Home » today » World » Rice-Animal Co-Culture Farming Could Generate $150 Billion Annually and Improve Environmental Health, Finds Study

Rice-Animal Co-Culture Farming Could Generate $150 Billion Annually and Improve Environmental Health, Finds Study

As the world collectively works towards a more sustainable future, agricultural practices are at the forefront of the conversation. However, as modern techniques and technologies are introduced, it is important to remember that there is value in traditional farming methods. One example of this can be found in the rice paddies of India, where a centuries-old technique is now being celebrated for its role in promoting sustainability. This article will explore the concept of “A Rice Idea” and how it is unlocking new sustainable solutions for agriculture.


A new study has found that rice-animal co-culture farming can help meet global food demands, improve environmental health, and generate an additional $150 billion in annual revenue for producers worldwide. Rice-animal co-culture farming is an ancient Southeast Asian practice of raising fish and other aquatic livestock in rice paddies. The practice combines rice farming with aquaculture, and it increases rice yields while reducing nitrogen runoff, leaching, and methane emissions compared to monoculture farming.

Rice is a staple food that sustains around half of the world’s population, and almost all of it is grown as a monoculture. Systems for growing rice and raising aquatic animals, such as fish, shrimp, and ducks have existed for over 1,000 years in Southeast Asia. However, this practice is now rare, with only 1% of global rice production coming from co-culture farms.

Previous studies have found that combining rice farming with aquaculture increases land-use efficiency while reducing the need for commercial fertilizers and pesticides, due to the animals’ nutrient-rich droppings, and aquatic species eating many problem insects and weeds. The new study assessed the performance of rice-animal co-culture systems throughout the world by looking at the combined research findings of 155 different case studies. The researchers found that rice-animal farms increase annual rice yields by 4% while reducing nitrogen runoff by 16% and leaching by 13% in relation to rice monocultures.

Co-culture systems produce more diverse food types and nutrient sources, contributing to food security. The study also found that rice-animal farms decrease methane emissions by 11% in relation to rice monocultures. Rice-duck and rice-crayfish co-culture systems altogether are estimated to reduce methane emissions by about 40%, while rice-fish co-culture systems are estimated to increase methane emissions by 29%.

Each system is unique in the ecological and economic benefits they provide, and the animal that should be chosen for a specific co-culture system depends on how well they can survive, grow, and reproduce in a given environment. If all suitable land were used for rice-animal co-culture farming, those farms would produce more than 140 million tons of animal protein per year, surpassing current global aquaculture production of just above 100 million tons per year.

Global adoption of rice-animal co-culture systems is estimated to provide an additional $152 billion to $171 billion in revenue to producers annually. However, the expected profits would vary by country and are dependent on the amount of land that is suitable for rice-animal co-culture. Countries projected to benefit the most from this farming approach are in Asia, where suitable land is more plentiful. Producers in China and India are estimated to earn an extra $34.8 billion to $52.8 billion more per year, while producers in Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Thailand can earn an extra $10.4 billion to $18.9 billion per year by switching to rice-animal co-culture.

Countries in other regions of the world that have the climate to sustain rice-animal farming, but currently have very few rice-animal farms established, also stand to benefit from the adoption of this practice. According to the study, countries like the United States and Brazil could earn an extra $1.4 to $2.4 billion per year by introducing rice-animal co-culture systems. Despite the potential benefits, the adoption of rice-animal co-culture has been slow to gain traction on a global scale because it requires co-culture-specific technologies, resources such as capital, labor, infrastructure, and market networks, and challenging national policies that promote rice monocultures.

Overall, rice-animal co-culture farming has the potential to address multiple challenges society is facing today, including the food crisis, climate change, environmental pollution, and resource scarcity. It is a sustainable and innovative strategy that could improve food security while helping to protect the environment.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.