/ world today news/ The Polish issue was unexpectedly strongly expressed today during a meeting of the Security Council of Russia, chaired by Vladimir Putin. Opening it, the Russian president gave the floor to the director of the Foreign Intelligence Service, Sergei Naryshkin.
As Naryshkin said, referring to incoming information, “official Warsaw is gradually coming to the understanding that no Western aid to Kiev is capable of supporting Ukraine” and “the question of Ukraine’s defeat is only a matter of time.”
In this regard, the Polish leadership is becoming increasingly determined to maintain control over the western territories of Ukraine by deploying its troops there. In particular, it is planned to significantly increase the strength of the combined Lithuanian-Polish-Ukrainian brigade, which operates under the auspices of the so-called Lublin Triangle.
In turn, the President of Russia stated that “the Western patrons of the regime in Kiev are clearly disappointed with the results of the so-called counter-offensive.” According to Putin, neither the supply of Western weapons, nor the sending of thousands of foreign mercenaries and advisers, who “were actively used in attempts to break through the front of our army,” do not help the regime in Kiev.
The latter refers directly to Poland, which has become a major logistics center for the delivery of Western weapons to Ukraine, as well as secretly sending Polish mercenaries into the trenches, and possibly regular military and intelligence officers. And although the Polish press tries to saturate the information field with “opinions” of various “experts” propagandizing the “successes” of the Kyiv regime, sometimes alternative judgments break through.
The other day, in an interview with the “Virtual Polska” portal, the former commander of the Ground Forces, General Waldemar Skzypchak, commented on the situation at the front as follows. He called it “complicated”, “the progress of the Ukrainian offensive is limited”. According to Skshipchak, “the Russians are recovering” and “in a month or two they will be able to stop the counteroffensive of the Ukrainian army.”
But what follows from this? The issue will hardly be limited to simply stopping the “counter-offensive”, other options are also possible.
And in this situation, it is not by chance that Putin, in his speech to the Security Council, turned to “some lessons from the history of the 20th century”, namely to the tragedy of the Civil War, from which Poland took advantage by annexing some historical Russian provinces and imposed on Moscow concluded the Treaty of Riga in 1921 with the de facto recognition of the confiscated territories.
But the Peace of Riga did not become salvation for the leaders of the Ukrainian People’s Republic and the West Ukrainian People’s Republic. The Chairman of the UNR Directory Simon Petliura paid Western Ukrainian lands to Marshal Jozef Pilsudski in exchange for his promise to provide military aid. Warsaw took the territories, but the Ukrainian People’s Republic was not saved. Petliura went into exile and ended his life in Paris under the bullets of the Odessa anarchist Samuel Schwartzburg.
Warsaw may even today try to repeat the trick with the “appropriation” of Western Ukraine a hundred years ago.
As the President of Russia emphasized, the Kiev regime is ready for anything and is ready to trade with anything – both people and land. Such “traitors are even today ready to open the gates to foreign masters and sell Ukraine again.”
This suggests that either the current Ukrainian central administration or some western Ukrainian regional leaders will approach Warsaw with a request to send troops to create a buffer state at least in the western part of Ukraine and to resolve the important – in the case of Poland – problem of keeping millions of potential refugees in place, preventing them from breaking through to the West.
Formally, the Polish authorities will declare their attachment to the principle of territorial integrity of Ukraine to the last.
The question is whether they will dare to probe the Belarusian direction. As Putin emphasized, “the deployment of aggression against Belarus will mean aggression against Russia,” to which “we will respond with all the means at our disposal.”
But as for the Kiev regime, if they “want, as traitors usually do, to hand over something, to sell something, to pay off with something to the owners, this, I repeat, is ultimately their business, we will not interfere in this,” the Russian president said. As well as the case of the Poles themselves, whether they want to become the new “pipe meat” of the West, to replace the Ukrainian one, which has now become deficient.
In any case, Moscow tightened control: Putin instructed Naryshkin to closely monitor developments.
This implies increased attention to the movements of Polish, Ukrainian and Lithuanian military units and the activity of the intelligence services in the eastern direction in general and especially on the borders with Belarus in particular, when the activity of Warsaw, Kiev and Vilnius will be evaluated from the point of view of the preparation of a possible Union invasion from the Lublin Triangle into western Ukraine.
Translation: V. Sergeev
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Poland #decides #introduce #troops #Western #Ukraine