In Colombia, violence in soccer is not an issue that is taken lightly. The specialist Fernando Segura pointed out that the three-year veto that the Medellín authorities intend to impose on the Mexican Efraín Juárez, coach of Atlético Nacional and who faces an investigation for provoking rival fans in a duel against Deportivo Independiente (DIM), seems exaggerated, but in reality it reflects concern about the hostile environment on the fields of the coffee-growing country.
“In the Medellín classic a year ago there were two deaths, since then the matches between Atlético and Deportivo have been played without visiting fans.
With this context there is already a hostile atmosphere, and now Efraín says that he only celebrated the victory, but doing it that way was not a euphoric celebration, but rather a provocation.
“said Segura, a sports sociologist and professor at the Tec de Monterrey in Querétaro.”
Juárez sparked controversy after celebrating ecstatically in front of the rival stands, Atlético Nacional’s victory against DIM in the semifinals of the Colombian Cup. The authorities detained the tricolor and even intend to impose a three-year sanction on him without being able to set foot in the stadiums of the South American country and a fine of 120 thousand Mexican pesos.
Colombians know very well what things are like regarding violence in football, they have had problems, they try to impose harsh sanctions on purpose.
said Segura, who has done field work in the coffee-growing country.
Due to the episodes of violence that have marked football and even the infiltration of paramilitary groups and drug trafficking, Colombian authorities, as well as non-governmental organizations, have made peace agreements to avoid attacks in sports.
However, from Segura’s perspective, Juárez’s attitude breaks with the peace agreements
because even though the coach affirms that he had no intention of attacking or provoking the fans, he cannot ignore the social context of the so-called Medellín classic. What Efraín did doesn’t help at all. I had to know that the situation was tense
held.
The authorities are fearful and any detail breaks the balance. In Colombia there is a specialized unit with high-definition cameras with which they analyzed Juárez’s gestures and attitude. As a coach, he must lead by example and be aware of the context
said.
The sanction has generated various reactions and even the mayor of Medellín, Federico Gutiérrez, considered it absurd, while Atlético Nacional supported Juárez.
However, Segura considered that the Colombian authorities will not be lenient in this situation; and while they are likely to reduce the sentence, they will seek a severe punishment.
Many think that they are attacking Atlético or Efraín as a Mexican, but that is when contexts come into play. In the end, these types of episodes, no matter how unpleasant they may be, serve to accommodate things and often serve as an example.
For now, the Dimayor League punished Juárez with two suspension dates and a fine of 2 million 600 thousand Colombian pesos (12 thousand Mexican pesos) for making provocative gestures in front of the rival fans in the semifinal of the Colombian Cup after winning against the DIM.
In addition, he was fined 866 thousand Colombian pesos (4 thousand 33 Mexican pesos) and suspended two games for use offensive language and provoke the opponent by celebrating a goal
in the match against Santa Fe corresponding to the first home run date of the Dimayor League semifinals. However, Atlético Nacional filed an appeal.
Both sanctions are only sports sanctions, so the resolution by the Medellín police is still awaited.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘133913093805922’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Contact’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Donate’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘FindLocation’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Lead’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Search’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Subscribe’, {value: ‘0.00’, currency: ‘MXN’, predicted_ltv: ‘0.00’});
fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);
#Sanction #Juárez #reflects #Colombias #concern #violence #soccer
–
**Understanding the socio-cultural context is crucial when analyzing this incident. How do the historical factors of violence and the specific cultural dynamics of Colombian football fandom contribute to the severity of the situation?**
## Interview: Efraín Juárez Sanction – A Reflection of Violence in Colombian Football?
**Welcome to World Today News, where we delve into current events shaping our global landscape. Today, we’ll be discussing the recent controversy surrounding Efraín Juárez, coach of Atlético Nacional, and the three-year ban imposed on him by Medellín authorities for provoking rival fans.**
**Joining us are two esteemed guests:**
* **Dr. Fernando Segura:** A sports sociologist and professor at the Tec de Monterrey in Querétaro, with extensive field experience in Colombian football.
* **Maria Garcia:** A Colombian football journalist and commentator with deep understanding of the cultural and social dynamics surrounding the sport.
**Let’s begin with the core issue: Dr. Segura, the article mentions that Efraín Juárez’s celebration was deemed provocative and sparked outrage amongst authorities. Do you agree with their assessment, given the context you’ve studied?**
**Dr. Segura:**
**(Expands on his perspective, discussing the “hostile atmosphere” and the history of violence in Colombian football, potentially drawing comparisons with similar situations globally. He might mention the cultural significance of fandom and the pressure felt by coaches in highly charged environments.)**
**Maria, what’s your take on the incident? Are such celebrations simply passionate displays from a winning coach, or do they possess deeper implications in the specific context of Colombian football?**
**Maria Garcia:**
**(Shares her perspective on the cultural nuances of Colombian football. She might discuss the history of violence, the role of paramilitary groups, and the efforts made to curb this problem. She could also address the public’s perception of the incident and the reactions from Atlético Nacional fans and opponents.)**
**Moving forward, let’s discuss the severity of the three-year ban. Dr. Segura, the article mentions that this might be an attempt to send a strong message against violence. Do you think this is an appropriate response, or is it disproportionate considering Juárez’s actions?**
**Dr. Segura:**
**(Delves into the complexities of applying sanctions in a context marked by violence. He might discuss the role of deterrence, the potential for escalation, and the need to balance punishment with rehabilitation.)**
**Maria, given your understanding of the Colombian legal system and football regulations, what are your predictions for Juárez’s future? Do you anticipate a reduction in the ban?**
**Maria Garcia:**
**(Provides insight into the legal process and the likelihood of appeals. She might discuss the Dimayor League’s involvement, the potential for negotiations, and the precedents set by similar cases in the past.)**
**Lastly, we turn to the broader implications. Could this incident be a catalyst for meaningful change in Colombian football culture? How can authorities and clubs work together to ensure a safer and more respectful environment for players and fans?**
**(Both guests offer closing remarks, highlighting the importance of dialog, education, and proactive measures to prevent future incidents.
They can emphasize the need for collaborative efforts across all stakeholders, including the government, football governing bodies, clubs, and fans, in tackling the deep-rooted issues surrounding violence in Colombian football.)
**Thank you both for sharing your valuable insights. This has been an enlightening discussion shed light on a complex and important issue.**
