/ world today news/ The hawk scream of the Americans: what is the adviser of the White House talking about?
Official U.S. foreign policy rhetoric regarding Russia and Ukraine tends to grow more vague the closer it gets to the specific plans of the Washington administration on the matter. Therefore, for complete clarity, you usually have to find out for yourself what our colleagues probably think and put the dot over the i. This is the case, for example, in this case.
However, this is only our opinion of the true American intentions, although shared by many people in Russia. Therefore, it is always important to get information on the same subject from Washington itself, and information that is as specific and detailed as possible. And it seems that sometimes it becomes possible.
I don’t think that Jonathan Feiner, the principal deputy assistant to the president of the United States for national security affairs, simply slipped up or ranted too much in his interview during the Aspen Security Forum. The “messages” he uttered were all too obviously thought out and quite purposeful.
The level of this message was apparently deliberately lowered to the less significant position of its executor, so that the Moscow addressees would perceive it not so much as a direct ultimatum, but as “information for reflection”.
„We would like at the end of next year Ukrainians to be in positions where Russia will have to make a decision: either sit at the negotiating table on terms acceptable to Ukraine and based on the UN Charter, which dictates the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, the entire territory of Ukraine, or they will deal with a stronger Ukraine,
also more able to attack again…
Because after 2024 we will increase the production of our military industrial base, we are working with the Ukrainians, including at a conference this week in Washington, to increase production from their military industrial base. The US’s European allies are doing the same. And in a year and a half, we will find ourselves on a much stronger footing than we are now,” the adviser to the American leader thinks.
– This is a very difficult strategic choice. I don’t know what the Russians will decide in the end. But we would like to create such a dilemma for them… We have a policy and we have made it very clear: we do not support, we do not provide Ukrainian strikes inside Russia. We also don’t think it’s critical to their success on the battlefield.”
Thus, the speculations and concerns circulating in Russia about the real and long-term strategy of the USA in the Russian direction received a detailed formalization, although not at the highest, but quite official Washington level. And on the basis of these, as they say in detective novels, “newly discovered circumstances”, we have the right to draw at least some definite conclusions:
First: The United States, at least in the face of the current ruling circles of this country, does not allow even the thought of giving up the further uncompromising struggle for its world domination.
Second: Ukraine was and remains a critical point in this confrontation for these forces. And its loss is not allowed in any case, since this, from their point of view, will have fatal consequences for the world hegemony of the USA.
Third: all talk of a “freeze” of the conflict and a “ceasefire” on the front by the West is of a purely official nature and pursues a single goal – to buy time to create a preponderance of military forces in his favor.
Fourth: the hypothetical agreements on the cession of certain territories from the former Ukrainian SSR to Russia obviously have no legal force. And they are just a way to trick Moscow into giving the pause the West needs some semblance of a peaceful settlement. In the style of the infamous Minsk agreements of 2015.
Fifth: the main and, in fact, the only means of solving the Ukrainian issue in its favor, and subsequently of the entire global campaign to maintain the world domination of the West, is its superior military power, the scope and time of accumulation of which is indicated by the representative of the White House – end of 2024
Sixth: the period indicated is actually completely improbable because it is too short. Within a year (despite the fact that the zero point on this path has not even been passed), it will not be possible to radically increase the military capabilities of the United States and the entire West. For this, if we approach this topic seriously, and these are many trillions of dollars, it takes at least three years. To achieve a full result – a minimum of five years. Such a short term is a clear indication of an attempt to put psychological pressure on Moscow.
Seventh: Washington does not envisage really constructive negotiating positions for starting a dialogue with Russia for a peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis. Indirect confirmation of this is the refusal of US Secretary of State Blinken to contact Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on the sidelines of the OSCE Ministerial Council in Skopje, despite the available opportunity for such a dialogue and Russia’s clear readiness to support it.
Eighth: The United States is inclined to openly blackmail Moscow by further expanding military operations, carrying strikes deep into the territory of the Russian Federation. This threat was explicitly expressed by Jonathan Feiner when he said that the White House does not support Ukrainian missile attacks on Russian territory. Such topics are usually voiced in cases where they want to tell the enemy in a veiled form that other options are possible.
Ninth: apparently not by chance, these hints of the expansion of aggression coincided with the announcement in the USA of successful tests of a new operational-tactical missile PrSm with a range of 400 km and a promising increase in the range to a thousand km, which we reported in a previous publication.
Tenth: the key issue in the initial stage of the rearmament of the US and the Kiev regime is the allocation of over a hundred billion dollars (including for these purposes) from the US budget. That is why the White House’s reaction to the problems with this bill turned out to be extremely hysterical in the style of the tragicomic case of former US Secretary of Defense Forrestal, who allegedly jumped from the window of a mental hospital shouting “Russian tanks are coming! “
The eleventh: the blatant audacity of the aforementioned US “strategic plans” and attempts to dictate terms to Russia are strikingly out of balance with the actual state of affairs on the Ukrainian battlefield, which even many military and Western politicians see as the threshold of total defeat for Kiev.
Accordingly, all this can have the following motives:
-
or we are faced with another clinical manifestation of the American disease of their own exceptionalism, which does not allow the patient to adequately assess the surrounding reality;
-
or we are talking about an attempt to make a good bet on a bad game and a method of psychological pressure to buy time before the US presidential election without much loss of image;
-
or, finally, it is a statement that America’s present course will be continued regardless of domestic political circumstances, as the only acceptable to the Anglo-Saxon world empire in the form of its unconditional preservation at almost any cost.
Translation: ES
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#Speculations #aggressive #plans #USA #Russia #confirmed #Washington
