed entire condominiums to be renovated with a subsidy equal to 110% of the amount spent. A single subsidy. Small detail: in two years it cost the State about 120 billion euros. A mortgage on the future of young people who will have to deal with an ever higher public debt.

But that’s not all: very often subsidies are born with the best intentions to help those who really need it but then they become fertile ground on which to build scams more ingenious. This was the case for the Citizenship Income and also the Superbonus was an unmissable opportunity for many scammers, expert connoisseurs of the real estate and construction sector.

Superbonus: this is who is at risk

Fortunately or unfortunately, the checks by the Revenue Agency have started. The aim is to verify that there have been no frauds against the State. The profiles at risk are different and under different aspects. Let’s analyze in detail what could happen to those who have benefited from the Superbonus 110% without being entitled to it.

Specifically, the Revenue Agency check 3 things:

• the consistency and regularity of the data indicated in the communications with those present in the Tax Registry;
• data on the credits being transferred and on the subjects involved in the operations;
• similar transfers made previously by the subjects indicated in the communications and in the options.

In particular, the Revenue Agency wants to investigate those situations in which condominiums have been created “ad hoc” between evening and morning just to be able to get the Superbonus. It seems incredible but, instead, these are cases that really happened. It is an abuse of law. This category includes splits or properties sold to relatives of the sole director of a company. This illegal phenomenon was recently discovered a Trieste. In the capital of Friuli Venezia Giulia, a company had purchased a property consisting of nine apartments. The properties were then sold to the mother, wife and mother-in-law of the sole director of the company. But the actual buyer was the company.

The Court of Justice of Trieste ruled that the purchasing and contractor company of the works, with the various transfers and sales, had the sole purpose of simulate the constitution of a condominium in order to be able to access not only the Superbonus 110% but, using the credit transfer method, carry out the complete renovation of a property, purchased in a dilapidated and unusable state, at the total expense of the State. The condominium in question is still unusable and uninhabited: who has benefited from the Superbonus al 110%evidently did not make the use for which the subsidy had been granted. In cases like these, you risk a lot. Of course all building credits are suspended but you can also be charged with fraud against the state.