iLaw thesis VS Somchai Songkhram
Senator Somchai Sawangkarn confirmed that the act of copying information to write a doctoral thesis, as published. It is not true, explaining that he researched this thesis himself in terms of getting a grandfather.
prove that this thesis There were interviews with people involved, including former MPs who drafted the 1997, 2007, and 2017 constitution, former MPs and senators who agreed and disagreed , Focus Group interviews with academics and the public. Including designing questionnaires for hundreds of people. 2017 Constitution to be analyzed together with past versions and foreign articles.
But that was a small mistake that was corrected. footnotes and bibliographies are omissions. A citation derived from a literature review related to a researcher at an institution
The sections mentioned are not related to the research. But it is in the literature review section (Literature Review), which is a general research principles Introduction and review of domestic and international research literature is considered good and therefore recommended for reference.
“I admit that I missed an opportunity to write. The amendment was asked for approval. You can check it out on the Thammasat Library website. Permission to edit is requested. and the amendment was accepted.”
Senator Somchai plans to sue iLaw
Mr. Somchai confirmed that it is a normal principle that needs to be reviewed. By academics and researchers, if you read this thesis you know it is not a copy. Or cut and paste research as iLaw has been accused, because literature review is the process of applying research and citing footnotes and bibliographies. This book contains references throughout. But two books are written by the same person, which causes omission. But it was approved for correction.
Therefore, iLaw’s presentation is considered to be false or misleading information that causes damage. We are currently gathering evidence to consider whether or not to press charges.
Bringing the writings of iLaw together
It is like taking a message from a newspaper. or SW.’s academic library, which has references. Because it was considered beneficial, it was imported. It is definitely not a copycat thesis. The person who can confirm this is the person interviewed in the research. Participants attended two Focus Group conferences and the research remains to be read.
Information about the Senate election or if there is a hidden political record will appear.
Choosing to reveal information at this time, Mr. Somchai does not know, but it may be because the choice was close. So people searched and found it. Or maybe there is a hidden political agenda. Since it came out to specify the voting process in the election of senators, there were some political groups that moved to send people to elected senators, against the spirit of the constitution, which was for the people appoint who wanted to be senators, and the Electoral Commission has not done its work yet.
2024-04-20 09:00:00
#iLaw #opens #General #Somchai #Sawangkarn #doctoral #dissertation #competition
