Reports suggest that Apple may require MiFi certification for USB-C accessories to work with the iPhone 15, which an EU Parliament member calls a “direct violation of the law”.

As one of the most iconic smartphones on the market, Apple’s iPhone is always surrounded by attention and speculation from tech enthusiasts and consumers alike. Recently, the rumour mill has been churning out some interesting news regarding the upcoming iPhone 15 – specifically, its charging port. Reports suggest that the tech giant may be making a significant change to the physical design of the device by eliminating the classic Lightning port altogether. This shift has sparked a heated debate among iPhone fans and critics, leaving many to wonder if the potential move will be a welcome change or a major flop. In this article, we’ll explore the controversy surrounding Apple’s rumoured iPhone 15 charging port and what it could mean for the future of iPhone technology.


There have been numerous rumours circulating about the upcoming iPhone 15, ranging from specifications to its design. One of the most prevalent rumours suggests that Apple will finally replace the Lightning port with USB-C, but recent reports suggest that this move could cause more controversy than expected. Apparently, Apple plans to create a “walled garden” for USB-C by requiring MiFi certification for accessories to work with the iPhone 15. One EU Parliament member has called this action a “direct violation of the law.” Despite EU guidance recommending a common charger, Apple appears to be resisting the change and could be looking to charge a licensing fee for the most useful accessories. If the ‘walled garden’ approach violates EU guidance, it may not last for long. Check out the latest iPhone 15 rumours and the best deals for the iPhone 14 Pro.


In conclusion, the alleged swapping of the Lightning port for a new connector on the iPhone 15 has certainly caused quite the stir in the tech world. While some argue that it is a necessary move for the future of smartphone technology, others are skeptical about the potential impact on consumers, particularly with regards to compatibility and convenience. It remains to be seen whether Apple will indeed make this switch, but one thing is for sure – if they do, it will likely be met with both excitement and resistance from users around the globe. Regardless of the outcome, the debate highlights the importance of considering the implications of changes to widely-used technology before implementing them, and the balance between innovation and accessibility. Only time will tell whether this controversy is simply a storm in a teacup, or a sign of larger changes to come in the smartphone industry.