Prince Harry Accuses Tabloids of Inciting Hatred and Bullying in Landmark Court Testimony

He Prince Harry with turned into the first high-ranking member of the Royal family british what lends statement before a courtin the framework of a trial against a group that owns several tabloids, where he accused the press of “incite hatred and bullying“against him and to hold hands”bloodstained“.

The prince’s testimony came first in writing, with a lengthy text in which accuses the company that owns the The Daily Mirror to resort to illegal tactics to try to capture information, for example spying on his voicemails during his time at the elite college of Eton.

Harry, along with two television actors and the ex-wife of a comedian, accuse the media group of obtaining information about them between 1996 and 2011 through illegal methods, including phone hacking. “My voicemails included incredibly private and sensitive information“said the prince.

How was Lady Di’s accident that torments Prince Harry and Menghan Markle after their persecution

Prince, son of King Carlos III and 5th in the line of succession to the thronecame to “assume a lot of the headlines” that appeared in the media, from those describing him as a “playboy” to those describing him as “bigheaded” or even “irresponsible drug user“.

“I feel that in all relationships that I hadbe it with friends, girlfriends, relatives or in the Army, always was a third party involved, the tabloids”said Harry in the text delivered to the court, according to the chain Sky News.

Harry denounced an “invasion of the press for most of (his) life, to this day.” “Each one of these items caused me suffering,” he said. “Other people, friends, schoolmates would read the articles and their behavior would change,” he said. This made him feel “paranoid”, mistrust anyone and reduce his circle of friends, he stressed.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle suffered a “near catastrophic relentless paparazzi chase”

The prince returned to the United Kingdom to attend the trial that takes place in London, since he has resided in the United States since, together with his wife Meghan Markle, he decided to withdraw from his duties as a member of the Royal House. At this time, he also criticized his own family, accusing them of situations of harassment or racism.

Harry, who said he moved to the United States to protect his family from media persecution, said feeling watched made him “constantly suspect“from” everyone “, an aspect that he also relates to the case of his mother, the late Princess Diana of Wales.

“I always heard that people said that my father was paranoid, but he was not like that. He was afraid of what was happening to him and now I know that I felt the same way too”argument.

The ‘Game of Thrones’ in real life: the epic drama of Harry, Meghan and the Windsors

The Duke of Sussex defended his interest in “get to the bottom once and for all” for hold the media accountable for what he considers an “intrusion” into his private life. In his case, he limits the alleged excesses to the period between 1996 and 2010 and talks about wiretapping, deception or hiring detectives.

The prince’s arguments, which he also partially exposed in his recent public statements, are a direct criticism of the general media system in the UKsince it considers that the tabloid press he somehow felt “possessed” just because he was a member of the royal family.

The prince also launched an unusual criticism of the ties between the press and the British government: “Our country is judged globally by the state of our press and our government, and I think both are at the bottom,” he said.

And I add: “Democracy fails when the press fails to scrutinize and hold government to account, instead choosing to get into bed with them in order to ensure the status quo.”

The lawyers of the Mirror Group NewspapersFor their part, they allege that part of the information criticized by Harry was obtained before he had a telephone or that many others were already in the public domain. The court examines 33 of the 140 articles submitted by the plaintiffs, which amount to more than 2,500 published in 14 years.

ds