/ world today news/ Rumen Ovcharov and Boyko Borisov were talking. This is not a political intrigue or rumor, but a confession by Ovcharov himself on BNT. Borisov consulted with him about the “Belene” NPP project and future changes in the “Kozloduy” NPP. This admission raises a few questions that host Polly Zlatareva will probably ask him another time in the future.
First question:
Why does Boyko Borisov need to call or meet with Rumen Ovcharov to ask him about these issues, after he has an energy minister in the government, head of the energy commission, MPs and experts? Doesn’t he appreciate them? Does it mean that the opinion of a former minister convicted of bankruptcy in the field of energy is more important than the current one, who is active and without a conviction?
Second question:
Does the presence of Ninova’s deputies in the parliament make sense, since Borisov does not wait for their opinion at all, after talking directly with … Ovcharov? Is that why the BSP did not have a position on Belene, and Ninova waited to answer parliamentary questions on the subject, as if she did not know that this national assembly was almost over?
Third question:
While Ninova swears by the BNR that she would not form a coalition with GERB and support a government of national salvation dominated by Borisov’s party, the gray-haired cardinal of her election staff chats with the prime minister and the leader of the ruling party. The question is reasonable, is Ovcharov the coalition broker of the BSP for the agreed partnership with Boyko Borisov’s party? I guess Ninova will still swear there is no such thing. They say that on a second oath people take faith.
Fourth question:
With each of her media appearances, Cornelia Ninova claims that the internal opposition was in collaboration with the ruling party. They wanted a coalition, but she didn’t, well no. This was her main motive for the demonization of the big names in the BSP and for the purge from the governing bodies of the left. At the same time, Rumen Ovcharov, who is a member of the National Council, spoke with Borisov. So, Ninova, who is in cahoots with GERB, your internal opposition, or you through Ovcharov?
Fifth question:
Does Ninova share Rumen Ovcharov’s accusation that the American ambassador had an impact on Borisov’s decision to give up Belene? And since he is a member of the National Council of the BSP, is this an official position of the left? With what evidence does the BSP attribute such an action to Mrs. Hero Mustafa?
Sixth question:
While watching the TV show in question, I wondered what motive Ninova would use to justify her already agreed coalition with Borissov, and I remembered that the BSP has not yet presented its pre-election program. So far, such a document has been voted on at least three months before each vote. I hope Cornelia doesn’t wait for the GERB program to rewrite it. I don’t rule it out, for two reasons. The first is that with two identical pre-election programs, one common management program is obtained. The second is that Ninova really, really likes to take credit for other people’s merits and work. He recently attributed to himself the structures in the BSP that were established during the time of Parvanov and under Stanishev. So she first closed them, and then opened them with new names. At the end of last year, Maya Manolova and the Poisonous Trio invited all parliamentary and non-parliamentary parties to discuss common actions to hold fair elections. A few days ago, President Radev’s meetings with the political forces on the same topic ended. Kornelia Ninova decided two days later to do the same, but only with the non-parliamentary parties, because she probably knows that none of the parliamentary ones will go to her meetings. I won’t say why.
Well, Bulgarians often joke about the Macedonians, who claim to be the origin of the world. Well, Nineveh hit them in the ground!
Seventh question:
Ninova, when are you going to broadcast Ovcharov again? It is very good!
#Rumen #Ovcharov #admitted #Borisov #consulted #Belene #NPP #Kozloduy #NPP
