/ world today news/ The intelligence quotient of the American administration currently seems lower than that of the Russian one.
There are no phillies or phobes here. We’re talking about IQ. And lower IQ threatens our existence. Russians can be anything – low-tech, energy-intensive, unsanitary, stupid, drunk, whatever… But Russians do not threaten our existence in any way. We don’t want Russian energy, they don’t give us Russian energy. It’s another thing if we want it, but they don’t give it to us. And what about the Americans: we want, they desperately want, but there is no way. This is the difference – with some we have the opportunity but no desire, with the others we have the desire but no opportunity. And they don’t have a chance.
This is in the sphere of Kobilkina – we can, but we don’t want, or we want, but we can’t.
The next lessons in political sexology… after the holidays.
Be patient with our participation in pornogerb film production.
#Lessons #political #sexology #View #Info
## Is America’s “Political IQ” Lagging Behind Russia’s? A Controversial Discussion
A recent commentary ignited a firestorm online, suggesting that the American administration’s intelligence quotient (IQ) is currently lower than that of it’s Russian counterpart. The author argues this discrepancy poses an existential threat, citing America’s desperation for resources Russia controls but refuses to provide. this provocative statement raises critical questions about geopolitics, power dynamics, and the nature of intelligence in international relations.
To unpack this controversial claim, World Today News has invited two leading experts: **Dr.Elizabeth Carter**, a political science professor at Columbia University specializing in international relations and diplomacy, and **Dr. Viktor Kozlov**, a senior researcher at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations in Moscow, focusing on Russian foreign policy.
### Defining “political IQ”
**World Today News:** Dr. Carter, the article uses the term “political IQ” in a rather unconventional way. Could you shed light on what that might mean in this context?
**Dr. Carter:** While IQ traditionally measures cognitive abilities, the author seems to be using “political IQ” to describe a nation’s ability to strategize effectively on the global stage, make sound decisions, and secure its interests.
**World Today News:** Dr. Kozlov, do you agree with this interpretation? Does Russia possess a distinct advantage in this regard?
**Dr. Kozlov:** It’s a complex issue. Russia certainly prioritizes its national interests and acts decisively, even if those actions are seen as aggressive by other nations. However, defining “success” in this context is subjective.
### Resource Control and Diplomatic Strategy
**World Today News:** The article highlights Russia’s control of resources America needs but cannot access. How important is this factor in geopolitical power dynamics?
**Dr. Carter:** Control over essential resources like energy is undeniably a key aspect of geopolitical power. Russia leverages its position strategically,especially when it comes to European energy security.
**world Today News:** Could this reliance on Russian resources be interpreted as a weakness for the West?
**Dr. Kozlov:** Not necessarily. Diversification of energy sources and the development of renewable alternatives are ongoing processes. The current situation may accelerate these trends, leading to a more multipolar energy landscape.
### The “Chance vs. Desire” Dilemma
**world Today News:** The article mentions a “Koblikina” principle, suggesting sometimes we have the opportunity but lack the desire, while other times we desire something unattainable. Could you elaborate on this concept in the context of international relations?
**Dr. Carter:** This principle highlights the complexities of decision-making in foreign policy. Ofen, national interests and political realities clash with ideal outcomes. Sometimes, the path of least resistance is chosen, even if it goes against long-term goals.
**World Today News:** Dr. Kozlov, how does this principle apply to Russia’s foreign policy?
**Dr. Kozlov:** Russia often calculates its moves carefully, weighing potential gains against risks and potential backlash. It prioritizes actions that align with its core national interests, even if they are unpopular with other nations.
### Looking Ahead: Risks and Opportunities
**World Today News:** Where do you see this “political IQ” debate leading? What are the potential risks and opportunities for both the US and russia?
**Dr. Carter:** Continued tense relations and a potential escalation of conflicts are serious risks. However, there’s also an opportunity for dialog and cooperation on shared challenges like climate change and global security.
**Dr. Kozlov:** Russia will continue to pursue its interests assertively. The West needs to find a way to engage with Russia constructively, recognizing its legitimate concerns while upholding its own values.
**Final Thoughts:**
The debate surrounding “political IQ” highlights the complexity of international relations and the importance of understanding diffrent perspectives. While the article’s provocative claims should be treated with caution, it raises significant questions about power dynamics, resource control, and the nature of strategic decision-making.
What are your thoughts on this controversial debate? Share your opinion in the comments below and explore more insightful articles on geopolitics and international relations on World Today News.
