Reporter Yoon Sang-geun | 2023.08.03 19:05
/Photo = Son Seung-yeon
Singer and musical actor Son Seung-yeon, who was summoned over the “lookalike controversy” with Ahn Seong-il, CEO of Dougibus, regarding the agency conflict surrounding the girl group Fifty Fifty, seems to be giving selective answers without further clarification regarding his suspicions.
On the 3rd, Son Seung-yeon revealed the cast schedule for the musical ‘Memphis’ she joined. Son Seung-yeon announced that she would continue her activities regardless of the recent controversy surrounding herself, starting on September 20th at the ‘Memphis’ performance.
/Photo = Son Seung-yeon
However, even after Son Seung-yeon explained the suspicion of tampering with CEO Ahn Seong-il, who was at the center of the controversy over the Fifty Fifty incident, through an interview with YouTuber Lee Jin-ho, he did not respond to the raised suspicion.
/Photo = Son Seung-yeon
Regarding the controversy surrounding him on July 24, Son Seung-yeon said, “I’m trying to understand, saying that those who only see and listen to the one-sided edited stance and data and swear at me can be like that as much as possible.” No. The staff who helped me in difficult times, many managers, and even the people I worked with for a short time know the truth, so I thought it was right to keep silent about the past and move on, but I don’t think it’s wise to just endure it. I hope you think carefully about personal attacks, criticism and swear words and leave them behind.”
Son Seung-yeon was summoned for suspicion of tampering with her current affiliate, Ahn Seong-il, CEO of Dugibus, as well as suspicion of resemblance to Fifty Fifty, who is continuing a legal battle with her agency, Attract, further raising the wave.
Through her official position at the time, Son Seung-yeon strongly refuted the controversy over the exclusive contract conflict with her former agency, Fortune, and said, “The exclusive contract between Fortune and Son Seung-yeon was legally terminated as a result of not providing the payment or settlement statement for several months.” Contrary to the promise, when Fortune received the personal bankbook, it withdrew the balance and did not provide a statement of settlement or pay the settlement money.So, Son Seung-yeon requested the fulfillment of the settlement obligation again, but Fortune did not fulfill this at all, so the exclusive contract was notified. As a result, the exclusive contract was terminated.”
/Photo = Son Seung-yeon
Son Seung-yeon’s side also said, “Even though Fortune had no intention of maintaining the exclusive contract, they did not disclose the details of the settlement or pay the settlement money, and filed a lawsuit for damages due to Son Seung-yeon’s contract termination lawsuit, but nothing was done properly. As a result, in August 2017, Son Seung-yeon’s provisional injunction against obstruction of entertainment activities was cited for the second time, and afterward, Fortune appealed against the decision, but the High Court dismissed Fortune’s appeal, citing all Son Seung-yeon’s arguments. “he added.
However, Fortune strongly refuted, saying, “It is said that Fortune did not fulfill its settlement obligations at all, but this is a 100% lie.” I asked him to decide where he would go because his personality was decided, but he insisted on paying only the settlement money without a definite answer for two months, so he filed a lawsuit for damages.”
An official said, “At the time, the court made a decision to mediate through the damages lawsuit, and later, rather, Son Seung-yeon filed a lawsuit for a provisional injunction against obstruction of entertainment activities in August 2017. He also emphasized that it was clearly acknowledged that he had refused to pursue entertainment activities.” In particular, in the case of non-payment of settlement, he explained, “Because the lawsuit was in progress at the time, the payment was also held in a situation where the management function was virtually stopped.” .
<저작권자 © ‘리얼타임 연예스포츠 속보,스타의 모든 것’ 스타뉴스, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지>
