Home » today » News » Prith ‘that’s very annoying’

Prith ‘that’s very annoying’

It means that something is different from the textbook. No…it must all be wrong!

It’s hard to watch…

More than that, I saw him standing there, eyes hard as corn soaked in liquid in a cold room. Download the democracy book

Presenting “7 packages” to change the constitution yesterday (September 26, 2024) too.

I have to cry…sigh!

Is something wrong, Mr. Ice cream?

You set the standard for that. Only laws come from MPs and Senators from the “parliamentary system”. “Democracy” adheres to the people

Moreover, it is not democratic.

For example, laws from the time of NCPO or the time of non-elected government.

You reject all “disgust-disapproval”!

Ready to “wear an eye shield”, a stranger says this is the way the Orange Party pulled yesterday, saying

“The People’s Party has always demonstrated that the 2017 Constitution has problems with democratic legitimacy.

Both origin, process, and content

Therefore, the amendment of the Constitution must proceed along two parallel tracks, namely

– Prepare a new constitution with democratic legitimacy as soon as possible by all elected MPs. By another way,

– Amendment of the Constitution section by section on important and urgent issues.

So the People’s Party put the idea forward, Issues in amending the Constitution section by section By dividing the matter into 7 packages.

Package 1: “Wipe up after the cup.

Package 2 “Defining the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court., independent agency

Package 3 “Increase the equipment to detect corruption”

Package 4 “Protection of human rights and freedoms”

Package 5: “Reform the Armed Forces”

Package 6: “Improve the effectiveness of parliament”

Package 7: “Changing the Criteria for Amending the Constitution”

Hee hee…

It is blind to listen to “Democracy” that monks praise as a lamp without light to guide the way.

Think of the “Dhamma Tales” of Luang Pu Cha “Phra Bodhiyan Thera (Cha Suphattho)” Wat Nong Pa Pong, Ubon Ratchathani.

He doesn’t have a foreign word….

But he brought Buddhism to teach foreigners in Europe, in the United States, and in Asia, so much so that “foreigners – different languages”, both foreigners and Asians, wanted to be ordained monks.

There are no less than 200 temples and monasteries in the line of Luang Pu Cha in different countries.

“Luang Pu Cha” was the first monk who spread the teachings of the Buddha to the West. You can say that.

To this day, Buddhism has gained a strong position in Europe. “Strict – Firm” in practice, just The “heart of Buddhism” is even better than those found in many temples in Thailand.

Someone once asked about politics and expressed their views on democracy with “Luang Pu Cha”.

Buddhism is the religion of intelligent people.

Therefore, “Luang Pu Cha” does not teach people directly. Instead, it is taught through metaphors and similes as a “dhamma trick” for listeners to use their own wisdom to go through.

In this person’s case….

Luang Pu was respected and said

“Reverend Father, I think democracy is good. People will especially respect the decision of the majority. “

“It is not always right,” said Luang Pu Cha. Yom asked again: “How is that not right??

Luang Pu Cha also said that it was a Dharma strategy.

“For example, 20 flies, 10 bees, and 20 flies say, ‘The poop is sweet and delicious.’

But 10 bees said, “Honey is sweet and tasty.”

If we speak according to democratic principles, “flies win” over bees because they have “more” votes.

The bee lost because of “fewer” votes.

Humans are what we call “noble animals” with more wisdom than these animals. Who should we believe??

This “dharma story” is widely spread. A wise man will explain the mystery and understand it. According to Luang Pu, the story of flies and bees is similar.

means “judgment by” Sometimes “democratic principles” are not always correct. If you don’t take the main “Dhammatipathai” going in to decide”

And Prit … are you a “bee” or a “fly”?

Degree in “Political Philosophy and Economics,” Gold Medal, Oxford Surely the understanding!

But to make a distinction, we must first clearly understand our “status”, whether we are a fly or a bee.

Or is “human status” a person?

When a person knows about the status of a monk, he is a “noble animal” and must surely have more information than the animals.

Therefore, whether it is “democratic” or “not democratic” must be understood to be determined by the hands of the parliamentary system. “Electoral democracy” or in the “Democratic Dictatorship” system cannot be set.

“Dharmathipathai” must be used as the final decision!

This is not a joke. I dragged him into the temple.

You have to “Dhamma” to understand what kind of living and non-living things. He rises – lives – passes.

Or to say it again, “rotational change” is permanent.

Everything includes time, time, and status When you are ready It rotates – changes. From one form to another according to the cause-factor that it must be alone

Prith need not be “John Locke,” the father of democracy in the 21st century.

It is better to be a fan of “On Lock Yun” ….

Sitting down and eating breakfast is often a way to create a democratic experience from “many lives – many generations”

Maybe knowing the real way of Thai democracy makes the “plastic flowers” smell better.

Theories and principles according to textbooks cannot be used to decide on “democracy-dictatorship” alone.

It must be “knowledge” for the sake of society There are bee people Both the people and the flies

Therefore, in some cases the use of “many” is considered democratic.

That’s the principle. “Citizen Insect”

It is not right – it is not fair according to the principles. “human citizen”

Like writing the law to make it easier to separate “Kingdom” became a republic

Write laws that do not focus on “morality and ethics” so that they are easy to understand, easy to eat – easy to cheat – easy to live.

Just “many hands” in the council system. It means that those are proper democracies.

It is right according to the democracy of flies.

But it is “wrong – unfair” according to human democracy, whose “dharma” must be at the heart of social rules and regulations.

Prit said, “The current law,” wrote the NCPO, “is not democratic. It all has to be taken apart. “

If…..

The democratic system established by the “People’s Party” in 1932 is not correct, not democratic, and must be dismantled because it did not follow the parliamentary system.

But he came from the “Party of the People” who used force to steal the royal authority. “The King” came.

That is the same as the People’s Party. Be a dictator!

And what Prit said “Disgusted – reject” every law – every order of NCPO Must be suspended Because it is not democratic Not connected to the people

So Prit and the Som Party must be removed from MP status today.

Because all of you were born from a totalitarian foundation. to have elections When it is shameful Repeal that law.

MP, you and the Orange Party There is no law to support it. You can no longer be an MP!

You see, Parit…”knowledge overloaded but can’t live” speaking in a cool way, with no real world experience. If you cannot separate cause and effect, you will destroy yourself.

Don’t think less than a worm in a bucket of shit…Prit

A worm eats dirt for a living.

But Prit is a man and he has a brain that thinks with a conscience beyond worms.

reform the military Abolish military conscription There is war every now and then.

Prit…when are you hungry? Go do it then. Is that so?

If there were no soldiers today

Prit and the Som gang have to shovel mud to the villagers in Mae Sai instead…do they want it?

Go home, shower, put on some powder, then eat some milk and go to sleep…Prit.?!

Silver flame

27 September 2024

a man at the end of the road

2024-09-26 17:01:18
#Prith #annoying

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.