South Africa‘s Competition Commission Targets Google, Meta, and X for Media Compensation
Table of Contents
Johannesburg, South Africa – The Competition Commission is advocating for Google to “compensate” South African news media with an annual payment ranging from R300 million to R500 million over the next three to five years. This proposal is a key finding in the commission’s provisional report, the result of a 16-month market inquiry into media and digital platforms. The commission’s scrutiny extends beyond google, encompassing Meta Platforms, X (formerly Twitter), and other prominent tech and social media companies. The commission has also warned that non-cooperation from these targeted companies could lead to a levy of 5-10% on the tech giants to benefit the local media industry.
The inquiry underscores the evolving dynamics between tech giants and news organizations, particularly concerning content distribution and monetization in the digital age. The Competition Commission’s investigation seeks to address what it perceives as an imbalance in the value exchange between these entities.
Demands on Meta and X
The commission’s recommendations include specific actions for Meta Platforms and X. The commission is urging Meta to reverse its strategy of de-prioritizing news content on Facebook. The goal is “to restore referral traffic to the media from its peak with at least a 100% increase in referral traffic.” Similarly, the commission demands that Elon musk’s X and Meta “cease de-prioritising news with links in the user feed.” These demands signal a potential clash with global tech giants, which have previously resisted similar proposals in other regions.
Tech companies often argue for algorithmic control and the freedom to manage content on their platforms. However, regulators are increasingly scrutinizing these practices, citing concerns about the impact on news diversity and the financial viability of media organizations.
Google’s Role and Proposed Remedies
The Competition Commission’s focus on Google includes a suggestion for the internet giant to pay up to R500 million annually. This payment aims to correct what the commission describes as the “imbalance in shared value while putting in place changes to search that will sustainably create shared value with the media through increases in referral traffic.”
The commission’s statement further elaborates on the need for google to address biases in its search algorithms. “This includes the removal of search bias in favour of foreign media and YouTube, and the promotion of vernacular and community media,” the commission stated. This aspect of the recommendation underscores the importance of promoting local content and ensuring that diverse voices are represented in search results.
Additional Findings and Recommendations
The Competition Commission’s draft report contains several other key recommendations aimed at reshaping the digital media landscape in south Africa:
- YouTube Monetization: The commission suggests that YouTube should enhance the ability of media outlets and broadcasters, including the SABC, to monetize their content. This includes increasing the revenue share to 70% and actively promoting higher-value direct sales by the media.
- Misinformation and Platform Liability: To combat the spread of misinformation, the commission recommends amending the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act to introduce platform liability for harmful content and the amplification of misinformation.The proposal also suggests that social media platforms partner with and compensate the media for fact-checking efforts.
- data Sharing: The commission proposes that search and social media platforms share richer anonymized user data related to news content engagement. This data would enable media organizations to gain improved insights into their audiences and enhance monetization strategies.
- AI and Content Deals: The commission addresses the emerging role of artificial intelligence, recommending that “the media should be allowed to negotiate collectively with artificial intelligence companies for content deals to train AI chatbots.” In the absence of such agreements,the commission suggests measures to prevent AI chatbots from favoring global media partners and to drive referral traffic to local news media.
The commission emphasizes the critical role of news media in a democratic society. “The news media is essential for free expression and democracy,informing citizens and holding institutions accountable. Globally,the media industry is undergoing rapid change due to the shift to online news consumption,challenging customary revenue models and necessitating changes to buisness models,” the commission stated.
The commission acknowledges the challenges faced by the media industry due to digitalization but asserts that these challenges are “exacerbated by the conduct of platforms that hinder the ability of the news media to secure and monetise digital traffic.” The commission further notes that “these digital platforms do not produce news themselves and cannot replace journalism’s role.”
The media should be allowed to negotiate collectively with AI companies for content deals to train AI chatbots.
The Competition Commission recognizes the complexity of the issues at hand and has emphasized that its findings and proposed remedies are provisional. “Notably the findings and remedies are provisional and that further submissions, evidence and engagements with the inquiry following the release of the provisional report may result in changes to these findings, recommendations and remedies,” the commission stated.
Stakeholder Input and Next Steps
Stakeholders and the public have until April 7, 2025, to submit their responses to the inquiry regarding the provisional findings, proposed remedies, and recommendations. This period of consultation is crucial for gathering diverse perspectives and ensuring that the final recommendations are well-informed and effective.
The outcome of this inquiry could have notable implications for the future of news media in south Africa and perhaps serve as a model for other countries grappling with similar challenges in the digital age.
Big Tech vs. the Press: Is South Africa’s Crackdown on Google, Meta, and X a Blueprint for the Future of News?
“The battle for the future of journalism isn’t just about clicks and shares; it’s about the very survival of independent news sources in the digital age.” This bold assertion from media expert, Dr. Anya Sharma, sets the stage for a crucial conversation about South Africa’s groundbreaking inquiry into the relationship between tech giants and news media.
World today News (WTN): Dr. Sharma, South Africa’s Competition Commission is proposing significant financial compensation from tech giants like Google, Meta, and X for news media. Why is this such a groundbreaking move?
Dr. Sharma: The Competition Commission’s action in South Africa is indeed unprecedented.It directly addresses the growing power imbalance between tech platforms and news publishers. For years, tech companies have profited massively from the distribution of news content, often without adequately compensating the entities that create this content. The proposed compensation, ranging from hundreds of millions of Rand annually, signifies a potential shift in this dynamic. The inquiry acknowledges that the value exchange between tech platforms and news media is fundamentally unequal. this isn’t merely about financial restitution; it highlights the systemic issue of content exploitation that affects the financial viability of independent journalism globally.
WTN: The inquiry goes beyond monetary compensation,advocating for changes in algorithms and content prioritization. Can you elaborate on the importance of these demands concerning referral traffic and algorithmic bias?
Dr. Sharma: The demands to increase referral traffic and address algorithmic bias are critical for ensuring a level playing field. Tech companies’ algorithms substantially influence user engagement and content visibility. If these algorithms consistently favor large, international news organizations or prioritize sensationalized content over in-depth journalism, it can severely stifle smaller, local media outlets and perhaps reduce news diversity. Demands for algorithm openness and adjustments to prioritize local and diverse voices are essential for fostering a healthy media ecosystem. By requiring an increase in referral traffic from their platforms many sources of news and facts may benefit.
WTN: The report also touches upon the role of AI and it’s impact on news content. How significant is this emerging challenge, and what are potential solutions?
Dr. Sharma: The integration of AI in news production and consumption is rapidly evolving. AI-powered chatbots, for example, are trained on vast amounts of data, including news content. If this data primarily comes from large global media groups, such chatbots might develop biases in their responses, further marginalizing local news sources. Thus, the commission’s recommendation that media outlets collectively negotiate content deals with AI companies to train AI chatbots is a forward-thinking strategy. This collective bargaining power allows the local media to protect their interests and ensure their content is fairly represented in increasingly complex technology.
WTN: The case of South Africa has implications beyond its borders. What lessons can other countries learn from this inquiry?
Dr. Sharma: South Africa’s inquiry offers a valuable blueprint for other nations grappling with the similar challenges of balancing the power between media and technology companies. The specific financial compensation amounts might differ depending on a country’s size and economic context, but the overarching principles remain universally relevant. Key takeaways for other countries include:
The need for thorough investigations into the relationship between tech giants and news media.
The importance of addressing algorithmic bias and content prioritization.
Considering regulatory frameworks that address the financial sustainability of journalism.
Addressing the emerging implications of AI in content creation and distribution.
WTN: What’s the most critically important lesson to be learned about the future of journalism based on this South African inquiry?
Dr. Sharma: The south African inquiry underscores the urgent need for a collaborative approach — involving governments, regulators, tech companies, and news organizations — to ensure a future where independent journalism thrives in the digital age. It’s not simply about regulating tech giants; it’s about fostering an surroundings that supports diverse, reliable, and accessible news sources critical for a healthy democracy. We must move beyond simply lamenting the decline of the traditional media model and embrace strategic, innovative solutions to ensure a future where a thriving news ecosystem is both economically viable and essential to a functioning society.
WTN: Thank you, Dr.Sharma, for providing such insightful analysis.
**What are your thoughts on the South African Competition Commission’s inquiry and its potential global impact? Share your opinions in the comments below or join the conversation on social media using #BigTechvsNews.