SG confirms impeachment grievance towards Decide De la Peza

Mexico Metropolis. This Tuesday at 13:00, a consultant of the Ministry of the Inside (SG) went to the Chamber of Deputies to ratify the impeachment grievance that stated physique filed yesterday towards Decide Rodrigo de la Peza, whom it accuses of “violating the Structure.”

Sources from San Lázaro who requested to not be named indicated that the SG officers “got here to ratify the impeachment grievance in a well timed method, which will likely be forwarded immediately to the Preliminary Examination Subcommittee for its analysis. It’s as much as them to find out the admissibility and whether or not or to not convene the Joint Committees” of Authorities, Constitutional Affairs and Justice.

In line with the doc that was delivered immediately – which this newspaper was capable of see – the grievance towards De la Peza, Ninth District Decide for Administrative Issues in Mexico Metropolis, is signed by Omar Guadalupe Gutiérrez Lozano, head of the Normal Unit of Authorized Affairs of the SG.

As reported in The DayDe la Peza was accused by the SG of violating the Magna Carta after the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Department of the Federation (TEPJF) said that it could not adjust to the orders of stated decide.

De la Peza López had given the presiding decide of the TEPJF, Mónica Soto, a 24-hour deadline to suggest the 2 electoral judges in order that they’ll fill the vacant positions within the Superior Courtroom.

In a press release issued yesterday by the TEPJF, the physique rejected the jurisdiction of the Ninth District Courtroom to impose precautionary measures within the aforementioned case, contemplating that “the composition of the plenary session of this jurisdictional physique is an electoral matter.”

The measures introduced by De la Peza “are unjustified and extreme,” stated the TEPJF, which “categorically rejected the unfounded actions of the aforementioned District Decide in making an attempt to impose, above the Political Structure, the natural regulation and the laws themselves, the determinations that, for the right functioning of this physique, are the unique duty of the Superior Courtroom.”