Home » News » Saved Two Derby, Lost Billions in Europe: A Costly Trade-Off

Saved Two Derby, Lost Billions in Europe: A Costly Trade-Off

Bulgarian Parliament’s Controversial Decision: Deribes Coalition Saves Immunity of Accused MPs

In a move that has sparked ⁣widespread outrage, the Deribes of Dogan coalition, in alliance with GERB, secured⁢ the votes of the Boris ‍Party to protect Jayhan Ibryamov and Mario Rangelov from facing justice.​ Ibryamov is accused of bribery and trading in influence, while Rangelov faces allegations of buying votes. This decision has been labeled⁣ a “shameful act” by critics, further eroding public trust in bulgaria’s political institutions.⁣

The vote against lifting the immunity of these MPs has far-reaching consequences. ​ Yordan Tsonev, Deputy Chairman of MRF-New Home, highlighted during the debate that this decision is directly linked to a financial hole in the budget.He emphasized that the Justice mechanism, a key⁣ requirement for ⁢Bulgaria’s Recovery and Sustainability Plan funding, is now at risk. “The impediment of justice on the high floors of power is a sufficient reason to stop both the money on the fabric and the euro money we currently need,” Tsonev warned.

The ⁤controversy deepened as Stanislav Anastasov, Deputy Chairman of DPS, criticized the absence of Kiril Petkov during the debate. “I‌ expected‍ him to defend the erodes, but he ‌left the hall ⁢right now,” Anastasov stated. He further claimed that the ‌ Deribetic rule is set to become “the most​ expensive government in our history,” even before any thefts have occurred. ‍

Bayram Bayram, Deputy Chairman of MRF-Yet, condemned ⁣the coalition’s tactics, accusing them of exploiting ethnic tensions and manipulating public sentiment. “They played on the ethnic⁢ string, lying about changing names, which ​created a huge ⁢ethnic tension and threatened national security,” Bayram said. He also criticized the coalition’s MPs for aligning with Boyko Rashkov, despite previous conflicts, to protect⁣ the immunity of a ‌few individuals.

The parliamentary session took⁤ a dramatic‍ turn when Hamid Hamid proposed ‍a clear and by-name vote,a suggestion that was swiftly rejected by the MPs. Hamid urged his colleagues to “protect the name of the Bulgarian⁢ Parliament,” but the final decision ​mirrored the earlier vote on Ibryamov’s immunity.

This decision⁢ has raised​ serious questions about the integrity of Bulgaria’s political system. Critics argue that the​ Deribes coalition ‍has⁣ prioritized protecting its own over upholding ⁣justice, setting⁢ a dangerous precedent for the country’s ⁣democracy.‌

| Key Points | Details |
|—————-|————-|
| Accused MPs | Jayhan ibryamov (bribery, trading in influence), Mario Rangelov (vote buying) |
| Coalition | Deribes of Dogan, GERB, Boris Party |
| Impact | Financial hole in the budget, risk to Recovery and Sustainability‌ Plan funding |
| Criticism | “Shameful act,” exploitation of ethnic tensions, erosion of parliamentary authority |

for more updates on this developing story, ⁣visit StandartNews.com.
“`html

Bulgarian‍ Parliament’s Immunity Controversy: Expert Insights⁣ on the Deribes Coalition’s Decision

In a highly controversial move, the deribes ​of Dogan coalition, alongside GERB and the Boris Party, recently voted to protect MPs⁤ Jayhan Ibryamov and Mario Rangelov ⁣ from losing their​ parliamentary immunity. Ibryamov⁣ faces allegations of bribery and trading⁢ in influence, while‌ rangelov is accused of vote buying. This decision has sparked‌ widespread criticism, ⁣with many labeling it a‌ “shameful ⁣act” that threatens Bulgaria’s justice system and‌ financial stability. To⁤ delve deeper ​into this⁢ issue, we sat down with⁢ Dr. Elena vasileva,a ​renowned political analyst‍ and expert on‌ Balkan politics.

The Immediate ⁢Fallout of ‍the Decision

Editor: Dr. Vasileva, the Bulgarian Parliament’

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.