Parolee’s Drug Use Leads to Reinstatement of Custody
A man convicted in 2013 on multiple rape charges adn sentenced to 17 years in prison, with a minimum of 10 years served, has been returned to custody. His release on parole last year was short-lived, due to subsequent violations of his parole conditions.
The individual,now in his 50s,received the harshest sentance ever handed down in the jurisdiction at the time for a similar assault case. His release on April 8th of last year came with strict conditions, including remaining drug-free. Though, this condition was violated less than two months later.
On May 17th,he was arrested and charged with another rape. While that charge was later dropped in May of this year, the investigation revealed a pattern of illegal drug activity. Authorities discovered he had purchased amphetamines and illegally obtained Ritalin multiple times following his parole. Further complicating matters, investigators found small amounts of illicit material on his personal computers and external hard drive.
As a result of these findings, prosecutors sought to have his parole revoked and the man returned to custody for violating his parole conditions.
During a court hearing earlier this month, the man admitted to illegally purchasing and using Ritalin. He also confessed to purchasing amphetamines, though he claimed not to have used them. This claim was contradicted by a blood test taken on the day of his arrest, which showed the presence of amphetamines in his system.
The court ultimately ruled that the man’s drug use constituted a clear breach of his parole conditions. Consequently, the court ordered his immediate return to custody.
This case highlights the serious consequences of violating parole conditions in the United States. Parole is a privilege, not a right, and any breach can result in a return to prison. The specifics of parole conditions vary by state and the nature of the original crime, but drug use is frequently a major violation.
based on the provided article, the man had his parole revoked due to violating his parole conditions by using drugs.
Parole is a privilege, not a right, and any breach can result [1] in severe consequences, including returning to prison to serve the remainder of the original sentence [1] . In this specific case, the parolee admitted to illegally purchasing and using Ritalin and purchasing amphetamines, though he claimed not to have used them. A blood test contradicted this claim, showing the presence of amphetamines in his system [1]. The court ultimately ruled that his drug use was a violation of his parole conditions, leading to his return to custody. [2].