Sharon’s murder case; Transmission of CI voice mail without authorization; It can backfire

Parashala CI’s justification that there was no loophole in the investigation into the Sharon murder case could backfire. The defense could be armed with an explanation that no trace of pesticide was found in Sharon’s blood sample. CI without the permission of the police chief. Main sources also said that the voice message containing Hemant’s explanation was released.

The investigation was entrusted to the criminal section after assessing that the Parashala police, who had initially investigated the case, had made serious mistakes. It was clear that this decision of the rural SP was correct and further actions including the arrest of the accused. Meanwhile, Parashala’s CI Hemand Kumar sent a voice message to the media misinterpreting the investigation results to justify that the Parashala police did not fail and the criminal section’s own team assesses that they will backfire in the case. It is said in the message that the police became aware of the information after 7 days after administering poison to Sharon and the medical college authorities informed the information. Relatives approach the police. He explains that Sharon did not express any mystery in her statement.

CI also claims that there is a medical report in which no trace of the pesticide was found. The investigation team believes these defense arguments will backfire in court. Prominent sources said the former investigating agent’s purpose to circulate this voice message in favor of the defense without the investigating officer’s permission is also questionable. The family has decided to file a complaint against the CI on the matter.

Sharon’s family can file a complaint against the CI parasite