© Kremlin.ru
–
Here are excerpts from his speech:
There is serious concern about the increase in US and NATO military forces next to Russia’s borders, as well as large-scale exercises, including outside the plan.
We are extremely concerned that elements of the US global anti-missile system are being deployed near Russia. The Mk 41 systems, located in Romania and planned for deployment in Poland, are adapted for the use of Tomahawk attack systems. If this infrastructure is moved further, if US and NATO missile systems appear in Ukraine, their flight to Moscow will be shortened to 7-10 minutes, and if hypersonic weapons are deployed – to 5. This is the most serious challenge. to our security.
We need long-term legally binding guarantees. We know you well – and this should not be believed, no legal guarantees, because the United States easily leaves all international treaties that for one reason or another are not interesting to them, explaining something there or no explanation at all, as happened with The Missile Defense Treaty, the Open Skies Treaty – “no”, and that’s it.
But at least something, there should be some legally binding agreements, not verbal assurances. We are well aware of the cost of such verbal promises. We can go back to recent history, to the events of the late 1980s and early 1990s, when we were told that your worries about possible NATO enlargement to the east were kind of unfounded. And five waves of NATO expansion to the east followed. And don’t you remember how it happened? When there were cloudless relations between Russia and the United States, Russia and all major NATO countries, almost allied.
I have said it publicly – American specialists were constantly visiting the sites of the nuclear weapons complex of the Russian Federation. They went to work every day, there were US flags on the desks. And what more? What else do you need? There were American advisers in the Russian government, and CIA staff advised us. What else? Why did they have to support separatism in the North Caucasus, with the help of Islamic State – well, it was not Islamic State, other terrorist organizations were? Apparently they supported terrorists. Why? Why did NATO have to expand, to withdraw from missile defense treaties?
What is happening now, the tensions in Europe, are their fault. At every step Russia was forced to respond somehow, at every step the situation was getting worse, getting worse, getting worse – degrading and degrading. And today we are in a situation where we are forced to decide something: we cannot allow the situation I am talking about to develop. What, isn’t something clear to someone? He must be clear.