The conversation between the parties has not stopped. Since 2 years, the people have been saying that they want a government. However, in my opinion, this conversation is not a government conversation. It is important exactly how many parties will be in the parliament and whether ITN will enter, because its entry will doom the possibility of “We continue the change” being the leaders in creating a government. This was stated by political scientist Tatiana Burudzhieva on bTV
“There are three winners and three losers – losers are PP-DB, winners are GERB-SDS. “Vazrazhdane” is with the winners, as well as ITN. I remain pessimistic about a regular government, it will be difficult to understand”, says Petar Cholakov.
Political scientist Associate Professor Stoicho Stoichev believes: “To a large extent, the delay is due to the large number of boxes in the protocols, not the counting. Let’s see how many voted by paper and how many by machine. The big problems come from the codification of the electoral process, which is meaningless.”
Political scientist Genoveva Petrova adds: “We have no reason to believe that the launched opportunity for voters to vote as they wish has led to high turnout. I would link it to trust in the parties. If there is a significant problem, it is that people are disappointed with the behavior of the parties.”
“People vote not because they get a walk every Sunday, but because they want this process to reproduce something,” believes Slavi Vasilev.
When asked if Hristo Ivanov is pushing for a dialogue with GERB, Cholakov thinks: “There are always those who can be tempted, but this is unlikely to happen. The horizon of this parliament is short, the fraud is not great. If it was for 4 years – yes, but now it is unlikely.”
