Home » News » Police Apologize for Outdated Notification of Nams Health Center Doctor – NRK Trøndelag News

Police Apologize for Outdated Notification of Nams Health Center Doctor – NRK Trøndelag News

Negligence in Nursing Home⁤ Medication Case Leads to Dismissal Amid Police‌ Inaction

In a shocking revelation, a case involving ​three‍ women with dementia at a ‍nursing home ⁢in Namsos, Norway, has been dismissed due to ‍police inaction. The women suffered severe side effects⁢ from anxiety-reducing medication, with two developing physical‍ deformities ‌within‍ months. The case, which highlights systemic failures in both healthcare and law enforcement, has sparked outrage among families and legal representatives.

The incident came⁢ to light when the three women’s spouses ⁤reported⁤ the former doctor at the nursing home to the ‍police in February last ‌year.‍ The ‌doctor, ⁤who was involved ⁤in⁤ all three ⁤cases, received a⁣ warning‌ from the state administrator after inspections⁣ revealed that the use of⁢ the medication ⁣was ⁢indefensible. It was established that the women were administered⁣ the tablets in 2021 and 2022.

Hege Skillingstad, the legal aid for the three‌ husbands, ⁣expressed her frustration: “I am very ⁢critical ‌of⁤ the fact that the case has been ‌left with the police, so⁤ that it has led to obsolescence.” ⁢ The case ⁢remained untouched for over seven months, leading to its eventual dismissal. Police attorney ⁢Christian Spets ‌from the Trøndelag ⁤police district admitted, ‍ “Regrettably, it was not caught‍ that there ⁤was a risk that the case‌ could become​ obsolete.”

The medication errors​ in this case are⁣ not isolated. Globally, medication errors ‍ are a leading cause of ⁣preventable harm in healthcare systems. The⁣ World Health Institution has emphasized the need for safer medication practices,notably in care homes,where‍ vulnerable populations are at higher‌ risk.

Key Points of the⁣ Case

| Aspect ‌ ⁣ ‍ ⁣ | Details ⁢ ‍ ⁢ ‌ ⁤ ⁤ ⁣ ‌⁣ ‍ ⁣ ‌ |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Incident ​ |⁤ Three women with dementia suffered ‌severe side effects from anxiety medication. |
| Outcome |​ Two women ⁣developed ⁣physical deformities ​within months. ⁣ ‌ |
|⁣ Legal⁤ Action ‍ ‍ ⁢ ‍ | Case ⁢dismissed due‍ to ⁣police inaction ‌over ​seven months. ⁤ ‌ ‍ ⁣ |
| Violation ⁣ ⁢ | ​Breach⁣ of health personnel law by‍ the former doctor. ‍ ‍ ⁣ ‍ ‍ |
| Response ⁤‍ ‌ ⁤ | Doctor ‍received a warning from the state administrator. ⁣ ⁤‍ ‍ ⁣ |

The dismissal ⁢of the case has ‍left the ​families of the victims without justice. It also raises⁢ questions about the accountability of healthcare providers and the⁢ efficiency of​ legal systems⁢ in addressing such ‌critical issues.‌

This case⁢ underscores the urgent need for systemic reforms to prevent medication errors ⁣ and ensure timely investigations ​into healthcare-related⁤ complaints. As the ​families ⁣seek closure,‌ the broader ⁢conversation about patient safety and ‍legal accountability continues.

What steps can be ‍taken to prevent such​ incidents⁢ in the future? share your ⁤thoughts and join the discussion on improving​ healthcare accountability.

Permanently Crooked: ​A Nursing ⁣Home Tragedy ⁣Sparks⁤ Legal and ⁤Ethical Debates

In a heart-wrenching case that has​ raised ⁢serious questions ‍about medical oversight ‍and ⁢accountability, a woman ‍in ‍a Norwegian ⁣nursing home was left permanently disabled after being prescribed the antipsychotic drug Risperdal for ⁤six months.The incident has led to a formal complaint against‌ the police investigation,with the‌ public⁢ prosecutor in Trøndelag concluding ⁤that⁣ any potential criminal liability is now obsolete due to the ‌passage of ⁤time.

The woman, whose identity‌ remains ⁣confidential, became “more and more crooked” during her treatment, as described by her next of ⁤kin. The family has been vocal about their‍ dissatisfaction with the​ handling ‍of the‌ case,particularly the police’s decision to close the ⁢investigation without further action.

A Controversial Closure

The‍ complaint was filed by the woman’s legal⁢ counsel, who argued that the police failed to adequately investigate potential breaches of the Health Personnel Act. state attorney Jarle Wikdahl, who ‍reviewed the case, stated ‌in a letter to the⁣ family’s lawyer:‌ “any⁢ criminal liability for breaches of the Health Personnel Act⁢ is‌ obsolete.”⁤

This decision has sparked outrage among advocates for patient rights, who argue that ⁢the​ case highlights systemic issues in ⁢the oversight of medical‍ treatments in nursing ⁣homes. The family’s legal team has‍ not yet indicated weather they will pursue further legal⁣ action,​ but the case has already ignited a broader conversation about the ethical responsibilities of healthcare providers. ⁢

The Role ‍of Risperdal⁢ ⁤

Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication frequently enough prescribed for conditions like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, ‍has been at the center of numerous controversies due to its potential side effects. ‌In this case, the ‍prolonged use ⁢of the drug appears to have caused irreversible physical harm‍ to the patient.

The‍ woman’s⁢ condition deteriorated ⁣considerably over the six-month period,leaving her permanently disabled. Her family has expressed deep frustration with the lack of accountability,stating that the‍ nursing home‌ and prescribing⁣ physicians failed to monitor her condition adequately. ⁤

Key Points at ⁤a Glance

| Aspect ⁤ | Details ‌ ‌ ⁢ ​ ⁣ ‌ ⁣ ⁤ ‌ ⁣ ⁢ ⁣ |
|————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Medication ‌ ⁢ | Risperdal prescribed for six⁤ months⁤ ⁣ ⁤ ⁢ ⁤ ⁣ ‌ |
| Outcome ‌ ⁣ | Patient became permanently disabled ​ ‍ ‌ ⁣ ‌ ⁣ ​ ‍ ⁤ ⁣ ⁣‍ |
| ⁤ Legal Action ​ ⁢‌ | Complaint filed against police investigation ‍ ‌ ‍ ‍ ​ ‌ ⁢ ‍ |
|⁢ Prosecutor’s Decision| Criminal liability deemed obsolete due to time⁢ lapse ‌ |
| Ethical Concerns ​ | Questions raised about medical oversight in ‌nursing homes ‍‍ ⁢ ⁢ |

A Call for Accountability ⁢

The ​case has underscored the ‌need for stricter regulations and better monitoring of medication ‍use in nursing ⁢homes. advocates are calling for reforms⁢ to ensure that ⁤such tragedies do not occur in the​ future.

as the family continues to seek justice,their story ⁤serves as a stark reminder of ‌the‍ potential consequences of medical ⁢negligence. For now, the legal‌ battle‌ may be over, but the ethical and systemic questions it raises are far from resolved.

What⁤ do you think about this case? Should‌ there be⁣ stricter oversight of ​medication use in nursing homes? Share your thoughts in the comments ‌below.

Photo: Eivind​ Aabakken

Proven Offenses After ‍Supervision: A Deep‌ Dive ⁣into Namso Health Centre’s‌ legal Breaches

Recent ​inspections by the State Administrator have revealed alarming legal violations at Namso’s health centre,where three⁣ women were subjected to prolonged and unjustified treatment with antipsychotic drugs. The findings highlight systemic failures in both medical and administrative ‌practices, raising ​serious concerns about patient ​rights and​ ethical healthcare standards.

The Core Issues​

The investigations⁤ uncovered‌ multiple⁢ breaches ‌of the Health Personnel ⁢Act, particularly ‌in the management of ⁢ Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication. ‍According to the state⁤ Administrator, the treatment lacked ‍proper ​justification, violating ⁣the propriety requirement outlined in Section 4 of ‌the Health Personnel Act.

Additionally, the rights ‌of the patients’ relatives were disregarded. ⁢They were not adequately informed ⁢about the⁢ treatment plans, a ‍clear violation of their legal entitlement ​to information. ​

Key Findings:

  • Unjustified Use of Risperdal: The ‍prolonged administration of antipsychotics without proper medical justification.
  • Failure‌ to Inform Relatives:​ relatives were ⁣denied their right to be informed about⁣ the treatment, a breach of ethical and legal standards.

A ​Systemic Failure ​

The offenses were not isolated incidents but rather indicative of broader systemic issues. Both ‌the municipality and several‍ doctors⁢ were implicated in ⁤the violations.This raises questions about oversight and accountability within the healthcare system.State prosecutor Jarle Wikdahl, ‍who handled the complaint⁣ from the relatives, expressed confusion over ‍the police’s handling of the ‍case. He stated, “I am⁤ not⁤ familiar with the reason why the case was apparently kept quiet ⁣by the police from April to November.” This delay in addressing ‌the complaints further underscores the need for clarity and ⁢timely action in such cases.

A Call for Accountability ⁢

The revelations from Namso’s health centre serve as a stark reminder of the‍ importance of adhering to‌ legal‌ and ethical standards in healthcare. Patients and their families must be treated with respect ​and transparency, and any deviation from these principles ​must‌ be met with​ swift⁣ and decisive action.‌

Summary Table:⁤ Key Violations at Namso Health Centre

|⁤ Violation ⁢ ⁢ ⁢ ⁢ | Details ⁢ ‌ ⁣ ‍ ‍ ‌ ​ ⁤ ⁤ ⁢ ⁢ ⁣ ⁤ |
|———————————–|—————————————————————————–|
| Unjustified⁤ Use ⁤of Risperdal | Prolonged antipsychotic treatment without proper medical justification. ⁢ |
|⁤ Failure to Inform Relatives ‌ ⁢| Relatives ‍were not provided with ⁣necessary information ‌about the treatment. | ​
| Breach of Health Personnel Act ‍ ‌ | Violation of Section​ 4, which mandates propriety in healthcare practices. ‌ |‌

Moving Forward

The case at Namso’s ‍health centre highlights the urgent need for​ stricter ​oversight and⁢ accountability in healthcare institutions. It also underscores the importance of⁤ empowering ‍patients and their families with the right to information and ‌participation in treatment decisions.for ⁣more information‍ on patient rights and healthcare standards, visit the Norwegian Health Personnel Act.

This case serves as ⁢a critical ‌reminder that healthcare must always prioritize the well-being and rights of patients.Let’s hope it sparks meaningful change in the ‌system.


What are your thoughts on ⁤this case? Share your opinions in⁢ the ‌comments below ⁤or explore more about ⁢ patient‍ rights in healthcare.

Relatives Exhausted After Fighting ‌for Dignity in Healthcare at Namsos Health Center

Relatives of patients at⁤ Namsos⁣ Health Center ⁣in Trøndelag, Norway, are ⁢expressing frustration and exhaustion​ after years of battling what​ they describe as harmful healthcare practices.According⁤ to‍ a recent report, the State Administrator in Trøndelag has identified ⁢breaches of the ‍ Health Personnel Act and the⁢ Patient ‌and User Rights Act, including failures to obtain consent from next of kin when providing care to‍ patients unable to consent themselves.

Welfare lawyer Heidi Skillingstad, who ‍represents the affected families, has been vocal about ⁣the systemic issues. “Only then do they receive harmful healthcare. The next of​ kin have ‍to​ put a ‌stop to it when they⁢ see that the spouses are getting so much⁢ worse,” she said. Skillingstad also criticized the‍ police ⁣for allegedly allowing cases to lapse due⁢ to the statute of limitations, leaving families without⁢ recourse.

The municipality‌ and doctors involved have ⁢as stated that routines have been ‍updated to‍ address ⁢these concerns. However,the emotional toll ⁢on families remains significant.

Key Issues Identified

The State Administrator’s report highlighted several critical⁢ failures:

  • Breach of the Health Personnel Act Section 10: This section mandates ​that healthcare providers must ensure patient safety and dignity.
  • Breach of‍ the ⁣Patient and User Rights⁤ Act: Specifically, the failure to consult next ⁣of kin when patients cannot provide consent. ⁣

A Husband’s Fight⁤ for Justice ⁤

One‌ poignant case involves the husband of a ⁤woman treated at Namsos Health Center,who filed ‍a police report ‌against a doctor for alleged serious medication errors. Despite his‍ efforts, the case was reportedly shelved ⁢due ⁤to⁤ the statute of limitations.

| Key Points | Details | ⁢
|—————-|————-|
|‌ Breaches Identified | Health Personnel Act, Patient ⁣and User Rights Act |⁤
| Main Issue ⁢| Failure to‌ consult next of kin⁢ for consent‍ |⁤ ⁢
| Current Status | Routines updated, but‌ families remain dissatisfied |

Moving Forward ‍

While the municipality has implemented changes,⁢ the emotional and psychological ‌impact on‍ families lingers. Skillingstad⁣ emphasized the need for systemic reform to prevent similar issues in the future. ⁢“The police then simply let the case lie⁢ until the statute of ‍limitations ​expires. It has therefore just been put in the drawer,” she said. ​

For more‍ information on⁢ patient rights in Norway,visit⁢ the Norwegian Directorate‍ of Health. ⁤

This case underscores⁣ the ‍importance of ‌ patient advocacy and the need for⁣ healthcare systems⁢ to prioritize transparency and accountability.‌ Families affected by these issues⁢ continue to⁣ seek justice and systemic change to ensure ‌dignity and safety for their ‍loved ones.

Photo: Eivind⁢ Aabakken / NRK=””>The husband‍ turned up ⁢at the police and reported the doctor for serious incorrect‌ medication at Namso’s health centre.

Photo: Eivind Aabakken / NRK

Relatives⁢ experience this as a betrayal, ⁤says Skillingstad.

They experience the layoff as another slap in the face,and they experience that people with dementia have no ‌legal protection,she says.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.