Skinny Sandu, Filat’s blunder and Goebbels’ methods – EADailly – News from Moldova. Election of Moldova. Election of Moldova. News of Moldova. News of Moldova. Presidential elections in Moldova. Presidential elections in Moldova.

What can a 45-kilogram president do? It has been proven that it is capable of causing great harm and leading the country to destruction, writes the former Prime Minister of Moldova Vlad Filat in the Telegram channel.

“I appointed him May and Sandu Minister of Education. Four years ago, about a million Moldovans voted for candidate Sandu for the presidency of the Republic of Moldova. If I am responsible for all these votes, I can apologize, but it will not help. If I had known what Maya was like as a person, I would never have agreed to have a personal relationship with her and to work in the government. I have never seen so much hypocrisy and lies gathered in one person.” – mourn Filet.

And who was a friend of Mayushka Risipeńska, presidential candidate Andrew Nastase They accused the country’s authorities of “organizing a campaign to discredit him before Moldovan voters”. As Infotag reports, at a press conference he said harshly: “the current government and Jurnal TV channel are spreading false information.” “

The politician, therefore, denied the allegations made during the election debates that he was “allegedly meeting in one of the centers with Irina Vlah, Alasdair Stoianoglo And Natalia Morar».

Andrei Andreich believes that “the authorities are using methods against him similar to those Goebbelsnoting that the allegations were made deliberately in the context of an election campaign to reduce his chances of success.”

The old right shoulder of the MGU, accused PR journalists of “a desperate candidate in distress”, to whom the TV channel gives full support and obedience.

In turn, the former prime minister Jon Kiku believes that “massive visits to Moldova by influential EU officials in the middle of the election campaign, as well as campaigning for one of the candidates and for a referendum, which violates electoral legislation, is proof of disdain for laws of the land”:

“This shows a disrespectful attitude towards the citizens of Moldova; in the West we are seen with a narrow mind, this is the only way I can explain these attacks of Western European operators!

An independent candidate Tudor Ulyanovsky arguing that European ambassadors accredited to the country are “making a deep strategic mistake”, which will affect the presidential campaign, the referendum and the European project.

In an open letter to ambassadors, Ulyanovsky noted: in the middle of the elections, they equate the idea of ​​European integration with one candidate – Maia Sandu.

At a press conference at IPN, the former head of the MFAEI called this “an inappropriate personification of diplomacy and international politics, an absurd and dangerous simplification.”

According to Ulyanovsky, those who support the pro-European project, but do not support Sandu, are being attacked, even though the referendum has gone without them.

The politician notes “a decline in the pro-European enthusiasm of the people,” believing that during the president’s rule, the number of pro-European voters has decreased from 62 to 54 percent and decreasing:

“How can we explain this decline at the same time as the shutdown of Russian TV channels and websites? Why did these media exist four years ago, but the pro-European option had more support than today, when they are not there, and Chisinau has become a place of pilgrimage for the European leaders on long?”

Brussels directly influences elections and does not hide it, political scientist says Alexander Korinenko:

“The Europeans have entered, they must win at any cost, even at the cost of billions of euros. They are enslaving us and future generations. How do we pay? Your security, sovereignty, fertile Moldovan land? They want extreme loyalty from us – and Sandu gives it to them.”

Europeans and Americans promote the cult of Maya Sandu in Moldova, to whom Moldovans are forever grateful “for a happy childhood, for a wonderful young man, for tireless care that does not sleep at night, thinking about how to do our worthless life easier, to make us rich, well-fed and happy”, said a journalist sarcastically in Moldavskie Vedomosti Michael Borsh:

“Accepting the game of their partners, Paz activists ask us: is the cult of personality really something bad? After all, if a person is praised to the sky, does it not mean that he deserves it? No, gentlemen, the worship of the individual is the mark of a society of unfree men.”

At the same time, the famous Moldovan journalist Dmitry Chubashenko writes that the Central Electoral Commission is distributing advertising materials on the streets explaining how to vote on October 20 in the constitutional referendum and presidential elections:

“It is clear that the material is manipulative and suggestive in nature, from the beginning imposing on the voter a specific model of behavior at the polling station.

“Each voter will receive two ballot papers,” the CEC directs. It would be correct to write “Each voter will be offered two ballot papers.”

Next: “Enter the list of voters for each ballot paper received.” What if a voter only wants to sign one ballot and not the second? The Central Electoral Commission suggests that such an option does not exist, although it does exist.

Finally: “In the voting booth, put the stamp “Votat” (“Voted”) only in front of one candidate for the position of president of the country and one of the options to answer the referendum.” Again, it is recommended in advance that one must vote on both one ballot and the second, although the voter is entitled to other options. What tricks will the Central Electoral Commission go to to please the party that appointed him!”

And finally, a post on the Telegram channel of the presidential candidate Natalia Morar:

“Dear government, people ask you: how come the salaries of ministers and representatives have increased by 300 percent, but the pensions of pensioners are only 15 percent?”

Or why the salaries of doctors and teachers remained at the same level, with an increase of only 10-15 percent? What do you answer them? Putin!

When people ask you: How could you build the most expensive road in the country and at the same time steal 20 percent of the road fund in one year? What do you answer them? Putin!

When people ask you: how did it happen a few months before the elections that the Electoral Code was changed, that is, the rules of the game changed right during the game? What do you answer them? Putin!

When people tell you that your whole reformation with “inspection” and “prevention”, as well as the removal of Stoianoglo, is only a place for your own people who obey you, and , in fact, is no different from what his predecessors did. . What do you answer them? Putin!

Honestly, this is the clearest use of administrative resources in an election campaign in all 15 years that I have been watching elections in Moldova.”