Home » News » Sirius XM found liable in New York lawsuit over subscription cancellation

Sirius XM found liable in New York lawsuit over subscription cancellation

A New York state judge has found Sirius XM Holdings liable in the lawsuit filed by New York State Attorney General Letitia James, who accused the streaming and satellite radio company that they made canceling subscriptions too difficult for customers.

While denying allegations of fraud and deceptive practices, Justice Lyle Frank of the State Supreme Court in Manhattan said Sirius’ policies violated the federal Online Consumer Confidence Restoration Act) .

Judge Frank said Sirius made canceling subscriptions “clearly easier” than signing up, by requiring subscribers to speak at length with agents trained to stop cancellations, and to listen to up to five offers from other services before license was suspended.

The judge said Sirius must change its cancellation practices to comply with the law and pay unspecified damages.

Sirius said Friday it would appeal the Nov. 21 decision.

It also said it would comply with a US Federal Trade Commission rule requiring companies to cancel subscriptions as easily as signing up. The “click to delete” rule will take effect on January 14, 2025.

Last December, James sued Sirius, claiming that the company’s data in New York showed that subscribers took an average of 11 1/2 minutes to cancel their subscriptions over the phone. and 30 minutes to cancel their subscriptions online.

She said Sirius could cancel subscriptions with the click of a button, or let customers do it themselves.

“My office sued SiriusXM to protect consumers, and as a result of our actions, the company must streamline its termination process to stop New Yorkers,” Ms. James said in a statement Friday.

2024-11-22 15:17:00
#Sirius #liable #York #lawsuit #subscription #cancellation

* **How might the “click-to-delete” rule, as applied to SiriusXM, influence the design of cancellation processes for other subscription-based online services?**

Here are some open-ended interview questions based on the article, organized ​thematically:

**I. Understanding the Legal Case ⁤& Consumer Protection**

*‌ What are your initial​ thoughts on the judge’s ruling against Sirius XM? Do you think it was ​a ⁣fair decision? Why or⁢ why not?

* Do you agree with⁣ the Attorney General’s stance that making ​cancellation difficult constitutes unfair business practices? Where ‍do you draw the line between inconvenience and deliberate deception?

* This case centers around the​ Online Consumer Confidence Restoration Act. How important are laws like this in today’s digital age, where subscription services are ​ubiquitous?

**II. Examining SiriusXM’s Practices & Response**

* SiriusXM argues that canceling subscriptions was “clearly easier” than ‍signing up. What are your thoughts on⁣ their strategy⁤ of requiring customers to speak with agents and⁣ listen to offers before canceling? ‌Is ‍this a ‌common practice among other companies?

* SiriusXM has stated they will comply with the new “click to delete” rule. ‍Do you ⁤think this is a genuine change in‌ their approach or merely a compliance measure? How will this ⁣rule ⁤impact both businesses and consumers moving forward?

* What responsibility do companies have to ensure their cancellation processes are transparent and⁤ user-friendly? Should there be stricter regulations regarding subscription cancellation?

**III. Broader Implications for Consumers & Businesses**

* Have you personally experienced⁢ difficulty canceling any subscriptions in⁤ the ​past? Share your story ‌and what made the process ⁣challenging.

* Do you think this lawsuit will set⁣ a precedent for other ‍cases involving subscription cancellation practices? What message does it send to both businesses and consumers?

* How can consumers be more empowered when dealing with subscription services that may⁣ have complex or ‌frustrating cancellation policies?

**IV. Looking‍ Ahead & Ethical⁢ Considerations**

* What are the ethical considerations involved in designing subscription services and cancellation processes? Where should the balance ⁢lie between business‌ interests and consumer rights?

* Beyond legal compliance, what moral​ obligations do companies have to their customers, particularly when it comes to ​transparency and ease of ‍cancellation?

* Do you think there’s a risk of “subscription fatigue” as⁤ we increasingly rely on digital services? What role can regulations and ethical business practices play in addressing this concern?

These questions are ​designed to promote a nuanced and insightful discussion on the SiriusXM ‌case and its broader implications for consumers and businesses in the digital age.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.