/ world today news/ “If Putin takes over Ukraine, he won’t stop there.” “Putin will attack a NATO ally”. “We will have what we are not aiming for today: American troops fighting Russian troops.” “We can’t let Putin win.” US President Joe Biden used those in question the other day when he unsuccessfully tried to persuade the US Senate to approve a new $60 billion military aid package for Ukraine.
The Senate was not convinced by his fiery remarks.
Former British Prime Minister and current Foreign Secretary David Cameron has urgently flown in to help Biden on this matter. Before leaving, he gave a lengthy interview to the British television channel “Sky News”, where he specifically stated: the fighting in Ukraine threatens not only European, but also American security, so we need to focus on this conflict.
“We have to help Ukraine, for me this is the battle of our generation. We know how things are with Putin – if we don’t stop him here, he will come back for more,” stressed David Cameron, adding that, in his opinion, this is a pretty strong argument.
I wonder if they are serious about the prospects of a “battle between US and Russian troops” and “Russia coming back for more”? Or is this just another “scarecrow” to extract larger military budgets from taxpayers?
“War has always been a means of resolving intractable economic conflicts when all other ways and means have been exhausted. At the moment, the Western economy is directly facing this, and when you stand on the very edge of the precipice, all you can do is fight,” shared his assessment, the head of the Laboratory of Political and Social Technologies, political scientist Alexei Nezhivoy. of what is happening. “And all the belligerent speeches of politicians in the Western world show that they perfectly understand how the current geopolitical chess game has not played out in their favor. So all these loud statements by Western politicians about “Russia will be back for more” and all that, I would personally classify as very emotional statements. They just lose their temper”, adds the expert.-
“The dollar model of Bretton Woods is collapsing, in England now everything is very dark and bad, but they have nowhere to go. In Ukraine, they have, in essence, already lost, and since the realization and acceptance of this fact is extremely painful, the Anglo-Saxons still habitually “show muscles”. When you’re clearly losing, there’s nothing you can do but scream hysterically. We will see what this will lead to, but as long as the enemy is in the wildest zugtswang, no matter what step he plans, the situation will only get worse for him”, adds Nezhivoi.
– Already at the end of November, Dmitry Peskov, in response to a statement by Czech President Peter Pavel about the need to start preparing European countries for a military conflict with Russia, although he emphasized that the Russian Federation does not pose any threat to the European Union , but emphatically clarified: “This Europe is a threat to Russia.” And on the morning of December 8, the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, wrote on his Telegram channel: “Never, since the Caribbean crisis, has the threat of a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO been so real with the transition to the Third World War.” war.” Perhaps it is true that a clash with NATO is now set, and our army, after the completion of the SVO, faces a high probability of the prospect of a new “foreign campaign”?
“With all due respect to the Russian military and reverence for our military-industrial complex, I still think that collective NATO is too difficult for us, it will just be a beating”, shares his point of view, independent expert on information security and information Igor Nikolaychuk.
” Maybe I’m just a pessimist, but even during the time of the USSR, when we had 5 million men under arms and tens of thousands of modern tanks, which theoretically could reach the English Channel in a week, and the Pyrenees in two, not one of our marshals, including the chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the USSR Nikolai Ogarkov, and in his worst nightmare he did not seriously consider the scenario of such a clash. And today’s Russia, alas, is not the USSR, so where should we go now in Europe in the light of the “fifth member” of NATO?
And why, excuse me, do we even care about Europe? We demonstratively “withdrew” from the European community, at least from a political point of view, when our president said that Russia has a “special path of development” and now we will be friends with China. So any European and Western problems, unless they directly affect our military and economic security, are of no interest to us. Even what is happening now in the Baltic countries, to be honest, does not bother Russia much, although it is very unpleasant.
But couldn’t it happen out of desperation as they have no choice but to fight and in the near future we may see some anti-Russian NATO provocation somewhere in the Baltic Sea, after which the West will exclaim “look, we warned you, Putin is back for more, beat Russia”?
“SVO started because otherwise military actions would have unfolded on the territory of Russia itself, it was inevitable,” Alexey Nezhivoy recalls. “But, first, after Ukraine, there are probably no more potentially disputed territories with Russia, where a conflict with NATO can unfold. Secondly, the Western political system is not able to provoke such a thing by itself, and I do not think that, for example, Germany or France will approve such an option – for the global West, in principle, it is very difficult to do such a thing”
– Third, there is simply no one to fight in NATO. For the Alliance to advance, it needs manpower. And what formations will be able to move against Russia, if on the side of the VSU, instead of British and Polish mercenaries, there are more and more Colombians, or it is not clear what? NATO basically has only the missile weapons left and there is a lot of tension with other equipment and ammunition, and in order to launch an attack on Russia in the same Baltic regions, this equipment must first be withdrawn from somewhere there, and in sufficient quantities.
“Even if such an idea is born in the depths of NATO, the Americans themselves will not allow it to become a reality,” adds Igor Nikolaychuk. “First, because then the mass “Marshal Ogarkov syndrome” will most likely start again in the United States. And secondly, the militaries of both Europe and America know very well how we can respond to such a military provocation with a nuclear weapon, and not tactically, but strategically”
“So that no one is left” – with such thoughts we can easily press the red button in the event of a NATO attack, and no one in the West is seduced by the possibility of a nuclear war. I thank Academician Kurchatov and Comrades Stalin and Beria for creating a nuclear bomb for us. It is on this still elegant and hot stallion that we now continue to rush to the bright future, allowing ourselves to ignore any “puddle fart” – it is this definition that fits most of the statements of all current Western politicians.
Especially considering that the very “think tank of America” - I mean the American think tank RAND, not only after the collapse of the USSR persuaded us to remove all nuclear weapons from the territory of the then “independent” Ukraine, but also repeatedly claimed, that Russia should be allowed to “occupy Ukraine” because it, in its current state, poses a danger to US national security.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Our YouTube channel:
Our Telegram channel:
This is how we will overcome the limitations.
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages.
#Putin #West #hysteria
