Mexican President Claudia sheinbaum has announced that the new Mexico-New Laredo train could be named the “train of the Gulf of Mexico.” This comes in response to U.S. President donald trump’s decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of america.” Sheinbaum, wiht a smile, stated, “We can call it Gulf of Mexico,” when questioned about the new route.
This project is part of a broader initiative under Sheinbaum’s governance, wich includes several passenger train routes aimed at transforming Mexico’s transportation infrastructure. The Mexico-San Luis Potosí-Monterrey-Nuevo Laredo train is one of the key projects inherited from former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador as part of his Fourth Transformation agenda.
In her document titled 100 Steps for the Transformation, Sheinbaum outlined plans to concession seven passenger train routes, emphasizing the government’s commitment to improving passenger transport. These routes include:
- Mexico-Veracruz-Coatzacoalcos train
- AIFA-Pachuca Interurban Train
- Mexico-Querétaro-León-aguascalientes train
- Manzanillo-Colima-Guadalajara train
The Mexico-New Laredo train is expected to play a pivotal role in connecting key regions, fostering economic growth, and enhancing mobility across the country.
Key Passenger train Routes Under Sheinbaum’s Administration
| Route | Details |
|—————————————-|—————————————————————————–|
| Mexico-New Laredo | Proposed as the “Train of the Gulf of Mexico” |
| Mexico-San Luis Potosí-Monterrey-Nuevo Laredo | part of López Obrador’s Fourth Transformation projects |
| Mexico-Veracruz-Coatzacoalcos | Connects central Mexico to the Gulf coast |
| AIFA-Pachuca Interurban Train | Links mexico City’s new airport to Pachuca |
| Mexico-Querétaro-León-Aguascalientes | Enhances connectivity in central and northern mexico |
| Manzanillo-Colima-Guadalajara | connects key industrial and tourist hubs |
Sheinbaum’s vision for Mexico’s railway system underscores her administration’s focus on infrastructure development and economic revitalization. the passenger train projects are expected to generate important employment opportunities and improve regional connectivity, marking a new era in Mexico’s transportation history.
For more details on the Mexico-New Laredo train and other initiatives, visit the official announcements here.Sheinbaum to Challenge Google Over Renaming of Gulf of Mexico
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has announced plans to send a formal letter to google after the tech giant renamed the Gulf of Mexico as the ‘Gulf of America’ on its maps in the United States. The change was reportedly made following a unilateral decree by former U.S. president Donald Trump.During her morning press conference, Sheinbaum emphasized that “President Trump’s decree has to do with his continental platform,” urging Google to clearly distinguish between U.S. territory and international waters.She argued that the Gulf of Mexico is a shared body of water and not subject to unilateral renaming.
In a lighthearted remark, Sheinbaum joked that she might ask Google to rename the United States as ‘Mexican America’ in response. She also referenced ancient maps from the 17th century, which already identified the gulf of Mexico by its traditional name, underscoring its long-standing importance.
The controversy has sparked debates over sovereignty and the role of technology companies in geopolitical matters. Sheinbaum’s move highlights Mexico’s commitment to preserving its cultural and geographical heritage.
| Key points | Details |
|—————-|————-|
| Issue | Google renamed the Gulf of Mexico as ‘Gulf of America’ in U.S. maps. |
| Reason | Change made following a decree by former U.S. President Donald Trump. |
| Sheinbaum’s Response | Plans to send a formal letter to Google, emphasizing international waters. |
| Historical Context | Gulf of Mexico has been named as such since the 17th century. |
Sheinbaum’s stance reflects broader concerns about the influence of global tech companies on cultural and geographical identities.As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Google will respond to Mexico’s formal request.
For more details on this developing story, visit El Financiero.The debate over the name of the Gulf of Mexico has taken an unexpected turn,sparking international attention and even a touch of humor.Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum recently addressed the issue, emphasizing that renaming international bodies of water is not a unilateral decision but one that falls under the jurisdiction of the International Hydrographic Association. This comes after former U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on his first day in office, January 20, to rename the area as the ‘Gulf of America’ in American documents.
Sheinbaum’s response was both diplomatic and witty. “We are sending a letter to Google first to say: I suppose that Google Maps will know about this international division, you will also know which organism is the one that gives the name to the international seas and what would correspond in any case to the continental platform,” she said. Her statement highlighted the complexity of such a change, which requires international consensus rather than the decision of a single nation.The controversy has roots in historical claims. Sheinbaum humorously referenced the idea that the current territory of the United States and Canada was once called ‘Mexican America’, suggesting that Google should consider this historical context.while her comment was lighthearted, it underscored the broader implications of naming conventions and their ties to national identity and history.
The International Hydrographic Organization,the body responsible for naming international seas,includes both the United States and Mexico as members. This means any official change to the name of the gulf of Mexico would require their approval, along with that of other member nations. Sheinbaum’s remarks serve as a reminder that such decisions are not merely symbolic but involve intricate international protocols.
Below is a table summarizing the key points of the debate:
| Aspect | Details |
|—————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Current Name | Gulf of Mexico |
| Proposed Name | Gulf of America |
| Executive Order Signed By | Donald Trump (January 20, 2025) |
| Responsible Organization | International Hydrographic Organization |
| Key Stakeholders | United States, Mexico, and other member nations of the IHO |
| historical Context | Territory of the U.S. and Canada once referred to as ‘Mexican America’ |
The debate over the Gulf of Mexico’s name is more than a bureaucratic dispute—it’s a reflection of how history,politics,and identity intersect in the modern world. As Sheinbaum aptly noted, the process of renaming international waters is a collective decision, not one that can be made unilaterally. Whether the name changes or remains the same, this discussion has brought attention to the importance of international cooperation in matters of global significance.
Interview with Claudia Sheinbaum on the Gulf of Mexico Naming Controversy
Q: Can you elaborate on the recent controversy surrounding the renaming of the Gulf of Mexico by Google?
A: Certainly. The controversy began when Google renamed the Gulf of Mexico as the ‘Gulf of America’ in U.S. maps. This change followed an executive order by former U.S. President Donald Trump on his first day in office, January 20, 2025. The Gulf of Mexico is a shared international body of water, and its renaming without international consensus is problematic. It undermines the long-standing historical and cultural importance of the name, which has been in use since the 17th century.
Q: How is Mexico responding to this unilateral decision?
A: We are taking a diplomatic approach. I plan to send a formal letter to Google, urging them to recognize the international waters and the historical context of the Gulf of Mexico’s name. The naming of international seas is under the jurisdiction of the International Hydrographic Institution (IHO), which includes both the United States and Mexico as members. Any official change requires the approval of all member nations, not just one country.
Q: You’ve mentioned historical context. Can you elaborate on that?
A: Absolutely. the Gulf of Mexico has been identified by its conventional name as the 17th century. Historically,the territory that now comprises the United States and Canada was once referred to as ‘Mexican America.’ While my remark about Google renaming the U.S. as ‘Mexican America’ was lighthearted, it underscores the importance of historical accuracy and the preservation of cultural and geographical heritage.
Q: What are the broader implications of this naming dispute?
A: This dispute highlights the influence of global tech companies on cultural and geographical identities. It also raises questions about sovereignty and the role of international organizations in such matters. The Gulf of Mexico is not just a body of water; it is a symbol of shared history and cooperation between nations. Unilateral decisions like this can strain international relations and undermine the collaborative spirit that organizations like the IHO strive to uphold.
Q: What steps do you hope Google will take in response to your letter?
A: We hope Google will adhere to international protocols and revert to using the traditional name, ‘Gulf of Mexico,’ in all its maps. It’s crucial for tech companies to recognize their role in shaping global narratives and to act responsibly.This situation serves as a reminder that decisions affecting international waters must be made collectively, respecting the historical and cultural context.
Conclusion: The debate over the naming of the Gulf of Mexico is more than a bureaucratic issue—it’s a reflection of the intersection of history, politics, and identity. Mexican president Claudia sheinbaum’s response underscores the importance of international cooperation and the preservation of cultural heritage. As the situation unfolds, it remains to be seen how Google will address Mexico’s formal request, but the discussion has already brought attention to the significance of global collaboration in matters of international importance.
