“`html
News Staff">
Sudanese Army Recaptures key city of El Obeid After Year Under RSF Control
Published:
In a meaningful growth in Sudan‘s ongoing civil war,the Sudanese army announced on February 23,2025,that it had successfully recaptured El Obeid. This strategically crucial city, located south of Khartoum, had been under the control of the Rapid Support forces (RSF) for over a year. The recapture marks a potential turning point in the conflict, shifting the balance of power and raising questions about the future trajectory of the war.
el Obeid serves as the capital of North Kordofan province. Its strategic importance stems from its location as a vital junction connecting Khartoum with South Darfur, a region largely under RSF control. This connection makes El obeid a critical supply route and a key point for controlling movement between these regions. Moreover, the city houses a crucial air force base and an infantry division, making it a significant military asset for the sudanese army. The loss of El Obeid represents a considerable setback for the RSF, impacting their logistical capabilities and overall control in the region.
The recapture of El Obeid follows other recent gains by the Sudanese army in different parts of the country.The RSF has also been driven from the city of Wad Madani, situated southeast of Khartoum, as well as other areas within the Gezira province.The army initiated an offensive in Gezira province in recent months, contributing to these territorial gains. These advances suggest a shift in momentum, possibly weakening the RSF’s overall position.
Adding to the RSF’s setbacks, the paramilitary movement has also lost its last stronghold in the province of Witte Nile, located south of Khartoum. Recent reports indicate a tragic event in the provincial capital, Al Gitaina, where 200 people were reportedly killed by RSF forces over a three-day period last week. This incident underscores the brutal nature of the conflict and the devastating impact on civilian populations.
The Sudanese army has also claimed to have seized a significant RSF headquarters. Moreover, they assert that the recapture of the presidential palace in Khartoum is imminent, even though the capital remains largely under RSF control. If the army were to regain control of the presidential palace, it would represent a major symbolic victory and further consolidate their position.
A Conflict Marked by Atrocities
The conflict in Sudan,now approaching its second year,is a power struggle between the Sudanese army and the RSF. The war erupted following a coup by leaders from both groups, who subsequently disagreed over the allocation of power. This disagreement escalated into open conflict, plunging the country into a state of chaos and instability.
The United States has taken a strong stance against the RSF, accusing them of genocide and imposing sanctions on their leader, Hamdan. Sanctions have also been levied against the leader of the Sudanese army in response to atrocities committed against civilians by army forces. These sanctions reflect international condemnation of the violence and attempts to hold those responsible accountable.
Despite ongoing mediation efforts, a resolution to the conflict remains elusive. The sanctions imposed on both leaders have so far failed to halt the ongoing violence. The complexities of the conflict, coupled with deep-seated mistrust between the warring parties, have made it challenging to achieve a lasting peace agreement.
The devastating conflict has resulted in the displacement of approximately 11 million people. Both the army and the RSF face accusations of gross human rights violations, including sexual violence, obstruction of emergency aid, and the use of child soldiers. These accusations paint a grim picture of the human cost of the conflict and the urgent need for accountability and justice.
The situation remains dire for civilians caught in the crossfire.The Zamzam refugee camp near El Fasher, the last major city in Darfur not yet under militia control, is facing repeated attacks. The camp houses approximately half a million people and experienced a famine last year. The question remains whether the army, with its newly acquired strategic position, will be able to halt the violence in El Fasher and provide much-needed relief to the suffering population. The humanitarian crisis in Darfur is particularly acute, requiring urgent international attention and assistance.
Sudan’s Civil War: A turning Point or a Shifting Sandscape? An Exclusive Interview
“the recent recapture of El Obeid by the Sudanese army isn’t just a territorial gain; it signals a potential paradigm shift in the protracted conflict, but the situation remains incredibly volatile.”
Interviewer (World-Today-News.com): Dr. Anya Petrova, a leading expert on Sudanese politics and conflict resolution, welcome to World-Today-News.com. The Sudanese army’s recent recapture of El obeid from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has sparked significant international interest. Can you shed light on the strategic importance of this city and what this victory might signify for the overall conflict?
Dr. Petrova: Thank you for having me. El Obeid’s strategic significance is undeniable. Its central location, acting as a crucial link between Khartoum and South Darfur, a region largely controlled by the RSF, makes it a pivotal point in the conflict. The city also houses a critical air force base and an infantry division, representing a considerable military asset. This recapture by the Sudanese army, thus, represents a significant blow to the RSF’s logistical capabilities and control of key supply routes. While this is undoubtedly a victory for the army, it’s premature to declare it a turning point in the war. The conflict is far from over.
Interviewer: The conflict has been characterized by intense brutality and widespread human rights abuses by both sides. How has this impacted the civilian population, and what implications does the recent shift in power dynamics have for their safety and well-being?
Dr. Petrova: The impact on civilians has been catastrophic. Millions have been displaced, seeking refuge in overcrowded camps frequently enough facing dire humanitarian conditions characterized by shortages of food, water, and medical supplies, leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases. The conflict’s relentless violence, which includes reports of genocide, sexual violence, and the use of child soldiers by both the sudanese army and the RSF, has created a climate of fear and instability that affects every aspect of daily life. While the army’s gains may temporarily offer some respite in certain areas, the overall precarious security situation means civilian safety remains critically threatened, especially considering the RSF’s potential regrouping and escalation of attacks in response.Continued international humanitarian aid and pressure for accountability for war crimes are crucial.
Interviewer: Beyond the military aspects, what are the political and economic implications of this shifting balance of power in Sudan? How might this impact regional stability?
Dr. Petrova: The political ramifications are immense. The conflict has exposed deep-seated fault lines within sudanese society, exacerbated ethnic tensions, and challenged existing power structures. This power struggle is not merely a fight for territory; it’s a battle for political dominance, influencing future governance and the country’s trajectory. Economically, Sudan’s already fragile economy has been decimated by the conflict, hindering development and exacerbating existing poverty. The uncertainty surrounding the future power dynamic raises serious concerns about external investment and economic recovery. Regionally, Sudan’s instability can fuel cross-border conflicts and further complicate already tense relationships with neighboring countries.
Interviewer: What are the potential scenarios for the future of this conflict? What role can the international community play in facilitating a peaceful resolution?
Dr. Petrova: Several scenarios are possible. A prolonged stalemate with continued violence is sadly likely
Sudan’s Civil War: A Turning Point or a Shifting Sandscape? An Exclusive Interview
“The recent recapture of El Obeid is a notable military victory, but it’s crucial to avoid premature declarations of a turning point in this complex and brutal conflict.”
Interviewer (World-today-News.com): dr.Anya Petrova, a leading expert on Sudanese politics and conflict resolution, welcome to World-Today-news.com. The Sudanese army’s recent recapture of El Obeid from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has sparked significant international interest. Can you shed light on the strategic importance of this city and what this victory might signify for the overall conflict?
Dr. Petrova: thank you for having me. El Obeid’s strategic location is indeed critical.Its position as a vital link between Khartoum and South Darfur,a region largely under RSF control,makes it a pivotal control point for supply lines and troop movements. The city also houses key military assets, including an air force base and an infantry division. The Sudanese army’s recapture, therefore, represents a significant blow to the RSF’s logistical capabilities and their overall control of this crucial region.However, while this constitutes a significant military gain for the Sudanese army, it’s crucial to avoid viewing it as an automatic turning point in the larger conflict. The situation remains incredibly fluid and volatile.
Interviewer: The conflict has been characterized by intense brutality and widespread human rights abuses by both sides. How has this impacted the civilian population, and what implications does the recent shift in power dynamics have for their safety and well-being?
Dr. Petrova: The impact on civilians has been devastating. Millions have been displaced, creating a massive humanitarian crisis.These displaced populations often find themselves in overcrowded camps with limited access to essential resources such as food, water, and medical care, leading to outbreaks of disease and widespread suffering. The violence, including reports of atrocities like genocide, sexual violence, and the use of child soldiers by both the Sudanese army and the RSF, has created a climate of pervasive fear and uncertainty. While the army’s gains might offer some temporary reprieve in certain areas, the overall security situation remains precarious. Civilian safety continues to be gravely threatened, and the RSF’s potential for regrouping and retaliatory attacks remains a significant concern. Continued international humanitarian aid and a steadfast commitment to holding those responsible for war crimes accountable are absolutely crucial.
Interviewer: Beyond the military aspects,what are the political and economic implications of this shifting balance of power in Sudan? How might this impact regional stability?
Dr. Petrova: The political repercussions are profound. This conflict has exposed deep-seated societal fractures,fueled ethnic tensions,and fundamentally challenged existing power structures. This struggle is not solely about territory; it’s a battle for political control that will substantially shape sudan’s future governance. Economically, the conflict has severely damaged Sudan’s already fragile economy, impeding advancement and exacerbating existing poverty. The uncertainty surrounding the power dynamic raises serious concerns about foreign investment and the prospects for economic recovery. Regionally, Sudan’s instability is a source of concern, possibly fueling cross-border conflicts and destabilizing an already tense regional landscape.
interviewer: What are the potential scenarios for the future of this conflict? what role can the international community play in facilitating a peaceful resolution?
Dr. Petrova: Several scenarios are possible for the near future, including a protracted stalemate with continued violence, or a potential escalation of conflict. A negotiated settlement remains a vital objective. The international community has a crucial role to play in ensuring the delivery of humanitarian aid, holding those responsible for war crimes accountable, and fostering dialog between the warring parties that can pave the way towards a lasting cease-fire. This requires sustained diplomatic engagement, targeted pressure on those perpetuating the violence, and a commitment to a long-term peacebuilding strategy that addresses the root causes of the conflict.This includes supporting inclusive governance structures and fostering initiatives to promote reconciliation and healing within Sudanese society.
Interviewer: Thank you,Dr. Petrova, for your insightful analysis. This has been incredibly valuable.
Dr. Petrova: My pleasure. I hope the insights shared today help inform public understanding of Sudan’s multifaceted conflict.
Concluding Thoughts: The ongoing conflict in Sudan is a multifaceted crisis demanding urgent international attention and action. While the recent military advances offer a glimmer of hope, the path towards lasting peace and stability remains fraught with challenges. Share your thoughts on the future of Sudan in the comments below.