In a significant escalation of the ongoing conflict, russia launched a record 267 drones into Ukraine overnight into Sunday. The massive aerial assault caused widespread destruction and claimed the lives of at least three people. This attack occurred just one day before the world marks the third year of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, intensifying concerns about the relentless war and its devastating impact on civilians and critical infrastructure. The timing of the attack, on the eve of the war’s anniversary, adds a symbolic layer to the conflict, underscoring its continued intensity and the absence of a clear resolution.

The aerial assault targeted multiple regions across Ukraine,severely testing the country’s air defenses and highlighting the immense challenges of protecting its territory from persistent Russian attacks. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy addressed the nation via social media, characterizing the assault as “the largest attack as Iranian drones began hitting Ukrainian cities and villages.” The sheer scale of the attack underscores the evolving nature of the conflict and the increasing reliance on drone warfare by both sides.

Ukraine’s air force reported that its forces successfully shot down 138 drones over 13 Ukrainian regions. Though, the sheer volume of drones launched meant that many still reached their intended targets, causing significant damage. The air force also noted that 119 additional drones were lost en route to their targets, suggesting potential malfunctions or other factors contributing to their failure. This highlights the complexities of drone warfare, where technological capabilities and countermeasures are constantly evolving.

Ukrainian firefighters respond to a fire after russian shelling in Kostiantynivka
Ukrainian firefighters extinguish a fire in a building destroyed after the Russian shelling of the city of Kostiantynivka, Ukraine on Feb. 23,2025. Diego Herrera carcedo/Anadolu via Getty Images

Along with the drone attacks, Russia also launched three ballistic missiles. One of thes missiles struck the city of Kryvyi Rih, resulting in at least one fatality, according to the head of the Kryvyi Rih military management. The use of ballistic missiles further demonstrates the diverse range of weaponry employed by Russia in its ongoing campaign against Ukraine,showcasing a willingness to utilize both conventional and asymmetric warfare tactics.

President Zelenskyy provided further context on the intensity of recent Russian attacks, stating that Russia has launched nearly 1,150 drones, more than 1,400 guided aerial bombs, and 35 missiles this week alone. This relentless barrage of attacks highlights the immense pressure faced by ukrainian forces and the civilian population, who are enduring constant threats to their safety and well-being.

Addressing the resilience of the Ukrainian people, Zelenskyy wrote on X, Every day, our people stand against aerial terror. This statement underscores the unwavering determination of Ukrainians to resist Russian aggression despite the ongoing challenges and dangers they face daily.

The escalation in attacks comes at a critical juncture, as leaders in Kyiv and across Europe grapple with the implications of rapid shifts in U.S. foreign policy under president Trump. These changes have introduced significant uncertainty into the international support for Ukraine, raising concerns about the future trajectory of the conflict and the potential for a shift in the balance of power.

President Trump’s engagement with Russian officials and his agreement to reopen diplomatic ties and economic cooperation with Moscow represent a significant departure from previous U.S. policy. This shift has fueled anxieties that the U.S. may seek a settlement to the war without adequately considering the interests of ukraine and its European allies, possibly leading to a resolution that compromises Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Previously, U.S. policy had sought to isolate Russia and its president, Vladimir putin, in response to the war. The potential for a rapprochement between the U.S. and Russia has thus raised concerns about the future of international support for Ukraine and the potential for a resolution that compromises its sovereignty and territorial integrity. This shift in U.S. foreign policy has created a sense of unease among Ukraine’s allies, who fear a weakening of the international coalition against Russian aggression.

Russia Ukraine War
A Ukrainian soldier passes by in partially occupied Toretsk, the site of heavy battles with the Russian troops in the Donetsk region, Ukraine, Saturday, Feb.22, 2025. Iryna Rybakova/Ukraine’s 93rd Mechanized brigade via AP

Zelenskyy has voiced concerns that a swift resolution pushed by Trump could result in Ukraine losing territory and becoming vulnerable to future Russian aggression. While U.S. officials have maintained that Ukraine would be involved in any peace talks,the uncertainty surrounding U.S. policy has added to the anxieties in Kyiv, creating a sense of vulnerability and raising questions about the long-term security of the nation.

Addressing the need for continued international support, Zelenskyy wrote on social media on Sunday, We must do everything possible to bring a lasting and just peace to Ukraine. This is achievable thru the unity of all partners—we need the strength of all of Europe, the strength of america, the strength of everyone who seeks lasting peace.

Though, President Trump’s recent statements have sparked alarm and anger in Ukraine. He suggested that Kyiv had initiated the war and accused Zelenskyy of acting as a dictator because the country has not held elections due to martial law. These statements have further strained relations between the U.S. and Ukraine, adding to the uncertainty surrounding the future of their partnership.

Adding to the diplomatic complexities, Russia’s deputy foreign minister stated on Saturday that preparations were underway for a Trump-Putin meeting. This progress suggests that Russia’s international isolation may be thawing, at least within the context of the Trump administration. The potential for a Trump-Putin summit raises questions about the future of U.S.-Russia relations and the implications for the conflict in Ukraine, potentially leading to a shift in the geopolitical landscape.

the White House has not yet responded to requests for comment regarding the proposed meeting, leaving the situation shrouded in uncertainty. The potential for a Trump-Putin summit raises questions about the future of U.S.-Russia relations and the implications for the conflict in Ukraine.

UKRAINE-RUSSIA-CONFLICT-WAR-ANNIVERSARY
Pedestrians walk on the street in downtown Kyiv, on February 23, 2025, ahead of the third anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. ROMAN PILIPEY/AFP via Getty Images

Zelenskyy and other officials are scheduled to attend a forum in Kyiv on Sunday to discuss the country’s state, one day before the war’s three-year mark. Zelenskyy is expected to conclude the forum with a news conference, providing further insights into the challenges and priorities facing Ukraine.

Meanwhile, in a special televised message on sunday, Putin praised Russian soldiers fighting in Ukraine for defending their native land, the national interests and the future of russia. This message coincided with Russia’s Defender of the Fatherland Day, which falls a day before the anniversary of the invasion.

Putin used the holiday greeting to pledge greater social support for military personnel and new weapons and equipment for russian forces. He emphasized the importance of strengthening Russia’s armed forces in the face of a changing world.

Today, as the world is changing impetuously, our strategic course for strengthening and developing the Armed Forces remains unchanged, he said, adding that Russia would continue to develop its armed forces as the essential part of Russia’s security that guarantees its sovereign present and future.