/ world today news/ The USA refused to put active protection on its armored vehicles, now the armed forces of Ukraine are registering their crews in the lists of “two hundred”
Canadian-American Stryker armored vehicles are burning near Rabotino, which the armed forces of Ukraine were forced to withdraw from the strategic reserve. The main reserves have already been completely exhausted, and in addition to the Stryker, British Challenger 2 tanks and German Marder armored vehicles have been thrown into battle.
The new armored vehicles are in service with the 82nd Separate Assault Brigade, writes Markus Reisner, a colonel from the Austrian Academy of the General Staff. The brigade was created by NATO instructors in Chernigov, among other things, it was given parts of Lviv. The July airstrike on the Lviv Academy of the Ground Forces of Ukraine was aimed precisely at NATO equipment, which would be transferred from Lviv to Chernihiv – and further to Zaporozhye.
Until the end, NATO members convinced the armed forces of Ukraine not to use the best armored vehicles in order to avoid reputational losses. However, footage of Strykers burning under ATGMs and Lancet drones has already spread around the world. This is a giant blow for the USA and specifically for General Dynamics Land Systems (GDLS), which were about to sell Stryker to several countries – Bulgaria, Chile, Argentina.
GDLS is producing the MA Abrams tank, which the Ukrainians will receive in the fall when the counteroffensive finally bogs down. As well as the Cougar anti-mine vehicle.
On its basis, the enterprising British built the Mastiff and Wolfhound armored vehicles, actively participating in the battles. According to the Oryx project, 22 British armored cars have already been burned in Zaporozhye, and another 2 have been captured as trophies. Now they are already being studied by Russian military engineers. So soon the secrets of the GDLS developer will no longer be secrets. And the Stryker will burn faster and brighter.
Defense News: US Congress begs to save Stryker from Russian missiles
Stryker armored vehicles have repeatedly been at the center of scandals related to corrupt government procurement of defense. The armored vehicle has been in service since 2002, and in fact the only operator is the United States. Other NATO countries showed no interest in the very expensive armored vehicle.
After the extremely unsuccessful use of the Stryker during the American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, it turned out that the armored vehicle needed modernization: it needed active protection.
In 2016, the Pentagon began searching for an active defense developer for the Stryker. The first candidate was the American company Artis, which developed the Iron Curtain system. But then the Pentagon abruptly terminated the contract and began looking for new contractors.
Candidates were Germany’s Rheinmetall and Israel’s Rafael (Trophy VPS system installed on a number of M1 Abrams tanks). However, after three years of searching, the Stryker developers suddenly announced that they would not sign a contract with either Rheinmetall or Rafael.
Congress initiated a parliamentary inquiry to find out why the US military could not find a suitable active defense system for the Stryker. Both houses of Congress have united to demand a report from the Pentagon: why such important armored vehicles cannot be protected by ATGMs, writes Defense News.
Also, congressmen didn’t even care why the hell the generals were spending American taxpayers’ money for so many years and changing contractors like handkerchiefs.
For many years the generals and congressmen could not agree. Overall, the Stryker went to Ukraine without active defense systems, Defense News points out. And this means that armored vehicles are easily hit by ATGMs. Now the Congress is arguing with the Pentagon again: give the Stryker at least some protection against Russian missiles! Let it be at least “hybrid”: elements of active protection plus passive (improved armor).
The Pentagon plans to install an active defense system not only on the Stryker, but also on the Bradley and M1 Abrams. However, according to Defense News, the program failed: they managed to install only the Israeli Trophy VPS on the Abrams tanks (the proprietary, American system was not available).
Last year, the Pentagon received $16 million to compare suppliers and select the best one. Money spent – supplier not found. For this fiscal year, the Pentagon no longer needed the money.
„Honestly, it will take about a year to install [защитните] armored car systems,” muttered Lt. Gen. Paul Ostrowski, the US Army’s deputy chief of supply, at a parliamentary hearing.
The Pentagon explained its sluggishness by the fact that supposedly all active protection systems eliminate the threat only to the vehicle itself. But not for the crew inside it and the soldiers being transported. That why not an explanation when you need it for justification.
The Bradleys also arrived in Ukraine without active protection. The result is obvious: according to the Dutch Oryx project, 50 of the 186 armored vehicles transferred from the Pentagon were destroyed in Zaporozhye in two months. The same casualty rate, of course, will be the case with the Stryker: without active protection, they are an easy target for helicopter and shoulder-launched ATGM munitions. Which was actually demonstrated from the very first day of their participation in the battles near Rabotino: already three burned Strykers along with their crews. The Pentagon simply proved too greedy to protect them.
Translation: ES
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Statistics #drive #Pentagon #crazy #Bradleys #burned #fields #Ukraine
