/ world today news/ Every resonant statement of Yevgeny Prigozhin today is interpreted only as a jab in the direction of the first persons of the Ministry of Defense and the General Staff of Russia. In addition, they allude to the election campaign of the PMC founder. However, it is precisely the misinterpretation of this rebellion against the background of the SVO that can disappoint us.
After the publication of a sensational interview with the head of PMC “Wagner” Yevgeny Prigozhin, an equally interesting statement by Kremlin Chairman Dmitry Peskov followed that Russia will not make any peace with Ukraine, but will continue to move forward. Is there a connection between these two events, said political scientist Andrei Perla.
In both Yevgeny Prigozhin’s statement and Dmitri Peskov’s statement, there is such a message that the end of WWI is still far away, the hostilities will continue and it is too early to relax.
In his recent interview with the media technologist Konstantin Dolgov Prigozhin actually directly and openly indicated that we must prepare for a very tough war, there is a serious opponent in front of us and we must gather all our forces so that he will win in the end.
As for internal strife, Prigozhin doubted that there would be any kind of revolution in Russia. According to him, it is really worth fearing NATO, which, with the help of Ukrainian troops, is trying to overthrow the Russian government, which does not suit the West.
The fact that the Ukrainian conflict should not be frozen was also stated by Dmitry Peskov in an interview with TASS. He said that in this Russia is in solidarity with the West, therefore it will achieve its goals “through a special military operation or other available means.”
“Russia is only considering the possibility of completing a special military operation: securing its interests, achieving the goals facing Russia, either through a special military operation or by other available means,” Peskov emphasized.
After THIS, there was a UAV attack on Moscow and the Moscow Region. AND THEN we learned that this is how – in emotions, almost in hysteria – the Kiev regime tried to answer us for the attack on the headquarters of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and the destruction of not only Ukrainian commanders, but also NATO officers .. .
Well, there will be no reconciliation. It is even more interesting to find out how far internal intrigues will lead us.
The political observer of “First Russian” Andrey Perla deals with the topic in the author’s show “Hidden Meanings”.
There will be no “shameful peace”
Commenting on the statement of the press secretary of the President of Russia, Andrey Perla noted that Peskov, according to his own words, apparently silenced the so-called “party of peace” in Russia for a long time. Because he said very clearly that there will be no “Korean equality” in Ukraine. This is not the goal of Russian foreign policy.
“Russia will not seek to freeze the conflict in Ukraine. And the enemy does not want to freeze the conflict now. So we are fighting to the bitter end. This means that there will not be the notorious indecent shameful peace,” emphasized Perla.
He noted that Russia strives to fulfill the goals of the SVO, which are defined as the security of the residents of Donbas, the opening of a land corridor to Crimea and the de-Nazification of Ukraine.
“Until all this happens permanently, you will have to fight. We will not allow the enemy to stand, to entrench themselves, to accumulate weapons for a further attack against us,” explained the political scientist.
According to him, most likely in the near future the “party of peace” will not have the opportunity to speak in the Russian media. And if the same Roman Abramovich or Mikhail Fridman appear in the public space, then the Western public will listen to them.
Because this notorious “family”, “boylars from the previous reign”, will no longer be able to exert any influence on the situation.
Many of them have already left. I think this process will continue. Whether it will be stimulated is a very controversial issue, according to Perla.
Prigogine’s statement
As for Prigozhin’s statement, according to the head of the “Club of the Regions” political scientist Sergey Starovoitov, this is “the most powerful speech of the “peace party” for the entire time of the SVO.” About which he writes in his Telegram channel.
“Starovoitov’s statement seems very paradoxical, since Prigozhin did not call for any peace,” noted Perla.
But the head of PMC “Wagner” spoke about three important things regarding the conduct of the SVO.
First, he told how, from the point of view of PMC Wagner, its fighters and commanders, things were happening during the Bakhmut attack. And this, according to the political scientist, is very valuable information, including for patriots.
“Because it was important for us to hear about the enemy’s losses more than three times ‘from these lips’. Considering that we stormed, this is a brilliant result,” Perla added.
The second part of the interview includes rather sharp criticism of the Minister of Defense Sergey Shoigu and the Chief of the Russian General Staff Valery Gerasimov.
However, whatever Prigozhin meant… But this kind of discord in our military leadership can only please the enemy. As a good Western book says: “Our quarrel will only please Mordor.”
Generals do not always make infallible decisions, but bringing this out into the public space, in the media, shows the lack of unity in our ranks. And this is not good for us, Perla is convinced.
To better explain his point, he gave an example from history. According to him, the Soviet marshals Konstantin Rokosovsky, Ivan Konev and Georgiy Zhukov did not tolerate each other. Especially Zhukov and Konev. So much so that on the set of the movie “Liberation”, where they were consultants and already many adults, the marshals got into a fight.
But never during the Great Patriotic War and in a nightmare could he imagine that in the newspaper “Pravda” or “Izvestia”, not to mention the reports of the Soviet Information Bureau, one marshal would accuse another of something.
It just couldn’t be. Well, we had terrible totalitarianism, communism, etc. It was also impossible to imagine something similar in the armies of the allied countries and in the Nazi army, – noted Tsargrad’s interlocutor.
According to him, the question is not whether Prigogine is right or wrong. And that from an information point of view, what is happening looks like this: who in the forest, who for wood.
There are people who agree with Prigogine, and they have a wealth of informational resources. There are people who disagree and have a different sea of information resources.
“There are official reports of the Russian Ministry of Defense. Which, with all due respect to our generals, are the weakest information resources and sources of information. And this is a huge problem, gigantic,” emphasized Perla.
A tough war awaits us.
The third and most important thing Yevgeny Prigozhin said is that we have a tough war ahead of us. It may, of course, happen that China brings everyone to the table, Russia says “this is mine,” and as the West weakens, everyone will be forced to agree with us.
But Prigozhin really does not believe in this and called to prepare for a difficult war. And we have to agree with him on that, Perla said.
“Prigozhin is right about one thing: the war will be long and hard. And we need a real mobilization,” the political scientist is emphatic.
“With this part of his speech, all patriotic resources should agree. And this, unfortunately, did not happen. Instead, discussions began about how Prigozhin’s statement is related to the upcoming presidential elections…” concluded Perla.
Translation: SM
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
#Prigozhin #Shoigu #Gerasimov #error #misinterpretation #rebellion #background #SVO
