The journalist revealed information that had been jealously guarded and network users expressed their support for the accused.
At the end of July of this year, doctor Octavio Arroyo, better known as Mr. Doctor, made a video in which he criticized the suggestion that graphologist MaryFer Centeno made to use a blue pen to lose weight.
In the digital creator’s video, he gave the reasons why he considered the method a fallacy, in addition to considering the expert as a charlatan.
Read also: Luis Enrique Guzmán breaks the silence and gives a heartbreaking message from his mother Silvia Pinal
According to the version of the collaborator of the Hoy program, the words used in the recording made her uncomfortable and she saw them as false, which is why she filed a complaint for gender violence and not the content as such.
In that sense, this Friday, November 28, the hearing between the lady and the gentleman was scheduled, but a change of dates caused both of them to see each other until next January 12, 2025.
Although the legal altercation between the YouTubers has not yet begun, journalist Shanik Berman has already managed the large reparation sum that the Puebla doctor must pay to the teacher:
“Mr. Doctor is going to have to pay you 60 million pesos, that is the demand, have I already released it? MaryFer is going to be angry, but oh well,” the driver pointed out punctually.
Meanwhile, Internet users show their support for the scholar with messages:
“I support Mr. Doctor, they are abusing him,” “MaryFer is a charlatan and the doctor only exposed her,” the fans pointed out.
video/7442373639128829240" class="tiktok-embed" data-video-id="7442373639128829240" style="max-width: 605px;min-width: 325px;">@notimic **Shanik Berman Talks about Maryfer Centeno’s Lawsuit against Mr. Doctor** The journalist and host Shanik Berman recently spoke about the lawsuit filed by Maryfer Centeno against Mr. Doctor, revealing shocking details about the legal situation in which she finds herself the influencer doctor. According to Berman, Mr. Doctor faces a claim of 60 million pesos and is “very scared” because he does not have the amount to cover the claim. Berman added that Maryfer Centeno’s relationship with the judicial system could play a key role in the outcome of the trial. According to the host, Centeno maintains a close relationship with numerous judges, which, in her opinion, gives her a considerable advantage in the legal process. “Maryfer is friends with all the judges, they all love her,” Berman stated, suggesting that this factor could make it difficult for Mr. Doctor to win the lawsuit against him. The legal situation has become a topic of great public interest, since the amount demanded is considerable and Berman’s statements fuel the perception that the legal battle is heavily tilted in favor of Maryfer Centeno. However, a final ruling has not yet been issued, so the final resolution could change depending on the development of the case. With images by Leslie Alamilla. @Shanik Berman #notimic #redcarpet #pinkcarpet #media #maryfercenteno #mrdoctor #shanikberman #exclusive original sound – Noti-Mic
## Graphology, Gender and Online Justice: An Interview with Legal Expert
**World-Today-News.com: ** The ongoing legal battle between Dr. octavio Arroyo (“Mr.doctor”) and graphologist MaryFer Centeno has sparked intense debate online and raised important questions about free speech, gender-based violence allegations, and the power of online platforms. Too shed light on this complex case,we are joined today by renowned legal expert [**Insert Expert Name and Credentials Here**].
**Welcome, [Expert name].**
**Expert:** Thank you for having me.
**WTN:** Let’s start with the basics. Dr. Arroyo publicly criticized Ms. Centeno’s weight-loss method, calling it a “fallacy” and labeling her a “charlatan.” Ms. Centeno, in response, filed a complaint for gender-based violence. Can you explain how criticizing someone’s professional opinions online can be perceived as gender-based violence?
**Expert:** This case presents a captivating legal intersection. While freedom of speech is a fundamental right, it is not absolute.Words can indeed inflict harm,and under certain circumstances,online criticism can be construed as harassment or defamation,especially if it targets someone based on gender. In this case, Ms. Centeno’s claim hinges on whether Dr Arroyo’s language and tone crossed the line from legitimate critique into gender-based aggression.
**WTN: ** Journalist Shanik Berman has reported that Dr. Arroyo could be facing a hefty 60 million Peso fine.What are the potential legal ramifications Dr. Arroyo might face if found liable?
**Expert:** The potential consequences are indeed meaningful. Besides the hefty financial penalty,a finding of liability could damage Dr. Arroyo’s reputation and professional standing. Furthermore, depending on the specific charges and judgment, it could possibly lead to restrictions on his online activity.
**WTN:** Many online users have expressed support for Dr.Arroyo, arguing that he is being unfairly targeted. What role do social media platforms play in shaping public opinion and potentially influencing legal proceedings?
**Expert:** Social media platforms have become powerful forums for both discourse and mobilization. They can shape public perception and influence legal outcomes by amplifying certain narratives and using public sentiment as leverage. While online solidarity can be powerful, it is indeed crucial to remember that online platforms are not bound by the same standards of evidence and due process as a court of law.
**WTN:** this case highlights the complexities of navigating free speech, online accountability, and the legal definition of gender-based violence in the digital age. What are some key takeaways for individuals engaging in online discourse?
**Expert:** this case serves as a stark reminder that words have power, and even seemingly harmless online comments can have significant consequences. It emphasizes the need for responsible and respectful online engagement,recognizing the potential impact on others. It also underscores the importance of understanding the evolving legal landscape surrounding free speech and online accountability.
**WTN:** Thank you for your valuable insights, [Expert Name]. This case will undoubtedly continue to be closely watched as it unfolds.
