Thai Post 0 “Piyabutr” breaks with “Pitha” for dragging his feet on the party’s plan to move forward in 2024 without amending Section 112, which is considered a mistake. It’s like sending a “crouch” signal before the ruling in the Section 112 case on the 31st, to the opposing side that he is waiting to take revenge on. Further advice, reply to Dom Som, saying that it is not possible to amend Section 112 because the Constitutional Court has forbidden it. Please don’t go on tour. While Page moves forward to thwart the Constitutional Court Releasing an edited clip is not the same as subverting it.
On January 27, 2024, there was a broad reaction when Mr. Pitha Limjaroenrat Party-list MPs from the Move Forward Party return to the House of Representatives again. After the Constitutional Court ruled on the ITV shareholding case and announced the party’s plans for moving forward in 2024, especially the issue of amending Section 112.
By Mr. Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, secretary-general of the Progress Party, posted on Facebook about moving forward with the amendment to 112, stating that I had been involved in setting up the Future Forward Party. Through political experience, he confirms that politics must combine our ideals with political reality. There are advances and retreats according to the assessment of the situation.
I myself have retreated many times for the organization’s sake in order to move forward according to the situation. This matter is evaluation. Nothing was strung together. There’s nothing wrong.
Therefore, criticizing the pace of political parties Therefore, there may be people who agree. There are people who have different opinions. Party workers may not agree with the criticism. This is normal.
I do not agree with the statement of the party’s plan for moving forward in 2024. I understand that The party staff wanted to make this statement. To welcome the return of Pitha But when I saw all the contents, I saw that… mistakes, especially the plan to propose 47 draft bills without draft 112 amendments.
The Party may not have thought it necessary to talk about this matter. But the media thinks And the media asked Jie to expand on the results, saying that in summary, 47 issues in 2024, there were no amendments to 112, right? What are the effects of this case?
1. Reiterate the idea that We must accept the power of the Constitutional Court to rise above the legislative branch. Proposing a law Do you have to listen to what the Constitutional Court has to say?
2. Not offering and saying no. Because waiting for the Constitutional Court It’s like sending a “crouch” signal before the decision on the 31st.
3. If the party moves forward and thinks in a clever and cunning way, there is no need to make a statement today. Please be patient and wait for the Constitutional Court to decide on January 31 first, in case the Constitutional Court finds a “way down” for the party to move forward. By setting the framework for solving 112
Next, the Kaew Klai Party can answer to the voters that they cannot amend Section 112 because of what the Constitutional Court’s ruling says. I’m not so naive that to solve 112, I have to do this alone. without having to do anything else
I am well aware of the attack/wait/retreat process, but I see that the movements throughout this week until January 31, when the court will decide, were done without thinking about evaluating the advance, retreat, and managing the expectations of the selectors. But it’s more focused in the “crouch” direction, thinking that it will help preserve the party. And when it’s like this It’s towards the opposing side that he is waiting for “revenge” for being accused of being dishonest. I have already predicted what decision the Constitutional Court will make.
I can only hope All progressive party leaders Will evaluate all matters thoroughly. without aiming to preserve the party and party executive committee To the point of having to exchange everything.
I expect that if the Constitutional Court decides You will hear some criticism from the Progressive Party. If the progressive party does not criticize the Constitutional Court at all I will definitely be the first to come out and criticize the Kao Klai Party and I will criticize the decision of the Constitutional Court. According to the normal course of the academic process as I practiced.
P.S.: Block out the supporters of the Kaew Klai Party for now. to scold Why didn’t I go and tell them first? We didn’t talk internally. I don’t know what they were doing. I’m an outsider. I only knew from reading the news, along with the general public who watched the media.
Meanwhile, the Progressive Party released a video clip reiterating its position saying that amending is not equal to overthrowing through Facebook with the message that reform must not be equal to overthrowing. Amendment 112 is not equal to overthrowing institutions. But it is the duty of a parliamentary democracy.
The Progressive Party would like to confirm that The amendment to Section 112 of the Criminal Code is in order to maintain the monarchy in a democratic society. By creating a balance between protecting the head of state and protecting people’s freedom of expression
Because of placing the monarchy in a high place Do not use harsh laws and high penalties. But it is about maintaining the status of the monarch on the basis of reason, wisdom, and the consent of the people.
Mr. Wirot Lakkhanaadisorn, list MP for the Progressive Party, posted a message giving his legal perspective. After the result of a petition filed by the Kao Klai Party in the campaign to amend Section 112, regarding the dissolution of the party I’ve never been worried. You could even say that you shrugged your shoulders with both hands. Because in my heart, the word ‘party’ has become an ideology. It cannot collapse, but it will continue.”
Mr. Thanakorn Wangboonkhongchana, member of the House of Representatives on a party list basis and Deputy Leader of the Ruam Thai Sang Chart Party (RTC) mentioned the case of Mr. Pitha Limcharoenrat List of MPs and the chairman of the Forward Party which states that those who commit crimes under Section 112 of the Criminal Code, most of whom are youths It is considered a political movement. Therefore, this case will be included in Kaoklawa’s draft political amnesty bill. After listening to Mr. Pitha giving an interview to the media on this matter Therefore it is not surprising that MP of the Progressive Party Same as Mr. Pitha which he did not agree with and would like to object because the case of defamation and violation of the monarchy is a criminal case. It’s not political.
“I emphasize that the institution is not involved in politics. Therefore, I would like to request Mr. Pitha Who recently returned to serve as an MP in the House of Representatives to reconsider this matter. Whether there is any misunderstanding or not, because Section 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code is intended to protect the King. who is the head of state and the institution is national security No one can transgress. The way Mr. Pitha thinks and views like this It is considered very dangerous for the country,” Mr. Thanakorn said.
2024-01-27 17:01:59
#Piyabutyam #Pitha #Kho #M.112
