Two New Suspects Named in Pertamina Corruption Case: AGO Inquiry Deepens
Table of Contents
Jakarta – The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has expanded its investigation into alleged corruption within PT Pertamina (Persero), identifying two new suspects in a case concerning crude oil governance and refinery products. Maya Kusmaya, Director of Marketing at Pertamina Commerce Patra Niaga, and Edward Corne, VP Trading operation at pertamina Patra Niaga, were named as suspects on Wednesday, febuary 26th, in Jakarta.The AGO’s investigation is focused on alleged state losses totaling Rp193.7 trillion.
This declaration marks a significant development in the ongoing probe, which has already implicated several individuals from both Pertamina and private entities. Abdul Qohar, Dirdik Jampidsus at the AGO, addressed the press, stating that investigators had uncovered sufficient evidence to implicate Maya Kusmaya and Edward Corne.
Arrest and Detention
Following their questioning as witnesses, investigators promptly arrested both Maya Kusmaya and Edward Corne. They are currently being held at the Salemba Detention Center within the Attorney General’s Office complex. Abdul Qohar confirmed the detention, stating, “moreover, the investigation team held a detention for the next 20 days.” This detention period allows investigators to further examine the evidence and build their case against the suspects.
Existing Suspects and allegations
Prior to the naming of Maya Kusmaya and Edward Corne, the AGO had already identified seven suspects in connection with the alleged corruption. These individuals include:
- Riva Siahaan, President Director of PT pertamina Patra Niaga
- SDS, director of Feed Stock and Product Optimization of PT Kilang Pertamina Internasional
- YF, President Director of PT Pertamina International Shipping
- AP, VP Feed Stock management of PT Kilang Pertamina International
- DW, Beneficial Owner of PT Navigator Khatulistiwa and Commissioner of PT Jenggala Maritime
- YRJ, Commissioner of PT Jenggala maritime and managing Director of PT Orbit Terminal mera
The allegations against these individuals involve a complex web of transactions and management decisions related to crude oil exports, imports, and fuel subsidies. The AGO’s investigation aims to uncover the full extent of the alleged corruption and hold those responsible accountable.
Financial Losses Detailed
The AGO has outlined the specific financial losses that form the basis of the corruption case. These losses, totaling Rp193.7 trillion, are broken down as follows:
- Losses from domestic crude oil exports: approximately Rp35 trillion
- Losses from crude oil imports thru DMUT/broker: Approximately Rp2.7 trillion
- Losses from fuel imports thru DMUT/broker: Approximately Rp9 trillion
- Losses from compensation (2023): Approximately Rp126 trillion
- Losses from subsidies (2023): approximately Rp21 trillion
These figures highlight the significant financial impact of the alleged corruption on the Indonesian economy. The investigation is expected to continue to uncover further details about the specific mechanisms and individuals involved in these alleged illicit activities.
AGO’s Commitment to Clarity
The Attorney General’s Office has emphasized its commitment to conducting a thorough and obvious investigation into the Pertamina corruption case. The naming of Maya Kusmaya and Edward Corne as suspects demonstrates the AGO’s determination to pursue all leads and hold accountable those who are found to have engaged in corrupt practices. The investigation remains ongoing, and further developments are expected as the AGO continues its work.
“Investigators have found sufficient evidence that the two suspects are suspected of committing a criminal offense with seven suspects that we have conveyed.”
Dirdik Jampidsus AGO Abdul Qohar, at a press conference in Jakarta, Wednesday (26/2) night.
The AGO’s actions underscore the importance of accountability and clarity in the management of state-owned enterprises and the utilization of public funds. The outcome of this investigation will likely have significant implications for the future governance and oversight of Pertamina and other similar entities.
Pertamina Corruption Scandal: Unraveling Indonesia’s Multi-Trillion Rupiah Allegations
Did you know that alleged corruption within Indonesia’s state-owned energy giant, Pertamina, could amount to losses exceeding Rp193.7 trillion? This staggering figure points to a systemic issue that demands a thorough investigation and comprehensive reforms. Let’s delve deeper into this complex case with dr. Anya Sharma, a leading expert in Southeast Asian economics and corporate governance.
World-Today-News.com Senior Editor (W): Dr. Sharma, thank you for joining us. Teh recent arrests of Pertamina executives and the revelation of such massive alleged losses have sent shockwaves through Indonesia. Can you provide some context to the scale of this alleged financial mismanagement?
dr. Anya Sharma (AS): Certainly. The alleged losses in the Pertamina case, totaling over Rp193.7 trillion,represent a meaningful blow to Indonesia’s economy. This amount is not just a large number; it represents lost opportunities for education, infrastructure growth, and vital social programs. Understanding the scale involves recognizing the various components of the alleged corruption, including losses claimed to stem from the export and import of crude oil, and compensation and subsidy schemes. This complexity makes comprehensive investigation crucial. Breaking down the losses, as outlined in the article, demonstrates the systemic nature of the issues we face.
W: The Attorney General’s Office (AGO) has named several suspects, including executives from Pertamina and private entities. What are the typical red flags associated with state-owned enterprise (SOE) corruption, and how do they seem to manifest in this case?
AS: Corruption in SOEs is, regrettably, a global problem. Red flags frequently enough include opaque transactions, conflicts of interest, lack of clarity in procurement processes, and a general culture of impunity. In this case,the alleged losses related to crude oil exports,imports facilitated by brokers (DMUT),and the significant sums tied to compensation and fuel subsidies point towards possible violations of fiduciary duty and breach of contract. The involvement of both Pertamina executives and private entities suggests a potential web of collusive relationships aimed at personal enrichment at the expense of the state. The investigation into these alleged transactions will likely center around scrutinizing contracts, documenting flows of funds, and considering the role of internal controls.
W: The AGO’s investigation cites losses from crude oil exports,imports,fuel subsidies,and compensation payments. Can you elaborate on the inherent risks associated with each of these areas and why they might be vulnerable to corruption?
AS: You’ve highlighted key areas of vulnerability. Crude oil exports and imports carry inherent risk due to price volatility and the potential for manipulation.Transparency and fair pricing mechanisms are crucial to prevent illicit enrichment. In this case, the involvement of brokers raises concerns about potential kickbacks or conflicts of interest.The fuel subsidies program, as demonstrated, could be a prime area for fraud, especially if ther is a lack of robust monitoring and auditing procedures. Similarly, any compensation scheme demands rigorous oversight to guard against misappropriation. Each of these components needs a detailed,autonomous audit trail to confirm appropriate procedures and legal compliance while ensuring the public remains informed through maximum transparency.
W: What measures can Indonesia implement to prevent similar instances of alleged corruption within Pertamina and othre SOEs in the future?
AS: Indonesia needs a far-reaching multi-pronged strategy. First and foremost, robust and independent oversight mechanisms are crucial. This includes strengthened internal audit systems, more independent external audits, and increased transparency in all financial transactions. Enhanced legal frameworks addressing corporate governance and penalties for financial malfeasance are necessary. Secondly, developing a culture of accountability that goes beyond the arrest of few key individuals is crucial. This calls for improving corporate ethics training for Pertamina employees and enforcing whistleblower protections. stronger public participation and increased media scrutiny are necessary.
W: What are the broader implications of this alleged corruption scandal for Indonesia’s economy and its international reputation?
AS: This scandal damages Indonesia’s international reputation and weakens investor confidence. The size of the alleged losses demonstrates a significant blow to the nation’s financial standing. It also prompts questions about governance practices in Indonesian state-owned enterprises and requires reforms. The perception of corruption can severely affect foreign direct investment, making long term economic sustainability more challenging. Addressing the root causes, not just the symptoms identified here, is essential to regaining investor trust and pursuing economic growth.
W: Thank you, Dr. Sharma,for your insightful commentary. This alleged corruption within Pertamina serves as a crucial reminder of the need for greater transparency, stronger accountability, and robust governance within SOEs globally.
In closing, the alleged Pertamina corruption underscores the critical need for comprehensive reforms in corporate governance and stricter financial oversight in Indonesia and beyond.What are your thoughts? Share your perspectives in the comments below!