Home » today » World » Sharon Linda Adams: Face of serial rape hoaxer (53) after she is convicted of latest bogus claim

Sharon Linda Adams: Face of serial rape hoaxer (53) after she is convicted of latest bogus claim

Sharon Linda Adams: Lengthy History of Hoax Calls to Police

In a troubling case that reveals a decade-long pattern of deception, Sharon Linda Adams, 53, from Frederick Place, has been exposed as a “prolific hoax caller” to the police. This week at Craigavon Magistrates Court, she pleaded guilty to new charges related to false claims of rape, marking yet another chapter in her history of fabricating emergencies that have wasted police resources. This article delves into the details of her actions, the judicial responses, and the effects on both law enforcement and the community.

A Decade of False Reports

Sharon Adams has been making false calls to the police for over ten years, with her most recent offenses occurring within mere months of each other in 2022. In July, she reported being raped by an unknown male, and merely three months later, she repeated this claim. Alarmingly, court records reveal an extensive history of similar incidents dating back to 2014, including multiple false reports of assault and rape that have ultimately led to substantial misuse of police time and resources.

  • 2014 Incidents:
    • April 26: False report of rape and assault.
    • May 1: Claimed she was stabbed and kicked.
    • May 22: Reported another alleged rape.
    • Additional false claims followed throughout the year.

This pattern of deceit proved so persistent that previous court decisions, including a short three-month jail sentence, failed to deter her from continuing her hoax calls.

The Court’s Response

Earlier rulings highlighted the severity of her actions. In 2021, during a sentencing hearing, Deputy District Judge Chris Holmes expressed frustration, stating that Adams should face a 14-year sentence instead of the proposed six months. “This is by far the worst I have seen,” he stated, illustrating the broader implications of her actions on local law enforcement. One in five police officers in the area had reportedly been dispatched to deal with her false claims, risking their availability for genuine emergencies.

District Judge Michael Ranaghan addressed the court once again this week, recognizing the futility of the previous measures taken against Adams, which ranged from probation to incarceration. “Just about everything has been tried from probation to prison sentences. Nothing seems to work,” he noted during court proceedings.

String of Hoax Calls Discovered

In July and October of 2022, police responded to frantic reports from Adams, who initially called herself “Samantha.” In her distress calls, she created elaborate narratives surrounding her safety that proved to be entirely fabricated. During the first incident, police searched multiple locations and called an ambulance based on her claims, only to find her at her home, highly intoxicated but uninjured.

In a second incident during the ongoing investigation, Adams attempted to retract her claims yet again, illustrating a troubling disregard for the seriousness of the actions she reported. This behavior not only endangered potential victims but also diverted valuable resources away from those who genuinely needed police assistance.

The Societal Impact

The consequences of Adams’s hoax calls rippled throughout the community, highlighting a significant strain on law enforcement agencies. In an age when emergency responders need to prioritize genuine calls, such misuse can alter the efficacy and response times critical to public safety.

Experts in criminal justice suggest that consistent patterns of hoax calling could necessitate a review of how authorities handle false reporting and mental health evaluations for repeat offenders. “Law enforcement must balance public safety with the need to address underlying psychological issues,” remarked a local law enforcement spokesperson.

Adams’s case starkly serves as a reminder of the importance of using emergency services responsibly. Her actions have not only threatened community safety but prompted discussions about how to identify and support individuals who demonstrate a pattern of such irresponsible behavior.

Next Steps

With a scheduled court date set for February 12, the legal system will once again evaluate Adams’s future. The judge has deferred sentencing, allowing her the opportunity to demonstrate that she can refrain from further troubling behavior. Given her history, however, many community members remain skeptical about whether genuine change is possible.

Sharon Linda Adams’s story isn’t solely one of legal implications; it emphasizes the broader societal impact of such behavior and the need for proactive measures to address similar occurrences. Fluidity between mental health support and law enforcement could pave the way forward in reducing cases of false reporting that pull resources from those who need them the most.


Feel free to leave your thoughts about this case in the comments below. Do you believe more should be done to prevent hoax calls to emergency services? Share your opinion!

For further reading on issues related to police resource utilization, check out our articles on [Misuse of Emergency Services] and [Understanding Psychological Disorders Impacting Criminal Behavior].

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.