Justice Party Rep. Ryu Ho-jeong is attending the plenary session held at the National Assembly on the 1st.[사진 출처 = 연합 뉴스]-On the 4th, Rep. Ryu Ho-jeong, who was surrounded by suspicion of’unfair dismissal of secretary’, announced on the 4th that “Tomorrow (5th), I will file a complaint with the party committee for the new mother who triggered the situation by posting false information on social media for the first time.
Rep. Ryu announced a statement at the National Assembly on this day and said, “The former secretary, who is a national member of the party, is a politician who is not a victim, as he himself revealed. “I will be willing to respond to the political battles for China. Mr. A must take responsibility for the political actions he chooses.”
Rep. Ryu said about the reason for dismissing Mr. A, “The attendant secretary A, who was mainly in charge of driving, wrote on SNS and chatted while driving. He fell asleep so often and felt the threat of safety enough to wake me up himself.” “I was late on schedule due to frequent lateness. I warned many times, but it was repeated,” he explained. In addition, “I saw 12 penalty bills for three months in a commercial vehicle, I was not on the 8th, and there was a personal business,” he said. “There was a violation of the exclusive bus lane, but I was told not to enter the exclusive bus lane. It is also true that he sang about the privileges. These actions were packaged as much as possible as a “difference in business orientation.”
Rep. Ryu cried and apologized to the party members, saying, “I’m not enough, I’m always so noisy. In addition to the confused party situation, I even caused concern.
On the other hand, Mr. A referred to himself as the complainant on his social network service (SNS) this morning and said, “No matter what the reason for the dismissal, despite the fact that there was a dismissal that had obvious procedural problems, no one refers to me as a victim. I didn’t do it.” Then, Mr. A wrote, “It will be decided through the current committee whether the reason for dismissal is reasonable, but should I not be protected against secondary damage until then?”
In another post, Mr. A said, “From some point on, the appearance of the parliamentary office was different from that of working equally and freely, and I talked to the chief executive officer several times about that part.” “After about a month, I “The work I was in charge of was starting to decline, and the working conditions were not kept.”
[김정은 매경닷컴 기자 [email protected]]
[ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
–
–
