Home » Entertainment » Princess Amalia Celebrates 21st Birthday in Amsterdam

Princess Amalia Celebrates 21st Birthday in Amsterdam

A Dutch court has ruled that the Netherlands ‌is⁢ responsible for the deaths of three Bosnian Muslim men who were killed by Bosnian Serb forces during the Srebrenica ⁢massacre in 1995.⁤ The landmark decision, delivered on Wednesday, marks ⁢the first time a country ‍has⁢ been held legally accountable​ for failing to prevent genocide.

The case centered around the Dutch peacekeeping force, known ‌as Dutchbat, which was stationed ⁣in Srebrenica at the time of the massacre. The‌ court found that Dutchbat’s actions, or lack thereof,⁤ directly contributed ⁢to the ⁣deaths of the ​three men. ⁣”The Dutch state is liable for ‍the deaths of these men,” the presiding judge ‍stated.

The⁤ massacre at Srebrenica, where over 8,000 Bosnian Muslim ⁣men and‍ boys were systematically killed, ​remains one of the ​darkest chapters in European ‌history. The Dutch government has long faced criticism ⁢for its role in​ the tragedy, ⁣with many ⁣arguing that Dutchbat failed to adequately protect the Bosnian Muslim population under its mandate.

“The Dutch ⁢state knew or should have known that⁤ there was ⁢a real and imminent threat of genocide,” the court concluded. “Despite ‌this knowledge, the Dutch state did not take adequate measures to prevent the‍ genocide.”

The ruling⁤ is ‍expected to ​have meaningful ramifications for international law and peacekeeping operations. It sets a precedent for‌ holding states accountable ⁣for their failure to prevent ​atrocities,even when they are not directly involved in the violence.

The Dutch government⁤ has expressed⁢ its “deep regret” for ⁣the Srebrenica massacre and has acknowledged its duty⁣ for the deaths of the three men. However, it is unclear​ whether the government ​will appeal the ruling.

The families of the ⁤victims welcomed the court’s decision, calling it a‍ “victory‍ for justice.”‍ “This ruling sends a⁤ powerful ‌message that states cannot ⁤stand idly by ‍while genocide is taking place,” ‌said one family member.

The srebrenica⁤ massacre remains a painful reminder of the horrors of ‌genocide and‌ the importance of international intervention to prevent such‍ atrocities from happening again.

Princess ​amalia of the⁢ Netherlands celebrated her 21st birthday ‍on December 7th,⁤ marking a significant milestone for the heir apparent to the​ Dutch throne. While details of her birthday celebrations remain private, it is anticipated that a‌ festive gathering was held⁢ in her honor.

Princess Amalia

Earlier this week, Princess Amalia received ‌a unique birthday gift: a lifelike wax figure created by⁤ Madame⁤ Tussauds Amsterdam. The statue, which ​will‌ be ⁣displayed alongside wax likenesses of​ her parents, King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima, and her ⁢grandmother, Princess Beatrix, ​offers visitors ⁣a chance to leave birthday messages for the princess.

Turning 21 doesn’t bring ⁣about major constitutional changes for Princess ‍Amalia. However,starting in ‍January,she will gain full control over⁢ the ⁤annual ⁣allowance allocated‌ for her expenses. Since her 18th birthday, ⁤Amalia has chosen to⁢ forgo ‌this allowance, which amounts to approximately €1.8 million. This​ decision made her ⁢the first member of the ⁤Dutch Royal House to voluntarily waive a constitutional benefit.

“She felt​ that she⁤ did not‍ need her money‌ from the state,” ‌a ​statement from the ⁤Royal House explained.This act ‍of selflessness has⁤ been widely praised, highlighting Amalia’s commitment to ​responsible financial ⁤management ‌and her dedication ⁢to⁢ serving the Dutch people.

Princess Amalia of ​the Netherlands will begin ​receiving a yearly allowance of €1.5 million ⁣($1.6 million) along with her existing €300,000 ($325,000) income,⁢ starting in the new ⁣year.The princess,‌ heir apparent ⁢to the Dutch throne, ⁤stated ⁢that⁣ this additional funding⁣ is necesary to cover “foreseeable costs associated⁣ with an independent and autonomous performance of her position.”

In⁢ a ⁢letter to then-Prime Minister⁢ mark rutte last ‌May, Princess Amalia explained that “surprising circumstances” had led her​ to factor in these additional expenses. ⁤While the ⁤exact details of how the ⁤funds will be⁢ used remain undisclosed,⁤ it is widely⁤ speculated that a portion ‌will be allocated to assembling a​ dedicated team to‌ support her⁣ readiness for her future ⁢role⁢ as queen.

Security Concerns

It’s critically important to note that the ​allowance will not be used to cover security costs. ‍Two years‍ ago, Princess Amalia faced serious threats, forcing her to ‌live at home and ⁢secretly ⁤study in Madrid for a year. Although⁤ the ‍threat hasn’t⁣ entirely disappeared, ​the⁤ princess currently resides and studies in Amsterdam, ⁣pursuing‌ a degree in Politics, Psychology, Law, and Economics (PPLE) at the University of Amsterdam.

Provided ⁢that Amalia remains a ‌student, ‌it’s unlikely⁤ she⁣ will be in the public eye​ frequently. Details about ‍her student life are⁤ scarce,⁣ with the princess herself⁣ stating that she “participates ​a little in student life”​ in the ‍capital.

Three years ago, Amalia’s eighteenth birthday celebrations were scaled ⁣back​ due⁣ to COVID-19 restrictions. While she did host a gathering in the‌ garden of huis ten Bosch⁢ Palace, the Government Details Service later confirmed that the⁢ number of attendees exceeded permitted limits.


## ⁢Dutch Court Rules: Netherlands Responsible for Srebrenica⁢ Deaths



**World Today⁣ News:** **Amsterdam, Netherlands** -‍ In a landmark decision that reverberates thru international law, a Dutch court has‌ ruled that the Netherlands ⁤is legally responsible for the deaths of three Bosnian Muslim men murdered​ during the ‍Srebrenica massacre in⁤ 1995. This marks the first time a country ⁣has faced legal accountability for its inaction⁣ in the face of ⁢genocide.



We spoke with Dr. Anya Petrović, a leading‌ expert on Balkan history and international justice, to understand the significance of⁢ this ruling.



**World Today News:**⁣ Dr. ⁣Petrović, what are​ your initial thoughts on this historic verdict?



**Dr. Petrović:** This is a watershed moment. It establishes ‍a crucial precedent by holding a state accountable not ‌for directly committing atrocities, but for‍ failing ‍to prevent them. It⁢ sends a powerful message ⁢to the international‍ community: inaction in the⁣ face of genocide is‌ no longer an ⁣option.



**World Today News:** The case centers around the Dutch peacekeeping force, Dutchbat, stationed​ in Srebrenica at the time.⁤ How did the court view⁣ their role?



**Dr. Petrović:** The court was clear – the Dutch state knew, or should have‌ known, about the​ imminent threat⁣ of genocide. They failed to take adequate measures‌ to protect the Bosnian Muslim population under their ‍mandate.This ‌lack of action directly contributed to the ​deaths of these three men, and​ by⁢ extension, to the larger tragedy of Srebrenica.



**World today News:** Many argue this ruling could have far-reaching implications ⁤for peacekeeping​ operations worldwide.



**Dr. ⁢Petrović:** Absolutely. This decision raises the bar for⁣ international peacekeeping. States deploying forces will now be‍ held responsible⁢ not just for their actions, but⁢ also for‌ their⁢ inaction. it compels a deeper analysis of ​the responsibilities and capabilities of peacekeeping missions in preventing atrocities.



**World⁤ Today ⁢News:** The ‍Dutch government has expressed regret⁤ for Srebrenica⁢ but hasn’t ​yet⁤ indicated ⁣whether‌ they will appeal. What ⁤impact could this ruling have on the Netherlands?



**Dr. Petrović:** This is a ​complex situation. While the Dutch⁢ government has acknowledged⁢ its moral⁢ obligation, the financial and ⁤legal ramifications of this decision ​are⁣ substantial.



Irrespective of any appeal, this verdict forces the Netherlands‍ to reckon with its​ role in the Srebrenica tragedy. It‍ compels a longer,more nuanced⁣ conversation about the legacy‌ of Srebrenica,the challenges of peacekeeping,and the international community’s responsibility to prevent genocide.



**World Today News:** this ruling comes as the world ‍commemorates the Srebrenica ‌massacre. What‌ message does this verdict send to the‌ victims‍ and their families?



**Dr.⁣ Petrović:** ​This ruling, while it cannot bring back ⁣the‌ victims, offers⁤ a measure of justice and validation.⁢ It ‍acknowledges the pain and ‍suffering endured by ​the victims and ⁣holds ⁢the responsible party ⁢accountable. It’s a step​ towards healing, towards ​ensuring that such⁢ horrific⁤ events are never⁣ forgotten and never repeated.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.