The Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, said that the actual transfer of nuclear weapons to Ukraine would be tantamount to an act of aggression against Russia. He specified this in a post on his Telegram channel, referring to the country’s updated nuclear doctrine, as reported by Focus.
“The real threat of providing nuclear weapons to the Kiev regime is seen as preparation for a nuclear conflict with Russia. “ noted Medvedev.
He said that the delivery of such weapons would be considered an attack within the meaning of paragraph 19 of the Constitution of the State Policy on Nuclear Deterrence.
Talks about Ukraine’s nuclear weapons
On November 21, the American newspaper The New York Times reported that some representatives of the United States and European countries proposed the idea of returning nuclear weapons to Ukraine. This weapon was transferred to Russia after the collapse of the USSR according to the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.
However, as the publication notes, such a measure is difficult to implement and could lead to negative consequences, including an increase in tensions between Russia and the West .
Medvedev’s statement comes at a time of heightened rhetoric about nuclear security and international efforts to contain the conflict in Ukraine. The threat of possible nuclear weapons by Kiev shows the complexity of the situation and the possible global consequences of such a move.
Add the rating:
☆
☆
☆
☆
☆
2.9
Assessment 2.9 from 55 voice
2024-11-26 08:13:00
#Russia #warns #Providing #nuclear #weapons #Ukraine #considered #attack #ᐉ #News #Fakti.bg #World
**What specific legal arguments could Ukraine cite under international law to justify acquiring nuclear weapons, considering the Budapest Memorandum and other relevant treaties?**
## World Today News Exclusive Interview: Nuclear Risks and Ukraine
**Introduction:** Good evening and welcome to World Today News. Tonight, we are delving into the tense situation surrounding Ukraine and the potential transfer of nuclear weapons. Joining us are two distinguished guests: Dr. Anya Petrova, a renowned expert on nuclear security and international relations, and Mr. Mark Thompson, a former diplomat with extensive experience in Eastern Europe. Welcome to both of you.
**Section 1: Medvedev’s Warning and Russia’s Nuclear Doctrine**
* **Host:** Dr. Petrova, Dmitry Medvedev’s statement that providing nuclear weapons to Ukraine would be considered an act of aggression against Russia is certainly a strong warning. How does Russia’s updated nuclear doctrine factor into this stance?
* **Dr. Petrova:**
* **Host:** Mr. Thompson, from a diplomatic perspective, how do you interpret this warning? Is it solely a Russian deterrent, or does it signal a deeper concern about the potential instability such a move could create?
* **Mr. Thompson:**
**Section 2: The History of Ukraine’s Nuclear Arsenal**
* **Host:** Now, let’s delve into the historical context. Ukraine once possessed a significant nuclear arsenal inherited from the Soviet Union. Mr. Thompson, how did the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 play a role in shaping the current situation?
* **Mr. Thompson:**
* **Host:** Dr. Petrova, some argue that the events of 2014 and the annexation of Crimea by Russia undermined the trust established by the Budapest Memorandum. Do you agree with this assessment?
* **Dr. Petrova:**
**Section 3: The Potential Risks and Consequences of Nuclear Redeployment**
* **Host:** Let’s discuss the potential ramifications of Ukraine acquiring nuclear weapons. Dr. Petrova, what are some of the most significant risks associated with such a scenario?
* **Dr. Petrova:**
* **Host:** Mr. Thompson, from a diplomatic and political standpoint, how could the international community work to prevent this scenario from unfolding and de-escalate the current tensions?
* **Mr. Thompson:**
**Section 4: Looking Ahead: The Future of Nuclear Security in the Region**
* **Host:** Looking ahead, what are the long-term implications for nuclear security in Eastern Europe and the world? Dr. Petrova, what steps can be taken to ensure a more stable and secure future in the region?
* **Dr. Petrova:**
* **Host:** Mr. Thompson, based on your experience and observations, what message should be sent to Russia and Ukraine to encourage dialog and de-escalation?
* **Mr. Thompson:**
**Conclusion:**
* **Host:** We thank both Dr. Petrova and Mr. Thompson for their insightful contributions. This is a complex and challenging situation with far-reaching consequences. It is imperative that all parties exercise restraint and pursue diplomatic solutions to prevent further escalation and the potential for a catastrophic nuclear conflict. Thank you for joining us tonight on World Today News.
