Iglesias’ lawyer Marcos Pacheco said he was not surprised by the investigator’s decision. “We expected such a resolution,” he said.
Likewise, he said that in the trial “those witnesses who were of vital importance were not evaluated”. In reference to several witnesses who were part of the evidence proposed by the defense, with the position of prosecutors, judges and lawyers, including former prosecutor and current deputy Gustavo Zubía.
“Elements emerge that separate the Church from a certain type of a certain type of responsibility. What the defendant does is open a wide range at the time of resolution in which he characterizes a minor, serious and very serious crime. Leaving the discretion of the decider, who is the prosecutor of the Court who is the one who has to evaluate,” added Pacheco, who hopes Juan Gómez will look at the witnesses. “When we offer evidence, we offer a wide range of evidence from people who they have known the system, the functioning of the prosecutor’s office and the institution for a long time. They know the details,” he said.
Furthermore, he specified that “since 2011 a policy has been installed in the Prosecutor’s Office to make certain types of summaries where appropriate, having consulted the TCA sentence, they canceled. Today there are four sanctions that have been canceled by the TCA to other prosecutors, where Juan Pedro ends up paying a large sum of money for hasty decisions.”
Depending on the resolution of the court prosecutor, Juan Gómez, and in case of dismissal, Pacheco and Iglesias will opt for the administrative court route. In case of revocation, the resolution must have the approval of the Senate. Previously, Iglesias and his defense must present defenses.
One of the points for which Iglesias was investigated was the complaint by the defense of the rape victim in Cordón, which indicated that she had learned from the press of the modification of the defendant’s precautionary measures. «The prosecutor made statements and spoke in a generic way. In any case, there has always been dialogue», says the lawyer now.
