Below is reproduced in full a right of reply requested by the lawyer Ricardo Sasiain.
I am kind to contact you in exercising the right of rectification provided for by article 28 of the national constitution and article 1 of law no. 1262/87, in order to ask to make use of this right on the web portal “JUDICIALS.NET”, precisely in its editions of 11 and 12 October of the current year, with the same space and emphasis with which the note entitled ” The start of the trial of an alternate member of the JEM ”, citing my name and surname.
With regard to the aforementioned publication, I clarify that what was mentioned by the complainant and / or by Guillermo Duarte Cacavelos is an error, since the complainant herself, María Eugenia Acosta, accompanied by her lawyer, were the people who did everything necessary to avoid, by date, taking the oral exam from the month of May. In fact, it was our part that did not want to proceed with the conciliatory act and, consequently, I take the liberty of citing some facts that show that it is precisely the plaintiff who, finally, withdrew, citing the non-execution of the oral exam document:
A) Presentation of recusal against the conviction judge Manuel Aguirre, then rejected by the Court of Appeal, Fourth Section.
B) Request for suspension of the hearing for superimposition of another judgment.
In short, I am the most interested in resolving the serious allegations made by the complainant, María Eugenia Acosta, and without flirting with the legal terms, I affirm that the complaint presented is nothing more than a cry of desperation to try to divert attention from a transcendental procedure that is carried out (responsibility of the company BIOTÉCNIC SRL), which will demonstrate the truth about the complainant’s behavior towards the assets of a company whose children are shareholders. Attached is a notice of recusal and resolution of rejection.
To date, we have witnessed all the subpoenas ordered by the court, on the basis of the complaint presented, comparing them and demonstrating our proactive position to challenge them in any legal dispute, in order to demonstrate the non-existence of false and false accusations. . irresponsible actions that have been committed against me and my family. Among other things, in the notes of 11 and 12 October 2022, we read: “According to the complaint, the lawyer Sasiain treated Acosta for committing a breach of trust and fraud in his company, the lawyer claimant in the case declared, Guillermo Cacavelos to Judicial NET. “.
In another of the paragraphs in which the statements of the lawyer Duarte are established, it is highlighted: “Duarte recalled that the entrepreneur María Eugenia Acosta Vallejo (complainant) was the victim of irregular treatment in her company by the Council supplement of the judiciary Ricardo Sasiain and his wife, María Antonella Galli, his daughter ”(sic).
In this regard, such expressions are completely irresponsible because they give voice, at least in the first case, to statements that are currently under discussion before the judicial instances, in various types of proceedings, in civil and criminal jurisdictions; that is why we will be filing a new case against both María Eugenia Acosta Vallejo and her lawyer, Guillermo Duarte Cacavelos; reserving the right to promote other actions.
As for the alleged falsification of signatures that the publication defines as “very serious”, publishing the following: “The professional lawyer also recalled that his complaint against the prosecutor Fátima Capurro was recently upheld, for incorrect performance of duties. He would have requested a reduction of the terms in a very serious case of forgery of his signature involving his daughter and son-in-law, the lawyer Ricardo Sasiain ”; It is claimed that this is as bad as a random import of a parrigás, carpet and pesitas, not a commercial import as they try to lead us to believe.
In short, what is really serious in all this is Mrs María Eugenia Acosta Vallejo’s lack of interest in giving an account, before the Paraguayan justice, of her administration of the BIOTÉCNIC SRL company.
