Home » today » Sport » Reactions to Petr Šilhavý’s future as national team coach: Former players share their thoughts

Reactions to Petr Šilhavý’s future as national team coach: Former players share their thoughts

Title: Czech Football Association to Discuss Coach’s Future Following Defeat‌ in Albania

Subtitle: National ‍team’s poor‌ performance prompts calls for change

Date:‍ [Insert Date]

The chairman ‌of the Czech Football Association, Petr Fousek, ​has called for an emergency meeting of the executive committee following the team’s humiliating defeat in ⁣Albania on Thursday (0:3). The twelve elected members ‌will decide whether coach Jaroslav Šilhavý will continue to lead the ​national team ‍in the⁣ remaining qualification ​matches.

In November, the team ⁣is scheduled to play in Poland on a national holiday and three days later in Olomouc against Moldova. However, no changes will be made for ‍the upcoming Sunday match against the Faroe Islands in ⁤Plzen.

If the executive committee agrees by majority ‍vote to dismiss Šilhavý, his ​successor will have only four days to work with the players before‍ the match in⁢ Warsaw.

Former national team ‍players were asked for their opinions on whether Šilhavý⁤ should step‌ down and who could potentially⁤ replace​ him.

Marek Jankulovski, a former‍ player, commented, “It’s easy to criticize from the outside. We⁤ must realize that we are an average national team. ‌We don’t have ten or fifteen additional players. I’ve seen comparisons between the current team and the one⁣ from 2004, but that’s completely off. Yes, we‍ have ⁢some players⁣ in foreign leagues, but some of⁤ them don’t play or play very ⁣little.”

He continued, “Everyone thinks we should beat Albania, but they have a team composed of ‍players ‍from the Italian league, which ‍is​ on the rise. ​And we‌ are playing with players from⁣ Sparta and Slavia, which, with all due respect to the Czech⁢ league,⁤ is a difference.”

Jankulovski also highlighted the difference in support, saying, “We⁢ can’t even fill a smaller stadium for national team matches, unlike​ in Tirana. The atmosphere there⁢ was full for every qualification match. I saw the match against Poland, and the fans ‌pushed them to victory. ​The same ⁣happened against us.”

When asked about a potential replacement for Šilhavý, Jankulovski suggested Jindra Trpišovský, but added, “I ​wouldn’t interfere right⁢ now.”

Milan Fukal, ⁣another former player, expressed his⁣ opinion, saying, “If Šilhavý received the ‍trust of the chairman and the executive ⁢committee, he should⁣ finish the⁣ qualification. I wouldn’t change the coach for the last two⁢ matches; that’s my opinion.”

He added, “The position of the national‍ team coach is specific.⁣ It should‌ be for a ⁤longer period, like the qualification. ‍What​ will a new ⁤coach change when the players gather a‍ few days ⁤before the match? And those⁣ players will be the same as those ‍in Albania.”

Fukal also questioned ‌the need for a‌ change in tactics, stating,​ “In the first half, we played ​with three defenders, and after the break, the formation was changed. So, are we going to come up with a third formation?”

Regarding‍ a potential replacement, Fukal ⁤said, “I don’t see a suitable candidate at the ‌moment. I think the⁤ idea of Trpišovský coaching both​ the national team and Slavia at the same time is not⁢ good.”

Václav Němeček, another former player, ​emphasized the importance of winning the upcoming match against the ⁣Faroe‌ Islands, stating, “If we can’t beat⁣ the Faroe Islands, even without a coach, then we might as well disband the team. Then it will be time⁤ for evaluation.”

He added, “I ​like Jaroslav Šilhavý, but I will repeat ‍once again⁣ – if the coach doesn’t succeed in the qualification, he should step down. Last year, we ⁢didn’t qualify for the World Cup.”

Němeček acknowledged the⁤ need for⁣ a ⁢suitable replacement, saying, “Firing the coach is ⁢one thing, but you also need to have a suitable successor. Honestly, I don’t know⁣ who should go there now. But if the⁣ association finds someone suitable, then⁣ why not?​ Something​ needs to be done.”

Former players⁤ expressed their criticism and opinions, but ⁢they all share⁤ the disappointment of every failure​ and the desire for the team to ​qualify for the European Championship.Title: Czech Football Association‍ to Hold Emergency Meeting Following Defeat in Albania

Subtitle: Decision on Coach ⁣Šilhavý’s Future to be ‍Discussed

Date: October 13, 2023

The chairman of‍ the Czech Football Association, Petr⁣ Fousek, has called for an extraordinary‍ meeting of the executive committee following ⁤the team’s ⁤recent defeat in ⁤Albania. The committee will decide whether coach Šilhavý will continue leading the national team in the remaining qualification matches.

The upcoming matches against Poland⁢ and Moldova, ​scheduled⁣ for ⁣November, will be crucial for the team’s qualification⁢ hopes. However, the ​decision on Šilhavý’s future will be made⁤ before these ⁢matches. The team will continue under his leadership for the upcoming match against the Faroe Islands in Plzen on Sunday.

If the executive committee⁤ decides ​to ‌dismiss Šilhavý, his successor will ‍have only four days to work with the⁤ players before the match against Poland in Warsaw. The search for a suitable replacement is already underway, with former national team players sharing their opinions on the matter.

Marek Jankulovski, a former Czech⁣ international,‍ emphasized the challenges faced by⁤ the national team. He highlighted the ​difference⁣ in resources and player quality compared to other ⁢nations. Jankulovski also mentioned the lack of support from Czech fans, pointing out the difference in attendance between ‌matches⁤ in Albania and the⁤ Czech Republic. He suggested ‍that a coaching change could bring a fresh impetus but did not ​propose‌ a specific replacement, except for mentioning Jindra⁢ Trpišovský as ‌a potential candidate.

Milan Fukal, another‌ former player, expressed his support for Šilhavý to continue until ⁢the end of the qualification campaign. He argued that changing the ‍coach for⁣ the last two matches would not bring significant⁤ improvements, as the players would remain‍ the same. Fukal also questioned the feasibility ⁢of introducing a new ⁢tactical system at this stage.

Václav Němeček, a former ‍Czech international, stressed⁢ the importance of winning the ‍upcoming match against the Faroe‍ Islands. He ‍stated ⁤that if the team fails ​to⁣ secure a ⁢victory, it would be time for a⁤ thorough evaluation. Němeček​ acknowledged the ‍need for a potential coaching change but admitted ⁣uncertainty regarding suitable candidates.

Karel ⁢Poborský, a legendary ​Czech player, urged for humility and perspective ​in evaluating the team’s ‍performance.‌ He pointed out the team’s ranking ​in the FIFA World Rankings and emphasized ​the unique challenges faced by national team⁤ coaches. Poborský highlighted the positive relationship between⁤ Šilhavý and the‌ players, suggesting that the coach’s influence goes beyond tactical decisions.

The decision ⁣on Šilhavý’s future will be crucial for the⁤ Czech national team’s qualification hopes. ⁢The emergency meeting of the executive committee will provide an opportunity ‍for thorough deliberation and the
detail‍ photograph

What ⁤are the potential consequences ⁤of making ⁣a coaching change at ⁢this stage, according to Milan Fukal, and how does it impact the team’s chances of ‌qualifying for the European Championship

K Jankulovski,​ a former ⁣player, acknowledged the challenges ​the national team faces and emphasized the need for realistic expectations. He pointed‌ out the difference in resources and opportunities between the Czech team and other countries. Jankulovski suggested that Jindra Trpišovský could be a potential replacement ‍for Šilhavý⁣ but advised against interfering in the decision-making process at the moment.

Milan⁣ Fukal, another ⁤former player, stated that if Šilhavý has the ⁣trust⁤ of the⁢ chairman and ‍the executive committee, he should be allowed to finish the qualification matches. Fukal expressed skepticism about making a coaching change at this stage and questioned the effectiveness of a new coach given the limited time to work with the players.

Václav‌ Němeček emphasized the importance of winning the upcoming match against the‍ Faroe Islands and expressed support⁢ for⁢ Šilhavý. However, Němeček also acknowledged the need for evaluation⁤ if the coach does not succeed ⁤in the qualification and highlighted the ⁤importance of finding a suitable replacement.

While former players have ⁢shared their criticism and ​opinions, ⁢they all share the disappointment of the team’s ⁣recent​ performance and the desire to see the team qualify for the ⁤European ​Championship. The decision on Šilhavý’s​ future will be made by the executive committee, and ‌it remains to be seen what course of action they will take.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.