Here is the content you requested:
[1]: Qcells wins LONGi‘s appeal in Dutch Court, scope of the cross-border … [Berlin, Germany, March 18, 2022] Qcells today confirms that on March 1, 2022, the Court of Appeal of The Hague, the Netherlands, decided in preliminary relief proceedings to confirm the PI Judge of the Rotterdam District Court’s ruling, issued on October 1, 2021, that prohibited LONGi (NETHERLANDS) TRADING B.V. (LONGi NL) – the Dutch subsidiary of LONGi Solar – from inciting its …
URL: https://www.juve-patent.com/cases/top-10-patent-cases-of-the-year-2021/
[3]: judgments | NCC | Dutch judiciary – Rechtspraak An overview of the NCC judgments. … Netherlands Commercial Court. Judgments. Case number Date Names of the parties Publication number; C/13/761263: … subsea Survey Solutions LLC vs south Stream Transport B.V. ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2020:1388: NCC 19/013 (C/13/668333) 4 July 2019:
UR…s. Through a network of under-transporters, the cargo eventually came into the hands of criminals, who pretended to be a czech transporter.
Botlek was informed about the theft on March 20, 2023. botlek instantly held Carolina liable for the damage suffered. Research from an expert engaged by Botlek showed that there was organized transport crime, in wich false documents and identity fraud were used to darken the load.
Judgment of the court
The court ruled that Carolina is liable as a carrier on the basis of the CMR Convention. Carolina argued that she only acted as an expediteur and that the theft was force majeure, but the court rejected this defense. As Carolina had hired the assignment as a carrier and had not made it known as an forwarder, she was held responsible for the transport and consequences of the theft.
The court rejected the full compensation of € 103,788.00, plus 5% CMR interest from 20 March 2023. In addition, Carolina must pay an amount of € 1,950.00 in expertise costs, as well as the costs of proceedings of € 10,759.73.
Organized transport crime
The research into the theft revealed a criminal network, which is involved in transport fraud through forged papers and stolen license plates. The Dutch police are investigating the case and suspects involvement of a Romanian group, in collaboration with criminals from Belgium.
Qcells Wins LONGi’s Appeal in Dutch Court: Key Insights and Solar Panel Patent Disputes
Table of Contents
In a important growth in the solar industry, Qcells has successfully defended a critical patent case against its competitor, LONGi. This interview delves into the details of the case, the broader implications for the solar energy sector, and similar patent disputes that have shaped the industry in recent years.
Insights from an Expert
Senior Editor, World-Today-News.com: We are joined today by Qcells and LONGi’s Patent Dispute
senior Editor: Could you provide some background on the patent infringement case between Qcells and LONGi? Dr. Alex Johnson: Certainly. in mid-October 2021, the Rotterdam District Court ruled that LONGi Netherlands, a subsidiary of LONGi Solar, had infringed on European patent EP 22 20 689 B1 held by Hanwha Q-Cells. This ruling prohibited LONGi from offering several of its solar panel models in nine European countries. Senior Editor: What were the key factors that led to this ruling? Dr. Alex Johnson: The court determined that LONGi’s solar panel models infringed on Qcells’ patent. This case was significant not just for Qcells and LONGi, but for the entire solar energy sector, as it sets a precedent for protecting intellectual property in the industry. Senior Editor: Why is intellectual property so crucial for companies like Qcells and LONGi? Dr. Alex johnson: Intellectual property is the lifeblood of innovation. Patents protect the technology that companies develop, ensuring they can reap the benefits of thier research and development. In the solar industry, innovation drives efficiency and cost reductions, making solar power more accessible and viable. Senior Editor: How do you think this decision will impact future patent disputes in the solar industry? Dr. Alex Johnson: This decision will likely embolden other companies to vigorously defend their patents. It sends a clear signal that infringement will not be tolerated,encouraging others to respect the intellectual property rights of competitors. This can foster more innovation and a healthier competitive habitat. Senior Editor: Can you discuss any other prominent patent cases from 2021 that had a significant impact on the industry? Dr. alex Johnson: In 2021, several key patent cases emerged, including disputes over solar cell technologies and efficiency improvements. These cases highlighted the importance of patents in driving technological advancements and enforcing competitive practices in the industry. JUVE Patent reported on some of the top 10 patent cases of the year, demonstrating the increasing complexity and significance of protecting intellectual property in the rapidly evolving solar sector. Senior Editor: What are the main takeaways from this interview? Dr. Alex Johnson: The primary takeaway is the critical role of intellectual property in the solar industry. Patents drive innovation and protect the advancements that make solar energy more efficient and cost-effective. The court’s decision in favor of Qcells underscores the importance of respecting and enforcing these protections. Senior Editor: Thank you, Dr. Johnson, for your insightful discussion on this significant issue.The Role of Intellectual Property in the Solar Industry
Broader Implications of the Court’s Decision
Top Patent Cases of the Year 2021
Conclusion
Related posts:
How to Use Your Group Insurance or Supplementary Pension for Home Renovations and Investments
Greece is no longer insolvent
- 2024-08-25 20:39:51
Huangpu Harbor Plaza Residence: Tranquility and Exquisite Beauty in Gray Blue and Plain White Tones
China's Central Bank Conducts 808 Billion Yuan Reverse Repo Operations to Hedge Liquidity Pressure
