/ world today news/ Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Moscow. The negotiations will last three days, but the main thing about them is already known today. We bring all the hidden meanings to the surface in this Tsargrad article.
The key words of leaders
Many times we have heard and read that the visit of such and such a foreign leader to Moscow or the visit of the President of Russia somewhere is of historical importance. But we have never been present at the beginning of negotiations that actually change world history.
This is happening today: the presidents of Russia and China are meeting in Moscow. Their meeting and negotiations between the members of the governments of the two countries will last for three days – and during that time the world will be watching with bated breath.
Because these meetings and negotiations really mean the end of the old world and the beginning of the new world. The end of Western dominance and the creation of a multipolar world in which the West opposes a union of many independent and self-contained civilizations.
There are no trifles in the preparation of meetings of this level. For example, on the eve of the visit, two leaders each published an article in both countries about cooperation between Russia and China. And here is an interesting content analysis of the content of these articles: the most mentioned words in the articles of Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping:
-
Putin: Russia – 21, China – 22.
-
Si: Russia – 25, China – 30.
Mentions of Ukraine:
Mention of the word “peace” (in different contexts):
„Ratification of the Russian victory’
Does this mean that the topic of the confrontation between Russia and the West in Ukraine will become one of the central topics of the negotiations? Of course, yes. Thus, the press secretary of the President of Russia, Dmitry Peskov, agrees:
At the talks with Xi Jinping, Putin will give comprehensive explanations about the current situation in Ukraine, so that the President of the People’s Republic of China will get an immediate idea of the situation from the Russian side.
And the representatives of the West are very afraid of the Chinese peace initiatives – because it is obvious that these initiatives mean recognition not of “strategic defeat”, but on the contrary, for a strategic victory of Russia. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby “expressed the Biden administration’s skepticism about China’s intentions. He said calling for a ceasefire would be unacceptable because it would only ratify Russia’s gains so far.”
However, strange as it may sound, talks about Ukraine are the least significant part of President Xi’s visit to Moscow. Both enemies and friends of Russia understand that it is about a global change of the entire world order. More precisely, how to overcome the mess created by the US.
The same John Kirby in the publication Politico said about the attempts of Russia and China “to disrupt the rules-based international order”established after World War II. Kirby noted the growing cooperation between the two superpowers. It was repeated by the authoritative Bloomberg – here they write about “rock solid support” for Russia from President Xi and China.
The US is losing allies
This growing collaboration is hard to miss—and hard to miss what it means: instead of “isolate Russia” from all over the world, it turns out that actually it “isolates the West” from the world where Russia and China cooperate. The great regional powers join them.
American experts note with horror that after the meeting in Moscow, Iran’s chances of joining the Shanghai Cooperation Organization will increase. But if it was only that.
Iran and Saudi Arabia, the world’s biggest oil exporter and until recently a US ally, have restored diplomatic relations. Moreover, on the very day of President Xi’s visit to Moscow, there was an official invitation from Saudi Arabia to the President of Iran to make an official visit to the kingdom.
The day before, Syrian President Bashar Assad arrived on a visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia – regardless of the fact that until recently, the Saudis, at the suggestion of the Americans, wanted his withdrawal / “Assad must go”/.
In two days, the United States has lost the lion’s share of its influence in the Middle East – and Russia and China are acting as a mediator between the countries here. They are the leaders of the new world, in which the USA with its hegemony has no place.
On the other hand, there is room for “forward-looking cooperation” – these, as we have seen, are the key words in President Vladimir Putin’s article on Russia-China relations.
What does this collaboration look like today? Here, for example, is news about hydrocarbon supplies. At the end of January 2023 Russia has come out on top in supplying natural gas to China, overtaking Turkmenistan and Qatar. We are talking about gas supplies both through the gas pipeline and in liquefied form.
In total, Russia supplied China with over 2.7 billion cubic meters of gas, of which 2 billion were delivered through the Power of Siberia, LNG accounted for about 0.77 billion. In comparison, Qatar and Turkmenistan supplied China with a total of 2.2 billion each, and Australia – 1.9 billion. In total for the year, China increased gas imports by 1% to 11.3 billion. cubic meters
So, the redistribution of the world means a redistribution of the export-import relations of the great powers. The Russian economy turned to the East – and the East needed it no less than the North.
And here is the political aspect of cooperation, presented by the scientific director of the Expert Institute for Social Research Gleb Kuznetsov:
Both sides declare the inadmissibility of any hegemony, the imposition of the opinion of a military-political bloc as the opinion of all humanity.
And the right to teach everyone else how to live
It is not necessary that all mankind should follow the US, says China through its leader:
The international community is aware that no country in the world is better than all others. There is no universal model of governance and no world order where the decisive word belongs to a single country.
This particular country, Russia and China believe, neither has the right to decide who is right, nor the right to determine who respects human rights here. The Chinese Foreign Ministry’s report on the state of democracy in the United States (yes, why not? Who decided that the standard of democracy could not be measured again?) arrived just in time for President Xi’s visit to Moscow:
„In flagrant violation of the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and the basic norms of international relations, the United States has unleashed wars and created separatist conflicts everywhere. In more than 240 years of U.S. history, the country has only been at war for 16 years, making it the most belligerent country in world history.
Since the end of World War II, the United States has fought or participated in many wars abroad, including the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Afghanistan War, and the Iraq War, resulting in extremely heavy civilian casualties and property damage, resulting in to huge humanitarian catastrophes.
Since 2001 US wars and military operations in the name of fighting terrorism have resulted in the deaths of more than 900,000 people, of which about 335,000 are civilians, millions of people have been injured, and tens of millions of people have been displaced.”
China and Russia deny the US and the West the right to tell the world how it should live properly. China and Russia believe that this right to decide how to live belongs to every independent state.
Whatever the name of the documents to be signed in Moscow, the essence of the agreements with China is precisely this.
What of this?
So we are witnessing the creation of a grand alliance between Russia and China aimed at defending the independence of both countries and against the hegemony of the United States and the united West.
The scale of what is happening is such that the specific documents that will be signed in Moscow do not matter. Because the very fact of the union is more important than any documents.
This has already been understood in the West, where they write with horror that “China is not interested in defeating Russia”. Translated into Russian: Russia’s victory is assured. This was understood by the political emigrants from Russia, who wrote that “now between Europe and Russia all contacts are cut off for 20 years”. Because the Russian economy is reorienting itself to the south and east. And Europe will get nothing from our resources.
This was also understood in the Middle East, where Saudi Arabia denied the US an allied relationship and restored the exchange of ambassadors with Iran at the suggestion of China.
This was understood in South America, where Brazil opened ports to the fleet of the same Iran.
An alliance of states independent of the West is being created, a new orchestra of powers in which Russia is the first violin and China works as a conductor. Or maybe the other way around.
And how else to interpret the words of the leader of China, already said in Moscow:
China is ready, together with Russia, to safeguard the world order based on international law… The development of relations between the Russian Federation and China is not only beneficial to their peoples, but also significantly contributes to the progress of the whole world.
Translation: EU
Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#Rockhard #support #President #Jinping #brought #surprise #world #Moscow
How does the article’s framing of the US as a “belligerent hegemon” neglect to mention instances of US cooperation and diplomacy in the international arena?
This article presents a heavily biased viewpoint on the shifting global order, framing Russia and China as heroes building a new, equitable world order while portraying the US as a belligerent hegemon.
Here are some open-ended questions broken down by themes to encourage discussion and critical thinking:
**1. The New World Order:**
* The article claims Russia and China are creating a world order based on “international law” and respect for independence. What are some examples of how these powers demonstrate this respect for international law and independent states?
* Do you think a bipolar world with the US and China as the dominant powers is ultimately advantageous or disadvantageous to smaller nations? Why?
* What role do you see for existing international institutions like the UN in this evolving world order?
**2. US Hegemony and its Critics:**
* The article portrays the US as a warmongering hegemon seeking to impose its values on the world. While acknowledging past US foreign policy mistakes, is this a fair and accurate representation of current US foreign policy goals?
* How does the US justify its military presence and interventions around the world? Do these justifications hold up to scrutiny?
* Can a powerful nation like the US truly exist without exerting some degree of global influence?
**3. Russia-China Alliance:**
* The article presents the Russia-China relationship as a balanced partnership. However, given the power asymmetry, is there a risk that China will ultimately dominate this partnership?
* Can Russia and China realistically build a global alliance based on shared values, or are their interests too divergent?
* What are the potential economic and geopolitical consequences of a closer Russia-China partnership for other countries?
**4. The Role of the West:**
* The article claims the West is losing its influence in the Middle East and elsewhere. To what extent is this true? What factors are contributing to this perceived shift?
* Should Western countries prioritize dialog and cooperation with Russia and China, or should they take a more confrontational stance?
* What can the West do to promote a more multipolar world order that reflects the interests of a wider range of countries?
**5. Alternative Narratives:**
* The article presents a specific narrative about the global order. What are some alternative perspectives on this topic?
* What sources of information can help us develop a more nuanced understanding of the complex geopolitical landscape?
Remember that these open-ended questions are designed to spark critical thinking and debate. Encourage participants to consider multiple perspectives, critically evaluate the information presented, and form their own informed opinions.