At the beginning of September he wrote Dagbladet that the research ship, which belongs to the Shirshov Institute in Moscow, received permission to carry out a research cruise for the period from 26 August to 22 October. This is evidenced by the documents that Dagbladet had access to.
At the time, researcher Ina Holst-Pedersen Kvam of the Norwegian Defense Academy warned the Naval Academy of The potential of “academic Sergey Vavilov” to engage in both intelligence and sabotage.
The permit caused a stir – and the head of Storting’s Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Ine Marie Eriksen Søreide (H), asked Foreign Minister Anniken Huitfeldt (Ap) written question in the Storting on the justification of the authorization and on the safety assessments that have been carried out in advance.
According to the ship monitoring service, Marine Traffic, “Akademik Sergey Vavilov” is currently docked in the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad.
Søreide is clear that the government needs to re-evaluate the permit. Also following what is allegedly sabotage actions against the Nord-stream 1 and 2 pipelines. At the moment it is not known who is behind the accidents against the pipelines.
This is Nord Stream speculation
– It is worth asking whether the assessments are still valid, even after what happened in the Baltic Sea. I expect new assessments to be made following the developments in recent days, the former Minister of Defense and Foreign Affairs told Dagbladet.
– Part of the concern with this type of ship is that in the updated Russian military doctrines, the Russians are concerned with the use of civilian ships for military purposes. This is why I and others are reacting.
The right-wing leader urges the government to be vigilant.
– The Law of the Sea sets some clear restrictions on denying someone a research trip, but there’s still one more reason to be vigilant now, says Eriksen Søreide and adds:
– I don’t think my score has gotten worse in the last few days.
– Risk
As researcher Ina Holst-Pedersen Kvam, Eriksen Søreide points out that the ship has the potential to engage in intelligence and sabotage activities.
– That is the risk that the ship could have a completely different purpose, for example to inspect infrastructure on the sea floor or to transport and deploy sabotage equipment, the former minister says.
Eriksen Søreide points out that she also argued that the government should continuously evaluate the Norwegian exemption for Russian fishing vessels, which can enter Norwegian ports.
– When Russia is at war in Ukraine and is in conflict with much of Europe, the risk against Norwegian interests also increases. If so, you need to specifically justify why you say yes, rather than having permission as a starting point.
Dagbladet contacted the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday and asked whether the permit will be withdrawn or revalued. The Farnesina has not yet answered the question.
Then Dagbladet originally mentioned the permit stated, among other things, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs:
“Norway can refuse a search application in territorial waters. Outside the territorial waters, ie more than 12 nautical miles from the coast, the coastal state, on the other hand, can refuse the search in only a few cases.”
“For example, Norway can refuse if it is really not research, but fishing or exploitation of other resources. This comes from the law of the sea,” said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
“For this question, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs received input from other parts of the administration in the usual way. We have authorized the ship to conduct research outside Norwegian territorial waters, as required and in line with our obligations under the law of the sea “.
The ship has not received permission to call at Norwegian ports, according to documents to which Dagbladet originally had access.