Shooting shoes indoors, destroying mirrors … Lending an actor’s annoying behavior and accusing the studio “Indignation at dishonest response”: J-CAST News[Full text display]

• Daisuke Utsumi (from the dance vocal group “FIZZY POP (natural carbonic acid)” to which he belonged)

–

–

Denied the use of shoes, but on Instagram …

According to the owner who interviewed on the evening of the 10th, Mr. Utsumi reserved and used the studio between 13:00 and 17:00 on the 8th. However, he said he went to check the situation because he could not confirm the exit even after the usage time.

Then, it was confirmed that the floor was dirty and the mirror was broken, which seemed to be walking in the room with shoes. Mr. Utsumi explained that he would accept compensation for the mirror, but he did not use it on shoes that violated the terms of use. Although the story was in a disorganized state, the studio had the next plan, so we exchanged contacts and broke up.

After that, when the owner browsed Mr. Utsumi’s Instagram, he was able to confirm that he was shooting with his feet. Then, I was able to confirm by comparing the video and audio of the security cameras installed in the space.

Therefore, the owner asked Mr. Utsumi to explain about the extension of the usage time, the destruction of the appearance, and the use of shoes at 6 am on the following day.

“Please be sure to tell us your thoughts by 15:00 on February 9th. If you do not receive a reply by 15:00 on February 9th, we will prepare for the complaint. (Omitted)
In any case, after asking Mr. Utsumi’s thoughts, I would like to inform you about future movements and complaints about business compensation and damage to property. “(Email sent by the owner to Mr. Utsumi)

In this email, the owner also explains the estimated cost of restoring the studio to its original state.

–

“Public question” on Twitter

Then, in the afternoon of the same day, Mr. Utsumi called me to apologize.

However, he answered that he would not accept compensation for the use of shoes, although he would pay for the extension fee and the appearance. He also requested that a photo be sent to verify that the footprints left in the studio match the shape of Mr. Utsumi’s shoes, but he said he never received it.

The owner sent an e-mail with the actual quotation requested by Mr. Utsumi and explained it again by telephone, but the story was not settled.

“The photographer is wearing shoes, but since I am a costume shoe and I parked the car nearby and walked only about 15 steps, there is a mystery theory that the sole is beautiful, so I decided that conversation and negotiations were difficult.”

He said that he did not respond to the request for written communication in order to keep a record, and he could not get a convincing answer by telephone oral explanation.

So the owner posted about this event on Twitter around 3:30 pm. Around 20:00, I sent a direct reply to Mr. Utsumi saying, “I feel angry at the dishonest response,” and asked for an explanation about the use of shoes.

I received an email from Mr. Utsumi agreeing to pay …

Has there been any progress since these tweets?

According to the owner, Mr. Utsumi received an e-mail and a phone call agreeing to pay after 15:00, but the negotiations broke down at that point because he did not receive a reply by the date and time he had informed in advance. However, he said he did not reply.

“Negotiations were not completed by the predetermined deadline of 15:00 on February 9th. It is difficult to respond even if I receive a sudden call because I have a job, and of course there is no answer on Twitter that I requested. Telephone There was a word of apology, but I felt that it was a negotiation that I could not pay the cleaning fee with the body of apology.
I think that a drop-off point is necessary for negotiations, so I prepared a drop-off point in stages, but it was completely missed. Unfortunately, I have not been sincerely responding to the damage since I was injured, so unfortunately I have to prepare for the complaint on schedule. Now I go to the police station and talk to a lawyer through an acquaintance. “

The owner reportedly consulted with a lawyer on the 10th, saying that the property was damaged. Regarding the future, he replied, “As long as I have informed Mr. Utsumi that I will file a complaint, I think that I will be able to complete the task as planned.”

J-CAST News has also applied to Mr. Utsumi for coverage of this matter by e-mail, but there was no response as of 20:00 on the 10th.

– .