/ world today news/ Businesses and ministers declare that they will not attend the ninth annual meeting of entrepreneurs and the government, organized by Ivo Prokopiev. This year’s “Capital” event will be held for the first time without the support of the Confederation of Employers and Industrialists in Bulgaria.
“KRIB does not consider this event to be its own, and even the previous Board of Directors with chairman Ognyan Donev decided not to participate in it. This is a private event from which “Capital” profits.” This is how Kiril Domuschiev, chairman of the employers’ organization, commented on the withdrawal from the forum.
The Prime Minister and his ministers can go to any private party they see fit. The point is that it’s not just the money for participation – in this case BGN 704. per person, but also the sponsorship that KRIB members have to pay. For example, “Sopharma” gave BGN 20,000, “Huvepharma” also gave. These are funds that go into the coffers of the organizer Economedia.
Vasil Velev, chairman of the Association of Industrial Capital, commented to “Press” that AIKB will not be a co-organizer and he personally will not attend the meeting because he did not consider it necessary.
Dissatisfaction was also seen among the rulers. As the organizers rolled out a program that included much of the cabinet, some ministers took offense.
“I had not received an invitation until today (yesterday – b.r.) and I was offended. I don’t think I’m going to this meeting. I will discuss it with the prime minister,” commented Economy Minister Bozhidar Lukarski to “Press”.
Deputy Prime Minister Meglena Kuneva is also not sure whether she will honor Prokopiev’s event, claiming that she is still thinking about the matter. “It is more important to be able to remove the barriers to business,” she explained to Radio K2.
#Prokopiev #total #isolation #business #power
**Past:** How have previous iterations of the “Capital” forum contributed to the dialog between the Bulgarian business community and the government? Have there been instances of similar controversies or withdrawals in the past, and if so, what were the outcomes?
## World Today News – Interview: “Prokopev’s Capital Forum: A Break in Tradition?”
**Host:** Welcome to World Today News. Today we delve into the surprising news of significant withdrawals from Ivo Prokopiev’s annual “Capital” forum. Joining us are Mr. Kiril Domuschiev, Chairman of the Confederation of Employers and Industrialists in Bulgaria (KRIB), and Ms. Meglena Kuneva, Deputy Prime Minister of Bulgaria. Welcome to both of you.
**I. The Withdrawal of KRIB**
**Host:** Mr. Domuschiev, KRIB’s withdrawal from the “Capital” forum marks a departure from previous years. Could you elaborate on the reasons behind this decision, especially KRIB’s perspective on the forum’s nature and purpose?
*How does KRIB see the forum evolving in the future?*
*Do you think this withdrawal signifies a potential shift in the relationship between the business community and organizations like ”Capital”?*
**II. Concerns Regarding Sponsorship and Financial Implications**
**Host:** Mr. Domuschiev, you mentioned concerns about the financial implications of KRIB’s involvement, including participation fees and sponsorship commitments. Could you delve deeper into those concerns?
*Do you believe these financial aspects are justifiable, given the forum’s goals and outcomes?*
*What are the broader implications for businesses when considering sponsorship of events like “Capital”?*
**III. The Government’s Perspective: A Divided Front**
**Host:** Deputy Prime Minister Kuneva, the article mentions some discomfort among government officials regarding the forum’s organization and guest list. You yourself expressed hesitation about attending. Could you share your perspective on these concerns?
*What are your main reservations regarding the “Capital” forum this year?*
*Do you believe this situation reflects a broader tension between the government and the private sector?*
**Host:** Both Minister Lukarski and you have expressed concerns about the process of invitation and inclusion.
*How do you see the government’s role in such events, and what are your expectations from organizers?*
**IV. The Future of Business-Government Dialogue in Bulgaria**
**Host:** This situation raises important questions about the future of dialog between the business community and the government in Bulgaria.
*Mr. Domuschiev, what alternative platforms or initiatives could foster more constructive and transparent communication?*
*Ms. Kuneva, how can the government ensure that crucial business voices are heard and concerns addressed effectively?*
**Host:** Ultimately,
*What are your hopes for the future of business-government relations in Bulgaria?*
**V. Closing Remarks**
**Host:** Thank you both for your insightful perspectives. This discussion sheds light on the complexities and challenges of navigating business-government partnerships. As we move forward, open communication and a willingness to collaborate will be crucial for fostering a thriving economic landscape in Bulgaria.
—
This format allows for a nuanced discussion, exploring both the immediate concerns surrounding the “Capital” forum and the broader implications for business-government relations in Bulgaria. The open-ended questions encourage both guests to share their perspectives, potentially revealing different viewpoints and fostering a deeper understanding of the issues at hand.
