Gustavo Petro is facing one of the most chaotic moments in his two years of government. There is the request for protocol resignations to several officials after the Council of Ministers, which generated a deep crisis and fueled the case of the Criminal Empire of “Dad pitufo,” who allegedly financed the presidential campaign of the president. Additionally, the rise of Armando Benedetti as head of the dispatch has caused discomfort among other ministers due to his various corruption scandals.

Criticisms of Petro have intensified as he participates in the World Government Summit 2025 in the United Arab Emirates.This global forum brings together heads of state, international leaders, and experts to discuss the main challenges of the future. The discord arises as the president left the country in the middle of the ministerial crisis and with violence in the Catatumbo, northern Santander.

In a speech held on Tuesday, Petro said he left the country to discuss artificial intelligence and the power it has acquired over time. He stated, “Artificial intelligence in a few years will handle the world economy, the machines, probably these devices sadly skinny, the cameras, everything … taking millions and millions of workers from the jobs around the world, hundreds of millions, and increasing the productivity and gain of those who own artificial intelligence.”

He also talked about capitalism and its implications in developed countries: “knowing what capitalism is very captivating in the nineteenth century, but we have forgotten it in the 21st century and I think we must remember it: capitalism is not more or less than a way to produce, that he was born, that develops and that can die like everything fluid in human life … and his great engine is nothing more than win.”

As he usually does in his speeches, the head of state mentioned fascism and democratic paths in relation to artificial intelligence: “With almost slave and unworthy treatments to emigrants, who have to do with a return to fascism.And I believe that there is a democratic path, but that it jumps towards humanity can be found to regulate publicly, not privately.”

Capitalism’s Evolution and Democratic Paths in the 21st Century

In recent addresses, the head of state has delved into the nuances of capitalism and its implications in developed countries. He emphasized the need to remember capitalism as more than just an economic system, but a dynamic process that can evolve and perhaps decline. Additionally, he touched on the importance of democratic regulation in the face of contemporary challenges like migrant treatment and artificial intelligence.

Understanding Capitalism in the 21st Century

Senior Editor: Can you explain what you understand by the statement that “capitalism is a way to produce, that was born, that develops and that can die like everything fluid in human life”?

Dr. Maria Rodriguez: Certainly. Capitalism, in its essence, is a system of production and exchange driven by profit. Though, it’s crucial to view it as a dynamic process rather than a static entity. Just as societies and technologies evolve, capitalism to undergoes changes. its birth, advancement, and potential decline are all part of its fluid nature. This perspective highlights the need for continuous adaptation and regulation to ensure its sustainability and fairness.

The Great Engine of Capitalism

senior Editor: You mentioned that the “great engine” of capitalism is to “win.” How does this impact the way we perceive and practice capitalism today?

Dr. Maria Rodriguez: The focus on winning can lead to intense competition and innovation, which are positive aspects of capitalism. However, it can also result in exploitation and inequality if not properly regulated. The emphasis on profit can sometimes overshadow ethical considerations and social responsibilities.Balancing the drive to win with ethical practices is essential for sustainable capitalism.

Fascism and Democratic Paths

Senior Editor: The head of state also touched on fascism and democratic paths in relation to contemporary issues. How do you interpret these remarks?

Dr. Maria Rodriguez: The reference to fascism underscores the dangers of unchecked power and exploitation.Democratic paths offer a counterbalance by promoting public regulation and social welfare. The democratic approach aims to create a more equitable society where the interests of the many are protected, rather than just the few. public regulation ensures that capitalism serves the broader societal good.

Artificial Intelligence and Democratic Regulation

Senior Editor: How do you think democratic regulation can be applied to artificial intelligence?

Dr. Maria Rodriguez: Democratic regulation of AI involves creating frameworks that ensure clarity, accountability, and fairness. This includes public oversight to prevent misuse and ensure that AI technologies benefit society as a whole. By regulating AI publicly, we can mitigate risks and harness its potential for positive social impact.

Conclusion

Senior Editor: What are the main takeaways from our discussion?

dr. Maria Rodriguez: The main takeaways are the importance of viewing capitalism as a dynamic process, the need to balance competition with ethical practices, and the critical role of democratic regulation in addressing contemporary challenges like AI and migrant treatment. By embracing these principles, we can strive for a more equitable and sustainable future.