Home » News » Putin will show them where the crabs spend the winter: England is preparing a nuclear attack on Russia – 2024-02-12 00:28:43

Putin will show them where the crabs spend the winter: England is preparing a nuclear attack on Russia – 2024-02-12 00:28:43

/ world today news/ Washington occasionally increases the degree of confrontation with Russia, without ever fearing that it is openly exposing its closest allies to attack. This time, the US intends to return its nukes to the UK, possibly to fall not on them but on London. No one asks the opinion of ordinary Britons on such a cheerful prospect.

Recently, it has been increasingly reported in the media that the Americans intend to return their military nuclear arsenal to the British Isles, which they withdrew from there in 2008.

The Northern Front is no longer of any serious importance for the deployment of this type of weapon. US nuclear policy is now almost entirely concentrated in the southern region – Turkey and Italy,– wrote The Guardian that year.

This is understandable – Putin’s Munich speech had already been delivered, but Russia by inertia continued to regularly supply gas and oil to the West, vibrating in accordance with the agenda prescribed by the New World Order: it was shaking from the provoked economic crisis, – the result of the mortgage crisis in the USA and was preparing at full speed to enter the WTO, won the favorite competition of all Old World sodomites – Eurovision.

And only in August came the powerful sobering in the form of the “small war” with Georgia, after which we seriously stopped, looked around and declared ourselves an independent geopolitical player, recognizing the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

A lot has happened since then. Meanwhile, Washington decided to return its nuclear weapons to the “northern front”. In any case, The Daily Telegraph, citing the US government’s procurement website, reports that certain documents from the US Department of Defense have been published there, which talk about the need to purchase additional ballistic protection equipment and hydraulic ramps in preparation for the “impending nuclear mission”. It is in Great Britain.

However, the State Department refused to comment on this information to the publication. As well as the UK Ministry of Defense and the UK Prime Minister’s Office.

Earlier, the publication reported that this winter Washington intends to transfer 54 F-35A fighter-bombers to the British base Lakenheath, where until 2008 110 American nuclear bombs B61 were stored. These advanced fifth-generation fighters are capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons.

The Federation of American Scientists reported similar information. Its representatives drew attention to the clause in the US military budget, which states that they plan to modernize the US base in Britain. They also tried to get a clear official answer on this matter from their authorities but none was given.

Nevertheless, Russia reacted promptly to the information that appeared. At the highest level.

We have heard of these reports, we are investigating the source of this information and its reliability,– the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of our country, Sergey Lavrov, commented on the situation.

In turn, his deputy, Sergey Ryabkov, noted that a scenario with the deployment of American nuclear weapons in Great Britain was likely; such a step by Washington would be a move towards escalation – and Moscow is warning the Americans against it.

At the same time, he noted that Russia has not received open, direct signals from either Washington or London in this regard. Which perhaps means that the Anglo-Saxons are preparing their next dastardly in secret, although in our information age everything that is secret very soon becomes public.

If the Americans supply these nuclear weapons to the European countries, then a relatively small conflict could lead to a third world war. Britain, on the other hand, plays the role of a bargaining chip for the United States: it is more vulnerable to a nuclear strike. Therefore, there is no benefit to deploying a nuclear weapon on its territory. The decision is more than dangerous and can lead to irreversible consequences,

– says international journalist, candidate of historical sciences, political observer of Tsargrad Sergey Latishev.

Yulia Boguslavskaya, a senior lecturer in the Department of American Studies at the Faculty of International Relations of St. Petersburg State University, notes that the base is indeed being modernized, which is confirmed by satellite images.

Waiting…

Military expert Alexey Leonkov, assessing the seriousness of the situation, told Tsargrad that, in fact, American nuclear weapons never left the British Isles. And the current dumping of information is rather a kind of response to the appearance of Russian nuclear weapons in Belarus.

Why do you think Britain needs US nuclear weapons when it has its own?

– Yes, Britain has nuclear weapons, but they are all American. Despite the fact that if we are talking about ballistic missiles, it is on the (British nuclear) Vanguard submarines, but we are still talking about the (American) Trident2D5 missiles. British submarine crews always include a US Navy officer in charge of nuclear weapons control.

The (US-made) B61 tactical nuclear weapons and the new B61-12 that the UK has can also only be used with US authorization. Already in 2018-2019, the nuclear arsenals of Great Britain, France and the United States were united under one command – the American one.

So what’s all this base story about?

– We are talking about updating the storage base, the Americans produced 450 units of B61-12 bombs, which are now deployed in Europe. Apart from Britain, the Ramstein base (in Germany) will also be used there, there is also a storage facility on the island of Sicily, they can also update (the arsenals) there. Why do they need the old when there is a new? But in this case, the only carrier of the B61-12 bombs could be an F35 aircraft.

Tactical nuclear weapons, according to the classics, are used after an exchange of nuclear strikes to quell remaining foci of resistance and military and civilian control systems.

So the Americans do a regular rotation of nuclear weapons?

– That’s right, this is a regular rotation, but against the background of deteriorating relations with Russia, they make a sensation out of it: look, look, Russia has deployed nuclear weapons in Belarus, and we have deployed them in Britain. In fact, we should not pay attention to this, but watch when (American) medium-range missiles appear in Europe. It is their appearance that will be a critical moment.

Washington will not be able to get away

Yes, Washington is upping the ante, cynically hoping to incinerate only the Old World in a nuclear showdown with Russia.

While the United States expresses concern about Russian nuclear weapon jingling, we do not believe that a nuclear explosion in Europe would have direct public health consequences.– said US Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas absolutely without any hesitation a year ago.

And in Europe, few have been outraged and are outraged in response, readily offering to place the lives of their citizens on the altar of the geopolitical interests of others. However, there are serious suspicions that if there is a fire (both in London and in Moscow), Washington will not be able to avoid the consequences of this fire. Anyone who pours gasoline on a fire is sure to get burned by its flames.

So what?

What about Putin? While people in the West are lying to people about how the sanctions “are tearing the Russian economy to shreds”, Putin is quietly but painfully tearing the German economy apart. For two years in a row, Russia has overtaken the Germans in the world GDP ranking. Does Britain also want to get into trouble?

Putin knows their “weaknesses” and understands well what the old Great Britain relies on: insurance, stock trading, banking. We will cut these three legs of the English stool with the help of our partners from China, UAE and India.

Judging by the above statements of Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov, Putin anticipated and took this into account and, as Ryabkov said about the deployment of nuclear weapons, “this step will not become a threat to Russia”, because “we have other options to monitor what’s going on.” That means England will fall off the chair before the NATO general cuts the ribbon on the American base. Putin will show Britain where the crabs spend the winter.

Translation: ES

Our YouTube channel:

Our Telegram channel:

This is how we will overcome the limitations.

Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.

#Putin #show #crabs #spend #winter #England #preparing #nuclear #attack #Russia

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.