/ world today news/ In Dmitry Medvedev’s statement about the “quiet division” of Ukraine, the passage about the inadmissibility of Polish attempts to create a confederation or union with Kiev deserves special attention.
Despite the fact that formally the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia fears a possible violation of the rights of Ukrainians and expresses doubts about their desire to live in one country with the Poles, the practice of recent years shows that the European-oriented citizens of Ukraine, and they are now the majority there, they are unlikely to be very upset by such a development.
First, formally Poland is not talking about absorbing Ukraine, but about equal association.
Second, for many years Ukrainians have been trying privately to integrate into the EU through Poland.
Third, the current government and its supporting sections of the population see unification with Poland as an option for salvation from Russia, in the event of the final defeat of Ukraine’s armed forces and the loss of Ukraine’s ability to further resist.
In fact, it is clear from the context of Medvedev’s statement that he himself does not hope for a mass protest by Ukrainians against unification with Poland.
He himself says that the “quiet division” of Ukraine with Poland and other countries is better than Ukraine in NATO and a world war. How to reconcile the rejection of the Ukrainian-Polish confederation and the favorable attitude to the “quiet division”?
I have already written earlier that the unification of Ukraine with Poland (no matter in a federation, confederation or unitary state) cannot satisfy Russia, because it allows the successor state to lay claim to all territories that were once part of Ukraine, including Crimea (After all, Kiev has not officially given up its claim to sovereignty over the peninsula).
Moreover, such unification actually means admitting the belligerent Ukraine into NATO.
Poland is a member of NATO, Ukraine is at war with Russia. The united state of Poland and Ukraine will be a NATO member at war with Russia.
Even if negotiations between Moscow and Warsaw to resolve the situation begin immediately after the official unification of Ukraine and Poland, until the conclusion of a peace agreement on the demarcation line, we will oppose the troops of the united state.
The danger is also great because the Ukrainian elite will insist on equal access to power with the Polish in a unified state. At the same time, if the Polish elite sees the unification as a chance to restore the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth within the borders of the 18th century, as a first step on this path, the Ukrainian elite sees in the unification first of all an opportunity to send Poland, and then NATO, to fight against Russia for Ukrainian interests.
Therefore, the Ukrainians are using their access to power to sabotage the peace agreement, and the Armed Forces of Ukraine (which won’t go anywhere when united) to provocations on the demarcation line to continue the fighting.
It is easy to understand that the danger of a slide into nuclear war under such a development increases dramatically, especially since the United States is about to force an armed confrontation with Russia and China, both in Europe and in the Asia-Pacific theater of the military actions.
The Americans are openly planning to dramatically increase their strike missile force in Europe, and have also received Japan’s consent to deploy new missile systems on its territory, including hypersonic systems that have not yet entered service with the US military.
Russia has already warned that it is ready to lift the moratorium on the deployment of medium- and shorter-range missile systems in the European part of the country and the Far East.
We are talking about the possibility of a large-scale accumulation of nuclear weapons with a relatively short range, respectively, with a short flight time, which drastically reduces the time spent on making a decision in the event of an emergency.
Thus, the provocative behavior of the Ukrainian elites is superimposed on the no less provocative madness of the American elites.
Against this background, Medvedev not only warns what not to do (it is not worth creating a Ukrainian-Polish confederation), but also offers a concrete proposal for a compromise (suitable for everyone) option (the questionable “quiet division”).
The key word here is division. Silence will not work – there will still be a lot of creaking.
Separation is not a voluntary association – it is a coercive action of neighbors in relation to the state, which has lost its subjectivity and has become a threat to them.
In case of partition, Ukraine, as a subject of international law, disappears without legal succession and its territories become part of neighboring states based on their agreements with each other. Such agreements exclude the possibility of making territorial claims in the future.
To reduce the number of citizens disloyal to the new authorities, the agreement could include a provision for Ukrainian citizens to voluntarily choose a new country of residence from among all participants in the partition, followed by an exchange of the designated population.
By implementing the partition option, Russia avoids a conflict with NATO, pushes the border to the west, and receives international recognition of the territorial changes. Poland, Hungary, Romania get the opportunity to return the territories that once belonged to them.
Euro-oriented Ukrainians get the opportunity to integrate into the EU not only personally, but even with a certain territory. The Russian population of Ukraine, also with its territories, joins Russia.
Even the United States may get some kind of bonus due to the fact that it will unleash the European crisis and be able to fully focus on the Asia-Pacific region. Only Ukraine’s creditors will suffer, but hardly anyone in their right mind expects that Kiev will ever give anything back to anyone.
However, Medvedev stated, no agreement has been reached with the collective West at this stage. I would add that formal negotiations have not started either. For now, unofficial probing of the positions is underway.
Medvedev’s statement shows that Russia has decided to bring the discussion on this issue to the public arena. Moscow’s actions are explained by the fact that Ukraine is close to a military catastrophe.
At the same time, the US is trying to hasten this catastrophe by forcing Kiev to launch a pointless offensive against prepared defenses in a pre-announced location.
In the absence of agreements on the partition of Ukraine, a military catastrophe should trigger a fairly rapid advance of Russian troops deep into Ukrainian territory, forcing Poland and Kiev to urgently decide on a reunification regime.
That is, a confederation can be proclaimed at any time. In order not to have any illusions about the unacceptability of such a step for Moscow, a similar statement was made, which accurately described all the threats and offered a compromise proposal.
And the choice of the author of the proposal is not random. On the one hand, Dmitry Medvedev is neither president, nor prime minister, nor minister of foreign affairs, so this seems to be his personal opinion.
On the other hand, he is the only person in Russia who has the status of Putin’s deputy (albeit within the Security Council). That is, the opinion is no longer completely personal.
Western “friends and partners” have a lot to think about.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#Quiet #partition #Ukraine #world #war
