Text/CTWANT
▲A property rights dispute broke out in Keelung City’s East Coast Plaza.
The OT contract for Keelung City’s East Coast three-dimensional parking lot and plaza expired, and the Keelung City Transportation Department ordered the delivery on January 31. However, the original operator NET insisted on owning the property rights of the mall. Lawyer Cai Yijing raised six major doubts. The Keelung City Government has not obtained the ownership of the building built solely by NET. “Why can it be directly included in the scope of investment? To whom should it be given?”
Netizens posted on Dcard that the 2-4 floors of Keelung East Coast Plaza, which was built solely by NET, actually cost nearly 300 million yuan. All construction project contracts and expenditures were independently completed by NET, and the Keelung City Government did not acquire the building. ownership, but took the property by force and included it directly in the investment scope, and then prepared to rent it to Breeze at a super low price.
Lazy Bag pointed out that in the early morning of the 1st, the Keelung City Government illegally led city personnel and locksmiths by the Traffic Director/Section Chief, and a large number of police officers led by the Director of the First Branch of the Keelung City Police Department, as well as more than a dozen policemen in black. Clothes-wearing people gathered outside the East Bank Plaza. Afterwards, all the people did not identify themselves, explain the basis for law enforcement, or answer any questions. Police officers formed a human wall to protect civil servants who illegally exercised public power, and let the locksmith use a chainsaw. Open the door, change the lock, and then a group of unknown men in black will invade.
Lawyer Cai Yijing raised six major doubts on Facebook, saying that there are many doubts and please evaluate yourself before investing. She pointed out that, first, the Keelung City Government has not obtained the ownership of the building built solely by NET. “Why can it be directly included in the investment scope? To whom is it given?” “Second, after Wei Feng was announced as the best applicant, why did all the investment documents need to be removed from the shelves?
Third, I faxed the request to change the rules less than two hours before the investment selection. Otherwise, the briefing cannot be made. Who are the rules tailor-made for? Fourth, the city government’s rent assessment is one-fifth of 7-11’s rent price. To whom will it potentially give away nearly 4 billion yuan in 30 years? But when the breeze comes, will the rent increase?
Fifth, the city government announced that Breeze would invest 250 million yuan (announced on 1/31 was 308 million yuan). However, according to the feasibility assessment, the revenue in 30 years will be at least 21.6 billion yuan. The investment amount is less than 2% of the revenue, and it still has to pay 30 million yuan. Year? Sixth, investment promotion requires public opinion fees of at least 20 million yuan, and requires the city government to provide legal basis? What are the usage rules and review authority mechanism?
Further reading
2024-02-04 07:19:00
#NET #spent #RMB #million #build #shopping #mall #unhappy #giving #lazy #lawyer #raised #doubts #Keelung #East #Coast #Plaza #dispute #Life #Sanli #News #Network #SETN.COM
