– But that’s a lie. It is quite special that the youth party of Norway’s largest parliamentary party sits down and cooks this together.
The leader of Unge Høyre, Ola Svenneby, exclaims when Dagbladet asks him about the allegations in AUF’s debate booklet, which is distributed to all the party’s youth politicians who are currently participating in school debates.
Svenneby reacts to the speeches AUF has formulated about drug reform. Here it says:
“For eight years, the Conservative government has been in power. They have not done anything for those who need it most. The drug addicts need help, not punishment. We in the Labor Party are ready for that »
AUF confirms that the content is correct.
– They can say that AUF is against punishment for those who intoxicate themselves, but they can not say that the Labor Party is against it. After all, they have adopted something else in their program.
Completely behind target. What in the world? ????
— Lυɾιϝαƙʂ (@krakylisk) August 26, 2021
–
Went towards the drug reform
In what became one of this spring’s major political thrillers, the Labor Party went against the government’s drug reform.
They will now study a system in which they distinguish between the heaviest drug addicts and others who use drugs illegally, with the possibility of punishing the latter group.
Norwegian school debates are known for high temperatures and razor-sharp pointed formulations. The Young Conservative leader acknowledges that they have their own form.
– The ceiling height in the school debates is high. You can be creative in the formulations. But here they willingly mislead young people away in material that has been approved and sent out from central. I think they should stay too good at that, says Svenneby.
view more
–
Responds to the form of debate
He has gained access to the entire AUF’s debate booklet, which is a tool for young politicians who are to participate in school debates for the first time.
Svenneby believes that AUF is dishonest in its school debates, and consistently goes too far compared to the other parties.
– It’s easy to be a little tough in the mouth in school debates. We also make mistakes, but if something is factually wrong or we go too far, we lie flat.
– It is not about us not wanting the debate. Just attack us, Svenneby emphasizes.
